"To be a Toltec is a way of life. It is a way of life where there are no leaders and no followers, where you have your own truth and live your own truth. A Toltec becomes wise, becomes wild and becomes free again." Excerpts from ' The Four Agreements ' by Don Miguel Ruiz

25 years of lies.. 25 years of anarchy.. 25 years of hatred.. 25 years of nepotism… 25 years of corporate monopoly.. 25 years of atrocities against women 25 years of injustice against Dalits & the poor.. 25 years of attacks on minorities.. 25 years of unemployment.. 25 years of rising inequality.. 25 years of institutional erosion.. 25 years of attacks on democratic institutions.. 25 years of weakening federalism.. 25 years of price rise & economic hardship.. 25 years of division instead of development..

This man is living his best life. He goes places, clicks stunning pictures of himself, makes aesthetic reels, comes back home, and sleeps. No stress. No responsibilities.

𝗧𝗼 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗛𝗼𝗻’𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝗖𝗵𝗶𝗲𝗳 𝗝𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝗜𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗮 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗛𝗼𝗻’𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝗝𝘂𝗱𝗴𝗲𝘀 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗦𝘂𝗽𝗿𝗲𝗺𝗲 𝗖𝗼𝘂𝗿𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝗜𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗮 . The Supreme Court is the final arbiter under the Constitution of India. 𝗬𝗲𝘁 𝘁𝗼𝗱𝗮𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗖𝗼𝘂𝗿𝘁 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗱𝘀 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗶𝘁 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗶𝘁𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗼𝗰 𝘂𝗻𝗹𝗲𝗮𝘀𝗵𝗲𝗱 𝗯𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗦𝗽𝗲𝗰𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘀𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗥𝗲𝘃𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻 (𝗦𝗜𝗥). The remarks made by the Hon’ble Chief Justice that the Court “did not permit changes in Form 6” are a half-truth and an opportunistic attempt to distance the Court from its own judgment of 27 May 2026. In that very judgment, this Court explicitly endorsed the Election Commission’s residual authority. Paragraph 152 states: “It is true that Form 6, as prescribed under the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960, sets out a framework of documentation; however, the same is tailored to the process of revision contemplated under Section 21(2) of the RP Act and may not, in all situations, be capable of literal application to an exercise of the present nature…. The Commission, therefore, retains a degree of residual authority to formulate an appropriate documentation framework suited to the exigencies of a Special Intensive Revision." Paragraphs 152 to 161 of the same judgment gave full judicial cover to the special documentation regime that the ECI later enforced, including the compulsory legacy declarations. Now that the unconstitutionality, the mass exclusion, and the havoc caused by the SIR stand exposed, the Court cannot hide behind technicalities and selective memory. There can be no SIR of this nature. You cannot wash your hands of the judgment that enabled it. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗠𝗮𝘆 𝟮𝟳 𝗷𝘂𝗱𝗴𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗮 𝘁𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗖𝗼𝘂𝗿𝘁’𝘀 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗶𝗻 𝗮𝗻 𝘂𝗻𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗶𝘁𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗶-𝗽𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲 𝗲𝘅𝗲𝗿𝗰𝗶𝘀𝗲. Acknowledge your complicity. Set aside and nullify the entire SIR process from its very inception. Anything less is an abdication of the Supreme Court’s duty as the final guardian of the Constitution. Profound regards, On behalf of "We, the People of India"

अंग्रेजों के खिलाफ लड़कर जीते थे वोट चोरों के खिलाफ भी लड़कर जीतेंगे ✊

No one in the Constituent Assembly imagined that the Supreme Court, meant to be the guardian of the Constitution, would work to actively dismantle the constitution!

So hundreds of MPs cannot go and have a direct meeting with India’s CEC at the ECI office because the Home Minister of BJP won't let them. What has the Home Minister got to do with an independent Constitutional Body? Why and how can CEC not meet half the Parliament worth of MPs across party lines? Or is the ECI just a small department in MHA now already? Maybe yes.

✊

जज RH शुक्ला ने अमित शाह क़ो जमानत दी थी रिटायर होकर गुजरात के लोकायुक्त बने जज MB गोसावी ने अमित शाह क़ो केस से बरी किया, रिटायर होकर NCLT के मेंबर बने रंजन गोगोई ने तीन तलाक और राम मंदिर फैसले दिए, रिटायर होकर राज्यसभा गए जगदीप धनकड ने बंगाल चुनाव में बीजेपी का समर्थन किया, उपराष्ट्रपति बने राजीव कुमार ने 2024 तक CEC बनकर बीजेपी की मदद की, HDFC के चेयरमैन बने अब ज्ञानेश कुमार बीजेपी की फुल्ल मदद कर रहे क्या लगता है, क्या गिफ्ट होगा उनके लिए??

THE MOST ICONIC PICTURE OF 21ST CENTURY 🗿🔥

Gyanesh Kumar is a government employee like many others. Modi and Amit Shah kept him in that position, gave him immunity through new laws, made him powerful and unquestionable, and tasked him with destroying democracy, elections, and the voting system. Gyanesh Kumar created a compromised system with new processes to help the BJP win elections. The BJP won the 2024 general election and the Haryana, Maharashtra, Bihar, and Bengal elections by cheating. BJP didn’t try to cheat in Tamil Nadu, Kerala and Kashmir because they have no stakes in those places and they will get caught. CJP is asking Gyanesh Kumar to resign. If he goes, Modi and Shah will replace him with someone who will do the same job and be part of the same broken system. How can this be fixed? By cleansing the system. How? By sending the BJP and RSS home, bringing new laws, suspending the corrupt government employees and closing loopholes in the law. Why is CJP selectively targeting Gyanesh Kumar and misleading everyone that his resignation will fix everything? Why is the CJP trio not calling out Modi on this? This is a Billion Dollar question. Gyanesh Kumar is a symptom; the BJP is the disease. Will you fight the symptoms and protect the disease? Gen Z, I am not asking you to support Rahul Gandhi. But don’t entertain any fraud who use you for their career. Our country is our primary responsibility. Focus on saving the country not feeding the frauds.

INDIA has invited DMK, BJD and AAP to join the protest march from the Parliament to ECI tomorrow Those who actually wants to defeat BJP will join, but the B-Teams of BJP will not Dear Gen Z, keep a watch 🔥

Karma is catching up... The Korean made a super road but alas payments were held up by babus and netas. He named Gyanesh in his suicide note.

Strong leaders answer questions. Timid ones buy heavy PR.

What if I tell you, during the UPA Government Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh and home minister P. Chidambaram had the option to brutally detain the likes of Anna Hazare, Arvind Kejriwal, Kiran Bedi and Prashant Bhushan and the UPA had the option to cut the Lokpal protest by deploying the Delhi Police, RAF, and the anti-riot force at Jantar Mantar, and they had the option to use tear gas, water cannons, yet they still choose not to. They really did believe in a citizen's right to protest. No matter what you say, UPA Government never made India feel like anything less than a democracy. Let that sink in.

Hey @grok, Pneumonic Plague is reportedly spreading in Russia. Is this remotely comparable to COVID, or are we looking at something far more serious?

It is now established beyond doubt that Gyanesh Kumar changed Form 6 illegally and unilaterally. This is just one more proof of him abusing his position to help the BJP. He and everyone else involved in this criminal assault on our democracy will be held accountable.

According to the observation of the CJI today, Gyanesh Kumar is a...

Now that the allegations of vote theft are out in the open, can someone please publish the names of these 272 idiots who wrote letter to .@RahulGandhi way back in November 2025? Whether you like him or not, what he says comes out true in due course. indiatoday.in/amp/india/stor…

𝗜𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗮 𝘀𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗼𝘂𝘀𝗹𝘆 𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗱𝘀 𝗮𝗻 𝗮𝘂𝗱𝗶𝘁 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗹 ▪️Who ordered the ECINet changes? ▪️Who authorised the Form 6 alteration? ▪️What instructions were given to DG(IT)? ▪️Why was IT oversight changed by Maneesh Garg? ▪️How many Form 7 deletion requests were filed in bulk and by whom? ▪️How many eligible voters were wrongly excluded and later restored? ▪️And why were warnings from within the Commission itself not acted upon earlier? The Press Release by the Election Commission of India itself was admission of serious illegalities and irregularities in its conduct. 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗘𝗟𝗘𝗖𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 𝗖𝗢𝗠𝗠𝗜𝗦𝗦𝗜𝗢𝗡 𝗜𝗦 𝗡𝗢𝗪 𝗧𝗥𝗬𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗧𝗢 𝗥𝗘𝗣𝗔𝗜𝗥 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗩𝗘𝗥𝗬 𝗣𝗥𝗢𝗖𝗘𝗦𝗦 𝗜𝗧 𝗗𝗘𝗙𝗘𝗡𝗗𝗘𝗗. The Election Commission is now going door-to-door looking for ▪️-eligible Indians its own exercise "left out" after SIR▪️- an expert review of ECINet.▪️-restoration the original Form 6 process where SIR is over▪️-reviewing the very software architecture through which electoral rolls were controlled. That is not a routine “course correction”. 𝟭𝟯 𝗖𝗥𝗢𝗥𝗘+ 𝗡𝗔𝗠𝗘𝗦 𝗟𝗘𝗙𝗧 𝗢𝗨𝗧 𝗢𝗙 𝗗𝗥𝗔𝗙𝗧 𝗥𝗢𝗟𝗟𝗦 The nationwide SIR struck more than 13 crore names off draft electoral rolls across 30 States/UTs. Now, in the 20 States/UTs where SIR has concluded, the ECI has ordered officials to compare old and new rolls, identify eligible people who were “left out”, visit their homes and help them re-enrol. ▪️If the original exercise was robust, why is a nationwide recovery operation necessary? These are not minor administrative adjustments. They raise fundamental questions about how electoral rolls were handled in the first place. ◾𝟭. 𝗘𝗖𝗜𝗡𝗲𝘁: 𝗪𝗛𝗢 𝗢𝗥𝗗𝗘𝗥𝗘𝗗 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗖𝗢𝗗𝗘 𝗧𝗢 𝗢𝗩𝗘𝗥𝗥𝗜𝗗𝗘 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗟𝗔𝗪? The controversy goes much deeper than a software “glitch”. ECINet reportedly restricted Electoral Registration Officers (ERO)from exercising discretion that election law gives them. Maharashtra’s own CEO subsequently asked the ECI for four software changes precisely to restore such discretion. Then there is the most basic unanswered question- 1-Who instructed DG (IT) Dr Seema Khanna’s division to build these restrictions into ECINet? 2- Who authorised the disputed alteration of online Form 6? 3- Was there a written order? 4- Was it approved by the full three-member Commission? 5-Who gave the technical instruction to implement it? The ECI’s response to the investigation did not answer who changed Form 6. These questions need documentary answers not another press release. ◾𝟮. 𝗙𝗢𝗥𝗠 𝟲: 𝗖𝗛𝗔𝗡𝗚𝗘, 𝗢𝗕𝗝𝗘𝗖𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡, 𝗧𝗛𝗘𝗡 𝗥𝗢𝗟𝗟𝗕𝗔𝗖𝗞 Two Election Commissioners objected to the additional SIR declaration inserted into online Form 6, calling the change “illegal” and “unauthorised” and arguing that alteration of the statutory form required the Government’s involvement. After the controversy erupted, the additional declaration disappeared from ECINet in states where SIR had concluded. And now BLOs are being sent door-to-door to help “left-out” eligible voters enrol using the standard statutory process 1-Who authorised the disputed software change 2- Under what statutory authority? 3-Why was it subsequently withdrawn? ◾ 𝟯. 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗠𝗔𝗡𝗘𝗘𝗦𝗛 𝗚𝗔𝗥𝗚 𝗢𝗥𝗗𝗘𝗥 𝗡𝗘𝗘𝗗𝗦 𝗔𝗡 𝗘𝗫𝗣𝗟𝗔𝗡𝗔𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 There was already an administrative layer overseeing the IT division. Deputy Election Commissioner Sanjay Kumar routed DG(IT) files to the Commission. On July 28, while holding additional administrative charge, Senior DEC Maneesh Garg changed the work allocation and removed Sanjay Kumar from oversight of DG(IT) reportedly without consulting the Commission. This happened while Commissioners Sandhu and Joshi were themselves seeking greater scrutiny and an internal audit of the IT system. So it raises the serious questions- 1- Why was an existing layer of oversight over DG(IT) removed precisely when Commissioners were demanding greater oversight of ECINet?

Gyanesh, take accountability and resign now!