Most people on
Pump.fun are looking for the next token.
I took a different approach: find the trader first.
I came across
@notdecu and decided to look past the headline PnL.
I went through the
Pump.fun profile and checked the closed trades rather than judging the account from one winning position.
So after finding the trader, I set up a copy-trading task with
@BloomTrading instead of planning to manually chase every entry
What stood out to me was the amount of completed activity and the repeated profitable trades across different tokens.
That doesn't automatically make someone worth copying.
For me, the real question is:
Is there enough of a pattern here to justify putting this trader on my watchlist?
In this case, I decided there was.
And that's where the workflow gets interesting.
Normally, finding a trader is only half the job.
You still have to watch their activity, catch the notification, find the token on
Pump.fun, check what's happening and try to get in before the opportunity moves.
So after finding the trader, I set up a Bloom copy trading task around notdecu instead of planning to manually chase every entry.
That's the part I like about the workflow:
๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐.
๐ป๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐.
But I wouldn't copy someone indefinitely just because they had a good run.
I'd stop if the reason I selected them changed for example, if their entries became consistently weaker, their trading behavior changed significantly, or the performance that initially caught my attention stopped holding up.
So for me, the interesting part isn't:
โ๐๐ก๐ข๐๐ก ๐ญ๐จ๐ค๐๐ง ๐ฌ๐ก๐จ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ ๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ฒ ๐ง๐๐ฑ๐ญ?โ
It's:
โ๐ช๐ต๐ถ๐ฐ๐ต ๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐๐๐ฎ๐น๐น๐ ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐๐ต ๐ณ๐ผ๐น๐น๐ผ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ฐ๐น๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐น๐ ๐ฒ๐ป๐ผ๐๐ด๐ต ๐๐ผ ๐ฎ๐๐๐ผ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ป๐ฒ๐
๐ ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฝ?โ
That's a very different way of looking at
Pump.fun
Social Tasks + Tracker are live on Bloom.
Track the accounts and activity you care about. Monitor posts, follows, interactions and CAs.
Bloom is your Social trading edge.