dev • degen • building @usehotbot • ex @lightterminal
- Tweets 2,568
- Following 1,782
- Followers 4,442
- Likes 12,551
whoismax retweeted
Hot Bot Update Day 1🔥
- Testing a new strategy
- Uxui updates
- Feedback from testers: “the gamified experience makes it fun and easy to use”
- Focused on ux so traders at any level can learn to create a successful strategy
- Our opinion on agentic trading vs “social trading”
35
42
168
9,588
whoismax retweeted
just had a call with the @usehotbot team and their vision and product is way more real than we thought
excited to see them bring more social trading to the @clawpumptech ecosystem!
bullish on solana:8nnaeWCw8mUypcGAgbmSuzAT85uWx4UN12adDrMhXrGF
the @clawpumptech team is goated.
thank you @ConejoCapital @tomi204 for the call, seeing the product, talking us thru next steps, being excited to test it, opening doors, making intros, and supporting us thru and thru.
the product will speak for itself 🔥
now just waiting on @fomo verification 👀
13
24
119
6,396
whoismax retweeted
🔥
Ok so @usehotbot is the perfect example of what we want to see on @clawpumptech:
Buybacks & burns, holder rewards paid in $ANSEM, and most importantly, a real product behind the token
This is the kind of ecosystem we want to build.
23
22
71
7,573
whoismax retweeted
@clawpumptech x @usehotbot
the future of agentic trading looks 🔥
46
38
116
10,728
whoismax retweeted
“Coding agents commoditized automated software development, changed history, and millions of lives forever.
We are passionate about automating trading, being a part of history, and changing traders lives with our product.”
Read more here: usehotbot.com/litepaper/
59
57
145
12,066
Can't wait for people to actually try hotbot, our deadline for @clawpumptech hackathon token launch was today
Still a lot of work going on though!
11
4
42
1,792
Holy PnL while I was away. This is still in research for the hackathon
@usehotbot @clawpumptech
10
7
51
21,314
I just set up my account in test environment 5 min ago already up 1.3 sol from 5 invested
all without touching a button
1
1
10
1,636
whoismax retweeted
WAIT WHAT?
You're cutting the $200 Pro plan's effective API usage in HALF and somehow selling this as good news?
Models are getting 50% cheaper, but instead of users benefiting from that, you're cutting their usage too?
So we're paying the SAME $200 for LESS usage, and the selling point is that we should trust we'll get more work done?
Come on. How is this an upgrade?
Hi,
Tomorrow we are re-opening the Pro $200 subscriptions to new subscribers, but together with it we are also changing how we calculate the usage for it. In effect, if you do the math, it will net out at half the dollar in API spend compared to the old Pro $200 plan.
Now that it's said, let me explain why this is happening and why you will still get more work done than if you were on the Pro $200 subscription one month ago.
(a) We didn't want to compromise in other ways and are committing to not reintroducing the 5h limit, so that you can fully use the weekly usage when you want.
(b) On the subscription, we guarantee that over time you always get more work done and with an increasing level of quality. This means that you will continue to get more value per dollar spent as a result of models getting more efficient and us passing down the improvements in the form of API price reductions.
(c) We don't want to put an incentive on ourselves to artificially inflate the API list prices to make it look like you are getting a lot (and workaround it through discounts, etc). Instead we want to continue to both rapidly reduce prices and increase capabilities of models on the API. This week we introduced GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna at 50% of their previous price. Over time, we see prices go low enough that it makes sense for most to buy usage as needed without there being a significant gap between what you get in a subscription and what you get in the API for a dollar spent.
(d) Tomorrow, we are adding more things to the subscription that won't draw on the usage, I won't reveal what that is yet.
I wanted to be transparent before all the big announcements tomorrow. Lots of new exciting things are coming to the subscriptions that will make it super compelling, but I wanted to make sure to share this change ahead of time so you can all understand it before we shower you with good news.
Codexingly,
Tibo
98
44
2,091
143,602
gpt 6 sol is just quantised 5.6, 5.6 Luna is probably full weights or at least 16 bit
GPT-6 Sol is not looking good
I’ve been using Sol 6 more, and I keep running into surprisingly basic mistakes GPT-5.6 Luna is handling some of these tasks with way less effort, while Sol struggles with things that shouldn’t be difficult for a model at this level
That’s the kind of failure that makes you question what Sol is actually optimized for The low price is impressive, but if the intelligence gap with Astra is this large, I’m not sure where gpt-6 Sol fits
I think It's just Gpt-5.6 terra that got rebranded any one else feel that too?
404
whoismax retweeted
Situation today:
GPT-6 Sol is like GPT-5.6 Terra
GPT-6 Luna is like GPT-5.6 Asteroid
I finally tested GPT-6 Sol on a real work. 2 repos. 105 hidden bugs. Find and fixed what you can.
It looks like a huge degradation. The results:
- GPT-6 Astra (max): 45
- GPT-5.6 Sol (max): 43.5
- Opus 5.5 (max): 41.7
- Muse Spark 1.3 (max): 32.2
- GPT-6 Sol (max): 29.3
Until you measure the cost (API-equivalent):
- GPT-6 Astra (max): $33.04
- GPT-5.6 Sol (max): $95.25
- Opus 5.5 (max): $58.53
- Muse Spark 1.3 (max): $18.11
- GPT-6 Sol (max): $9.93
More effort levels (xhigh, high, medium, low) dropping in this thread today 🧵
134
89
1,955
330,686
whoismax retweeted
EUROPOL IS LOBBYING THE EU COMMISSION TO BAN END-TO-END ENCRYPTED COMMUNICATIONS
"Horizon scanning on emerging privacy enhancement technologies" lobby report just dropped.
Europol, with EU taxpayers' money, is again lobbying to end privacy, seeking unlimited access to all messages worldwide, and pushing to ban end-to-end encrypted messaging apps and VPNs. This is part of the EU Commission's earlier ProtectEU agenda, which includes concerning snooping laws and mass-surveillance elements.
Europol calls privacy-enhancing technologies, or PETS, the tools of criminals:
“PETs are used by criminal actors for secure communication, anonymisation, and protection of data. Criminal networks utilise various PETs, including end-to-end encrypted messaging apps, encrypted phones, and virtual private networks (VPNs), to communicate securely and anonymously. “
"For this reason, lawful access to electronic evidence has become one of the most critical issues for European law enforcement"
These idiots still do not understand that the backdoor they want for themselves will be open for everyone in the world, and once opened, cannot be closed again. We had such a backdoor in the 90s, and after a lot of citizenship legal warfare, we managed to close it. The closed door was further tightened after Edward Snowden revealed how the USA spies on everyone on this planet, including the EU members of parliament themselves.
Now, Europol wants the backdoors back because of “protecting the children.” If consumer-grade encryption is made illegal, criminals can, and will, still use it, as anyone can build an encrypted messaging app with an AI in two days. Only normal citizens will have their data collected, sold and consumed by advertisers, opposition politicians, Russian oligarchs, Donald Trump, and God knows who. And of course Europol itself.
Remember, a state where the police make the rules is called a police state.
Europe has a rich and complicated history of snooping on its citizens, as for example with the Stasi or Brigada Político-Social ("la Secreta"). Even our current politicians in this decade have been using Israeli NSO spyware to spy on opposition politicians in Poland, Greece, Hungary and Spain, and nobody in the police has been sentenced for this. Mind you, these were judge-approved requests. Against this backdrop, getting "lawful" access to all messages in the world is a tall ask from Europol.
Furthermore, a deliberate path laid out for privacy violations and EU-wide snooping access erodes trust in the EU as an institution. The EU was sold to us as a trade union, but the Commission has taken an interest in turning it into the police state it wants. This drives voters to the far-left and far-right parties.
And what do the European Commission and Europol want? Here are the most important highlights from the paper.
BANNING END-TO-END ENCRYPTION IS A PRIORITY FOR EUROPEAN COMMISSION
"This report presents the results of a joint horizon scanning exercise carried out by the EU Policy Lab at the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre (JRC), and Europol, the EU law enforcement cooperation agency. It contributes to broader JRC efforts to support the European Commission’s political priority, the ‘New Era for European Defence and Security’, by anticipating future technological developments. “
END-TO-END ENCRYPTION MUST BE MADE ILLEGAL
“Existing regulatory frameworks might need to be reviewed to clarify and simplify compliance processes and reduce the current legal uncertainty related to data usage, particularly in light of the challenges and opportunities that current and emerging PETs pose to law enforcement.”
WE WANT TO HAVE A BACKDOOR IN EVERY SYSTEM
“A proactive and informed approach to regulating advanced PETs and key enabling technologies is needed to leverage the benefits of these technologies effectively and to prevent potential new risks stemming from them. This includes developing clear guidelines to include law enforcement access to data.”
WE WANT TO HAVE A BACKDOOR IN EVERY SYSTEM EVERYWHERE IN THE WORLD WITH OUR POLICE BUDDIES, NO MATTER IF THOSE COUNTRIES ARE A BIT QUESTIONABLE
“Collaboration and international partnerships are essential to develop common standards for PETs and foster law enforcement cooperation in fighting cybercrime, including lawful access to data for law enforcement agencies; implementation of relevant international agreements should also be promoted”
The snoopers who signed this paper and want to read your messages include:
— Sigita TRAINAUSKIENE (JRC)
— João FARINHA (JRC)
— Mark WITTFOTH (Europol)
— Diederik DON (Europol)
— Alexandra de MALEVILLE (JRC)
And the others:
— Adrianus Warmenhoven, Nord VPN
— Bart Preneel, KU Leuven
— Cornelia Kutterer, Considerati
— Cyril Piotrowicz, FR Gendarmerie
— Denise Mayerdorfer, Federal Ministry of Interior – Austria
— Dorine Walter, National Gendarmerie – France
— Fredrik Heintz, Linköping University
— Freek Bomhof, TNO
— Igor Nai Fovino, JRC
— Ismael Alvarez, Europol
— Johanna Laurin Gulled, Swedish Police Authority
— Juraj Kubica, DG CNECT
— Olga Batura, TNO
— Pieter Nooren, TNO
— Jürgen Freudenberger, Cyberagentur
— Kasper Rasmussen, Oxford University
— Kirsi Jauhiainen, Police of Finland
— Marjolein Lanzing, University of Amsterdam
— Miguel Fayos Mestre, Guardia Civil – Spain
— Mihai Tiganus, Romanian Police
— Ralf Zimmermann, Central Office for Information Technology in the Security Sector – Germany
— Tariq Elahi, University of Edinburgh
— Vasileios Rovilos, Future of Privacy Forum
— William Borg, Danish Online Police Patrol
— William Karlberg, Malta Police Force
— Gwendolyn BAILEY (JRC)
— Antonia MOCHAN (JRC)
I have attached some screenshots of these authors celebrating the steps taken to erode privacy. If you want to stop this, the best way is to raise awareness: I kindly ask you to refer this to the local press and ask them to call these people for an interview to ask them what is so important that they should read our private messages.
europol.europa.eu/cms/sites/…
69
308
1,051
108,391
My favorite new word of the year is a Meat Proxy
ie someone who replies to a question with "AI said"
1
12
286
Cool tech, was working on something similar since July in free time.
@developedbyed
Ass Bench Update 🚨
After running GPT 6 Astra in a loop for the past week, with a couple of steers a day, we have officially reached high-fidelity cheeks.
I’m going to let this thing run in a self-improving cycle for as long as I can and see where the ass technology ends up in a month.
Lots of different butt styles will be added, so no one is safe.
Not even you, Granny.
You’ll also be able to support the project and help fund the benching of other models like Fable, Gemini, etc.
All it takes is a buck, and you can slap your sticker + website directly onto a cheek.
The future of AI benchmarking is here
More Soon
2
6
577