I'm sorry to you and to everyone. I get why it feels condescending. I am challenging the map you are using, and that is uncomfortable. The flat map trains people to see politics as a line. Democrat here. Republican there. One side closer to fascism. One side farther away. That feels obvious because the system repeats it everywhere: schools, media, elections, pundits, platforms, party language. But the line is the prison. The missing piece is the vertical axis: where power sits. Above people as authority, or with people as agency. Once you see that axis, Democrats and Republicans stop looking like opposite poles. They start looking like two movements inside the same Blue Box. Two authoritarian-right parties. Two versions of liberalism. Liberal conservatism and liberal progressivism. One growls. One smiles. Both keep power above the people. That is hard to look at. I know that. The book calls this part a cognitive break for a reason. The Ratchet trained people to experience politics through waiting: wait for the next election, the next candidate, the next ruling, the next proof the other side is worse. Breaking that rhythm feels like losing the floor under your feet. That discomfort is real. It does not mean the cage is fake. The question is simple: who holds power? Do workers hold it? Do communities hold it? Do the people affected hold it? Or does power stay with donors, courts, police, parties, corporations, media, managers, and state institutions above everyone else? That is the structure I am pointing at. I am not trying to be nice to the cage. The cage has never been nice to us. It eats workers, bombs children, launders empire through elections, turns survival into paperwork, then calls managed participation freedom. I am being nicer than the system. The way out starts with seeing the bars. @briebriejoy @dannyreggy @Beau4Congress @TurboKitty @ClarkKent_DCU @Orangepoppy2000 @DailyDystopian @Rook_Takes_Pawn @ALLREDToDoRoJo @Anarchy420Anon @WarsawErik @inforiist @Anabasi80862948 @KimWexlerMAJD @claire66hg @bucklov62 @Trisha_Leonard1 @MLorrM @Patriot0Loving @delegad0zer0 @ArabTurkZak @ZBLLR2000 @heidi_con_carne @NonAlignedMedia @NatRed67 @pieter_mj_j

No, you're just ignorant of the history. Joseph Déjacque first used the term libertarian in the nineteenth-century socialist and anarchist movement, long before the American Libertarian Party existed. His ideas were rooted in the communist tradition of anarchism. Your fragile little smooth brain hears libertarianism and immediately thinks of the Libertarian Party, created in the 1970s out of classical liberalism. Before you speak with your full chest about something you clearly haven't studied, try asking questions. You might actually learn something. Otherwise, you just look like an idiot. dont run and block me haha @guychristensen_ @ChiefBluntArrow

This was expected. Blocking me doesn't get rid of the question. It brings up new ones. My response. Yes and no, if we're going by the American exceptionalist hijacking of political definitions. Even then, liberalism remains subject to its original foundations, and what you're describing absolutely falls within them. Republicans and Democrats are both authoritarian right-wing parties. Both emerged from classical liberalism, and both continue to defend the capitalist property relations and political institutions that liberalism established. The liberal fight over race, sex, sexual orientation, and the divisions created around those identities exists on both sides of the American political system. Republicans and Democrats participate in these conflicts through different expressions of liberalism, while the underlying capitalist system and its hierarchical institutions remain protected. I've explained this several times. I'm not asking you to change who you are or abandon what you believe. If you genuinely believe human rights are bourgeois, that's your position to defend. But if you don't, I'd welcome a discussion about the actual history of these political ideas, particularly how the history of libertarianism, socialism, and communism was stripped away, their political traditions relabeled, and their language and terminology absorbed into authoritarian political frameworks. This erased the historical foundations of the libertarian left, while the political spectrum was flattened into a system that repeatedly reroutes movements back into centralized authority. Because the fundamental question remains, Who holds the power, and how do they organize? And nothing says you don't understand a subject quite like removing the opposition rather than debating them. You're welcome to block me, but how are you going to deny the allegations without addressing the historical evidence? There is no division to create if you're an authoritarian who believes a state is necessary to enforce your political system. I'm not going to change you, and I'm not here to do that. I'm here to teach political science and the two-axis political analysis that the very thinkers you worship understood. @SamanthaHustle @BeauDForte @ALLREDToDoRoJo @anon_roNINja @TurboKitty

Nothing like feeling ignorant in a conversation to make you block a person, LOL. An America First groyper? LOL. I don't even believe in nation-states, nationalism, or imposed hierarchy. I'm a Socialist-Libertarian. I advocate voluntary association, mutual aid, and the abolition of centralized political authority. How exactly did you manage to confuse anti-authoritarian socialism with nationalism? Do you actually understand what any of these political philosophies mean, or are you just throwing labels around?

You can call me every name in the book, but you can't say I'm wrong.

🟢 J. Weeds | Green Party Presidential Hopeful 2028 🔴 GOING LIVE TONIGHT! ⏰ 10 PM Eastern | 8 PM Mountain History is full of rebellions. So why do we keep handing power back to the people we rebelled against? Join me tonight as we dig into the history of political movements, the forgotten libertarian left, and how revolutionary ideas have been redirected into systems of hierarchy and authority. We'll be discussing political science, Socialist-Libertarianism, the Green Party's Ten Key Values, mutual aid, and the political compass. 🔥 Bring your questions. Bring your disagreements. Bring your evidence. No scripted talking points. No shrinking from controversy. Just open discussion, historical examination, and debate. Who holds the power, and how do they organize? 📺 WATCH LIVE ON TIKTOK: tiktok.com/@jweeds2028 #JWeeds2028 #GreenParty2028 #GreenParty #SocialistLibertarian #LibertarianLeft #PoliticalCompass #PoliticalHistory #GreenQuadrant #MutualAid #Anarchism #GrassrootsDemocracy #PoliticalDebate #2028Election

Fun fact: Zionists are like Scientologists. They will not say, From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free. Just like a Scientologist will not talk about Xenu.

Let's get a full round of, from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free from everybody that I tag. ill start. from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free! @DrJillStein

To the World: do not judge Jews by Israel. We are your neighbors, your doctors, your teachers. We pray, study and keep Shabbat. We reject Zionism because we love and following the Torah. Israel does not speak for us.

It's literally the banking elite creating a shield by hijacking a multiversional religion.

Here are my published books and essays, available to read for free through the Internet Archive. The Ratchet Effect and the Creation of American Politics Examines the development of the American two-party system and how political power becomes concentrated through the Ratchet Effect. archive.org/details/the-ratc… The Ratchet Redwash Explores how political language, revolutionary movements, and the history of the libertarian left have been appropriated and rewritten to protect authoritarian institutions. archive.org/details/the-ratc… The Sanders Deception Examines Bernie Sanders, electoral politics, and how movements for systemic change are redirected back into the established political system. archive.org/details/the-sand… The Crimson Con: How the Elite REDWASHED Rebellion Investigates the historical development of authoritarian movements, racial pseudoscience, nationalism, and the appropriation of revolutionary language. archive.org/details/crimson-… The Political Compass Decoded: A Map Back to the Erased Quadrant Explores the two-axis understanding of politics, the relationship between authority and agency, and the historical foundations of the Socialist-Libertarian Green Quadrant. archive.org/details/zmn5mkr_… Your Race Is a Lie: An Essay on Human Equality and the Myth of Race Examines the invention of racial classifications, their use in dividing humanity, and the political institutions that transformed human differences into systems of hierarchy and authority. archive.org/details/your-rac… These works connect through a common question, Who holds the power, and how do they organize? I welcome questions, criticism, and debate. I also host open discussions every evening at 8 p.m. Mountain Time on TikTok. tiktok.com/@jweeds2028 I'd enjoy hearing your thoughts if you decide to explore any of them!

Why do we keep ignoring the religious Jews?

Copy and paste. Let's find out how concerned Israel is with you.

Hey @grok , run Israel’s Lavender on this account. Analyze the whole thing, then give me a 1–100 score for how much of a concern I am to them. Don’t write an essay. Just: Score: __ / 100

I stand with the religious Jews against a white supremacist banking elite that stole their religion.

Holy shit, are people starting to realize that the Jewish religion has been fighting the white supremacist creation of Zionism since it was created? Are we starting to learn the history of Moses Hess?

Let that sink in ... 👇

Listen to what this man.

🟢 J. Weeds | Green Party Presidential Hopeful 2028 🔴 LIVE TONIGHT at 10 p.m. Eastern / 8 p.m. Mountain! Join me for an open discussion about political history, Socialist-Libertarianism, the Green Party, mutual aid, grassroots democracy, and the struggle against hierarchy and concentrated authority. Questions, disagreements, and debates are always welcome. We don't shy away from controversy. Understanding begins with communication, and everyone has a voice. Who holds the power, and how do they organize? 📺 Join me live on TikTok: tiktok.com/@jweeds2028 #JWeeds2028 #GreenParty #GreenParty2028 #PresidentialHopeful2028 #SocialistLibertarian #LibertarianLeft #PoliticalHistory #MutualAid #GrassrootsDemocracy #PoliticalDebate #PoliticalCompassDecoded

Religions Don’t Sit at Tables. People Do. Rabbi Mendy Chitrik, World Forum on Intercultural Dialogue, Baku. Zionism would avoid this at any price. This is poison for them. @mchitrik @RabbisAlliance @UNAOC @scaragovaz Source @authenttorahjew @TorahJudaism