This is why we bundled Pepe on MOSH!

Aurum going to show off the power of our Agentic Liquid Fund tech. What does it mean to get the best execution on both sides of the market, totally automated? We'll find out pretty soon.

What if the dev bundle could never be dumped? On Mosh, it can't. Bundle capital is locked forever, and agents trade it with strict hourly limits, building capital over time and keeping the market active.

the robinhood:0xb0788f5f65a9f4c0d8a634c45c391234f46221ab flywheel (EXPLAINED) just getting started... only possible on @Moshdottrade

the robinhood:0xb0788f5f65a9f4c0d8a634c45c391234f46221ab flywheel (EXPLAINED) just getting started... only possible on @Moshdottrade

Probably nothing...

Aurum is the first agentic liquid robinhood:0xc9a981fee1f9dec688bb123ccdecc63d0debfc4e fund

so is @Moshdottrade's robinhood:0x07ebb29a38fbcb41563817e5e19f2cec619c90d2 float actually decreasing, or is that just what it seems on the surface. here's what's actually happening under the hood: > 71.1% of supply held by the swarm's 3 agents right now > 8.2% separately locked in the pons launch locker > 79.3% of total supply combined, sitting outside the open market > 76.65 eth paid to backers in fees, 4.3 eth more pending collection > 958% recovery on the original 8 eth raise > 30 days since the first trade that's basically 4 out of every 5 bun already sitting somewhere it can't be sold, and that floor doesn't move backward. the locker's 8.2% is gone for good, full stop. the swarm side moves with more noise day to day. over the last 24h its own inventory dipped about ~3m robinhood:0x07ebb29a38fbcb41563817e5e19f2cec619c90d2 while agents still marked +77.1 $ETH in trading pnl, proof the swarm can run a profitable book on a day it's actually trimming. that's expected. the mandate isn't to accumulate every single day, it's to accumulate while quoting both sides over the life of the bundle, so you're going to see days it sells into strength and days it buys the dip. zoom out past the daily noise and the direction of travel is still down for float. the swarm's whole design pushes it to keep pulling bun off the open market over time, and every new mosh launch adds platform revenue that's queued up for the agentic liquid fund (ALF), still under development... but once it ships it becomes a second structural buyer stacked on top of the swarm's own mandate. that's two separate mechanisms both pointed the same direction: less robinhood:0x07ebb29a38fbcb41563817e5e19f2cec619c90d2 tradeable, not more. im bullish on this compounding. 79.3% locked today, a swarm whose job is to keep shrinking the tradeable side further, and an ALF that adds buy pressure from every other mosh launch once it goes live. the structure gets tighter, not looser, the longer this runs im watching the swarm's % and seeing when it climbs above 72% over the next few weeks, and the day the ALF ships thoughts?

I can really say this a long-term circle of great builders. this is bringing back the scent of 2021, simply opportunity to save the trenches you might mistake @Moshdottrade as just another token launch platform. but it's essentially a capital formation mechanism, token launch management system, and token lifecycle management system in one. the idea is pretty bravissimo/perfect. mosh facilitates a small raise to fund an initial bundle purchase, then uses that capital to execute a sequence of market actions; buying, graduating, adding liquidity, and more. in a way designed to avoid frontrunning. after that, the bundle moves through a series of vaults that can automate different market functions throughout the token's lifecycle. there's also combination of token control + AI market makers. instead of launching a token and leaving everything to chaos, mosh is building infrastructure around what happens after launch too. better launches. more structured liquidity. automated market functions. the goal is simple: make token launches more controlled and reduce the surface for rugs and scams. we've seen the success of $BUN and $AUR already if you're looking for a long-term community, mosh.trade for you.

@a1lon9 and @json1444 I have been calling on you two to do something about the bundle rape culture occurring on the @pumpfun app for a while now but you seem to be ignoring me ! The solution is simple !! Implement an organic scoring system for coins whereby the holders trading history is taken into account and coins with two many fresh wallets are scored lower compared to coins with genuine trading history (connected X call outs etc etc) This will reduce the likelihood of innocent people getting raped on bundled coins like what we saw today on wired, whereby many innocent investors got raped by a verified @pumpfun coin We need to beat the farmers and bundlers !

You got a lighter mate?

since robinhood:0x07ebb29a38fbcb41563817e5e19f2cec619c90d2 launched, one self-funded 8 eth bundle has paid its funder 76.65 eth back (958% recovery, basically 9.58x) in 29 days. that 'bundle' is the first product of @Moshdottrade, and it's worth tracing all the way down because every other mosh launch now runs on the same pipes mosh sits on top of a launchpad (right now pons on robinhood chain) and does 3 things: 1. raises capital for a token's opening buy 2. executes the launch in one sequence so nobody can frontrun it 3. locks the bought supply in vaults where AI agents manage the market for the life of the token. funders of that opening buy get the fee stream. robinhood:0x07ebb29a38fbcb41563817e5e19f2cec619c90d2 is the first token through it 1. wtf is a mosh bundle? a bundle is a small raise that funds the initial buy of a new token > deployer sets up the raise, whitelist optional (controls who funds and how much) > funders put in eth > part of the raise buys the bonding curve at launch > the rest stays in the vault as agent trading cash > funders receive creator fees pro-rata to what they put in so a bundle is not a presale. funders never get tokens to dump. they get a claim on fees, and the tokens stay locked 2. the launch tx purchase, graduate, add liquidity, all in sequence in one execution. no gap for a sniper to sit in every pons launch also opens with a buy tax starting at 99% that decays to 0% over 5 seconds. that tax is not burned. it goes into the same fee pool and splits the same way as trading fees. per the team, that tax alone covered bun's full 8 eth bundle inside the first minute 3. bun's bundle, the actual numbers > 8 eth raised from 1 backer (team self-funded, not crowdfunded) > 4.24 eth bought the curve → 714.3m BUN at launch, ~71% of supply > 3.76 eth stayed in the vault as trading cash > 0% creator fee, no team allocation > 79.9 eth earned in trading fees total, 76.7 eth already paid to backers, 3.24 eth pending > 29 days since the first trade current supply split, straight off the bundle page: > 71.13% held across the swarm's 3 agents > 8.2% in the pons locker > ~20.67% real float founder states only one wallet holds more than 0.5% of supply. so fdv overstates what can actually trade by roughly 5x 4. the swarm the agents are built by @uv (uv labs) on their own harness > place offchain bids and asks that fire when a uniswap tick is crossed > size, spread and skew set by volume, volatility, inventory and distance from mid > mandate on bun: accumulate bun while quoting both sides > strategy started in simulation, now tuned live on production data > the llm layer only runs on markets with real volume, to keep cost down at thousands of launches per day one example trade from the founder: bought 1.22m BUN for 2.4 eth, sold 1.26m BUN for 4.2 eth. sold more tokens than it bought and still netted 1.8 eth range liquidity management was added after launch, both at the launch tx and ongoing. roadmap from inside the vault: otc purchases, community nft mints for inventory, perps 5. guardrails > every agent action capped per period > one absolute ceiling, one % of inventory ceiling > agents cannot withdraw founder's line: "agents can't withdraw, agents can't rug." also stated plainly: agents don't paint charts, don't wash trade, don't guarantee outcomes 6. the fee waterfall this is the part that matters > every pons pool trade pays a 1% base fee > pons keeps 30% of the base fee > 0.70% left > each mosh launch can add a creator fee, slider from 0% up to pons' 10% cap > pons takes no cut of the creator fee > bundle fee income = 0.70% + creator fee > mosh takes 20%, funders take 80% > mosh also takes a one-time 5% launch fee so at 0% creator fee: 0.70% x 0.8 = 0.56%, funders earn $0.56 per $100 traded breakeven for funders, measured in pons pool volume vs bundle size: > 0% creator fee > ~179x > 0.5% creator fee > ~104x > 1% creator fee > ~74x only pons pool volume counts. cex volume and other pools pay nothing into this bun check: at 0% creator fee, 179x the 8 eth bundle is breakeven. 29 days in, the bundle's already at 958% recovery, 9.58x the raise, well past that line. 7. platform revenue > revenue: $405k all time, up from $259.6k a week ago > swarm aum: $51.7m, up from $19m a week ago > swarm agents platform wide: 42, up from 27 a week ago > total fdv launched: $73.2m up from $27m a week ago > launchpad volume: $41.2m all time, $12.2m of that in the last 7d that's roughly 2.7x revenue growth and 1.6x the agent count in a single week. bun is still the bundle with the longest track record, but the platform's now running well past a one-token test 8. the ALF next piece is the agentic liquid fund. founder: "revenues flow into the mosh ALF which buys back and trades BUN and other mosh tokens" > platform revenue from every mosh launch → ALF > ALF buys back and trades a basket of mosh tokens, bun included > acts like a cash-rich trader entering markets fresh this feature is currently "under development." so this is the only route where other launches feed bun directly. 9. $AUR, the variant bun's dragon companion, launched through mosh but paired against tokenised gold ($GLD) instead of eth. live numbers today: > 4.7 GLD raised from 1 backer, 8 days since first trade > ~50 GLD earned in fees, but 0 GLD actually paid out to backers, all of it still pending collection > recovery shows as 1061%, but that's the accrued figure against unpaid fees, not cash backers have received > swarm holds 29.7% of AUR supply 10. the backdrop > pons took 92% of robinhood chain launchpad fees over 30 days ($147m of $159m, as of sep 24) > pons v2 daily revenue peaked at ~$2m on sep 5, up from ~$10k/day early august > 7d average since sits ~28% of that peak so the base layer is cooling. mosh's pitch to pons is a longer fee tail per launch instead of burst and die. founder wants mosh to become pons' own standard 11. bullish one self-funded bundle, 8 eth in, 9.58x out in 29 days, with ~79% of supply sitting in vaults that can't withdraw. the fee mechanism is public and transparent on the bundle page itself im bullish because bun's return came from launch tax plus 0.56% of volume with a 0% creator fee, the worst setting on the slider, and it's still at 9.58x. every launch that follows sends platform revenue into an ALF that's meant to buy bun back, once it ships what im watching is the ALF actually going live, and for aur's swarm to kick in. robinhood:0x07ebb29a38fbcb41563817e5e19f2cec619c90d2

$BPEPE can now be found on @coingecko Reptiles united! Next step....Mosh tags coingecko.com/en/coins/bundl…

With the revenue Meta full steam ahead and launchpads having been the best performers on chain this cycle, it seems like dedicated infrastructure building on top of these launchpads could be massive. All it takes is one launch with a unique design to perform for it to create a new standard. I think we could see this with the advent of hooks. Paying close attention to those looking to collaborate rather than compete with launchpads.

what does this mean even? let's break it down: mosh enables a different onchain trading experience where AI agents raise money and bundle a certain % of the supply mitigating the risk of insiders dumping it turns the bundle against malicious actors. but that's not all. the AI agents are also the market makers. what $AUR is doing with this technology is pretty simple. we're asking the question: what happens if your market makers have a clear mandate to acummulate supply and never extract from the chart and they get fed with 1% of trading volume forever and that's where the tokenized $GLD pairing comes into place because what better asset to accumulate over time other than gold. there are 3 agents holding around 30% of the $AUR supply now and there are over $18k worth of $GLD in fees accumulated so far that will start flowing back to the agents as liquid trading capital very soon this makes for an interesting positioning because it makes @aurumonmosh the first agentic liquid gold fund on chain. the cat has a dragon 🐉 but the dragon also has a gold(en) flywheel