Yesterday I mentioned a project that might evolve into a new building block for token launches.
Meet
@BundleCatAI /
$BUN.
On the surface, BUN could pass for “just another memecoin.” In reality, it’s the first live test for something much larger running underneath:
Mosh Trade and its Liquidity Swarm.
Most small launches replay the same script:
Launch → early wallets load up → hype tops out → they dump → volume dries up → liquidity thins → everyone moves on.
And it’s not merely a price issue.
Most micro-caps lean almost entirely on passive AMM liquidity. There’s no one actively working the book, managing inventory, tightening/widening spreads, shifting bids and asks, reacting to changing conditions.
Yes, professional market makers do that, but they’re fucking pricey, hard to onboard, and often a black box (there's a reason why WM is so infamous).
Simply put, smaller teams or even solo devs may not even be sure if the “MM” is supporting the market or simply trading around them.
Mosh’s goal is to automate that whole role.
Instead of paying a traditional market maker, a launch raises capital to fund a large opening bundle. That bundle buys a meaningful chunk of the token supply.
Normally, one entity holding that much would scream “run.”
Mosh inverts the logic.
The bundled inventory is deposited into agent-controlled vaults, effectively the balance sheet for a swarm of AI market-making agents.
So the pipeline becomes:
Crowdfunded capital → large token bundle → agent vaults → AI Liquidity Swarm → adaptive bids + asks
The launchpad and AMM continue to serve as the launch infrastructure and baseline liquidity.
The swarm operates around it, buying and selling dynamically as conditions shift. In theory, the agents can manage inventory, tune spreads, react to order flow, and provide liquidity in places a passive AMM simply won’t.
That’s also why the first POC of Mosh, BUN’s distribution looks so strange.
About 71.4% of BUN supply sits across three swarm wallets.
For almost any other token, that would be a nightmare. Here, the concentration is the feature.
One key nuance, though:
That 71.4% isn’t burned or taken out of circulation. It’s more accurate to think of it as swarm-managed inventory. Agents can sell BUN into demand, build up
$ETH, then recycle that ETH to bid BUN when sell pressure hits.
Over time, the intended loop is:
trade → earn fees/PnL → recycle capital → deepen liquidity → support more volume → earn more fees
And this is where Mosh becomes more interesting than simply "AI market making." The capital used to create the bundle is meant to remain productive indefinitely.
Funders provide the initial capital and, instead of simply withdrawing their principal later, gradually earn it back through trading fees.
Mosh's model estimates breakeven at roughly 100× cumulative trading volume relative to the original funding, with everything above that becoming return (this subjects to change as the official docs updated with latest figures from performance)
So Mosh is effectively combining crowdfunded market making + permanent inventory + autonomous trading agents.
And
$BUN is the first live proof-of-concept (kinda similar position with
$AI from LONG).
One important clarification, though: Mosh is not really anti-bundler.
@ponsdotfamily V2 already has aggressive anti-snipe mechanics, including a launch tax that starts near 99% and decays over the opening window, alongside launch-and-buy mechanics and whitelisted launchers.
Mosh takes a different approach. It does not try to eliminate the bundle. It tries to make the bundle non-extractive.
Instead of the biggest early wallet eventually becoming the biggest seller, Mosh wants that inventory to become the token's permanent market maker.
Mosh turns the bundle from exit liquidity into AI-driven liquidity infrastructure.
Currently, they plan to refine the agentic swarm parameters and launch the liquidity swarm publicly after.