Expected better than this from the Barbie team…
What we got is Grok built slop that never touches the facts
@SteveBakerUSA actually put on the table. Shoe size. Gait. Body. Eyesight. None of it is in there.
The one point they land is “legal.” They never say whether it’s right. They never say whether it’s moral.
Run every one of those talking points backward and they fit every J6 case. The government imprisoned us for four years on what was “legal.” Was it moral? They never had to answer that either.
Talking points went out. Both sides pushed. Two camps on the right, neither one in the mood to give an inch.
I’ll sit with the autistic black kid before I sit with these people. Fuck these ho’s.
Oh and fuck Bongino too.
The Cole story everyone is selling is the wrong story.
Brian Cole Jr. is charged. The public case is purchases, location data, a plate reader hit, YouTube, Reddit, Discord with unnamed friends, and an allegation of 943 factory resets.
That is the case. What got built around it is a media campaign.
Three lawyers, not one. John Ross Glover, J. Alexander Little, and Zachary Lawson were reported on Cole’s defense by 29 December 2025. On 15 June 2026 the civil docket shows admission applications for those same three, naming Steve Baker, Joseph Hanneman, and Veritas Regnat. Prosecutors flagged the conflict.
Defaults went in against the reporters and the company on 21 May, then a motion to set them aside. Default is not a judgment. Overlap is not proof anybody crossed a line. It is the part the thread accounts skip.
30 September is the date to remember.
The government’s status report says Cole’s defense was given Kerkhoff’s interview transcripts, cellphone extraction, location analysis, surveillance, polygraph results, and grand jury material already under a protective order. The lawyers for the accused now hold the file on the woman suing their other clients. Possession is not misuse. It is the question that has not been answered.
Two fundraisers. Not one pile of money. Hanneman’s GiveSendGo, “Help Censored Journalists Expose Jan 6 Corruption,” lists Veritas Regnat as the recipient. The 8 April announcement said it would launch their reporting operation, including the pipe bombs. Delicia Cole’s defense fund is separate. $30,150 toward $50,000. Donors unknown.
Kerkhoff’s amended complaint alleges the reporters raised over $33,000 on the accusation and later pitched the lawsuit as a reason to give. That is her pleading, not a finding.
StopHate scored it before it was checked. David Sumrall published the former-officer theory on 17 November and treated Baker as vindication of the films.
On 24 November Tamara Leigh wrote that naming Kerkhoff “served to put points on the board for patriots,” while admitting the identity might have been premature. Same piece logs the shift from insurrection to fedsurrection as the campaign win. They cite him. He gets scored. The score gets cited back.
The gait claim is still not checkable. In the 23 May interview Baker would not release the report, citing source protection. He would not say whether the operator is a credentialed forensic gait expert until the analyst names himself. No error rate. A similarity score is not a probability she planted the devices. Ask what 94 means with no base rate.
Blaze pulled the piece when Cole was arrested. Baker and Hanneman kept going. Ed Martin rejected the rumor on 7 November, before she was named on 8 November. Her lawyer, Steve Bunnell, says phone video put her at home, metadata and forensics backed the alibi, and investigators cleared her. The FBI declined comment.
Shared counsel is a motive that does not need a foreign author. Reputation, the lawsuit, the company fund, and an alternative suspect for Cole all point the same direction.
Documented contact is not command. The open item is whether those three clients were kept separate, and whether any of that 30 September material moved from the criminal file into the civil defense or the copy.