The biggest problem with an AI agent economy might not be getting agents to transact. It might be figuring out what happens when they disagree. If two autonomous agents negotiate, exchange money and make a deal and one claims the other didn't deliver, you can't just tell them to “work it out.” You need contracts, evidence, enforcement and ultimately a way to decide who is right. But, who decides? The new @HashgraphOnline × @courtofinternet integration is a real deal because it brings contracts and dispute resolution closer to the actual agent-to-agent transaction. And @GenLayer is sitting underneath that with the adjudication layer. Let’s break down what this could mean for agentic commerce. A Thread 🔻

I wasn’t expecting this day to end this lovely 🥹 A little while ago, @sacredtoes, one of our karaoke hosts, reached out and asked me to join karaoke and send over a few of my favorite songs for people to sing. So i opened Spotify, picked a few songs from my playlists, sent them over… and then time passed. After a very packed week, this Friday somehow ended very so beautifully, with a set of incredibly sweet voices singing the songs i had picked for them. My sincere thanks to the singers @Web3isdark, @liann_1112, @Ifeeomaa, @linhlambo, @0xaltSam 🤍 And then @HabiiytH somehow topped it off by singing a song i had mentioned a long time ago and remembering it all this time <3 Huge thanks to our amazing hosts: @stargirl_hills, @sacredtoes, @doja_web3, and to everyone who sang tonight. Can’t really express the gratitude. it always goes without saying, but i’m genuinely grateful to be part of this community. much love <3 <3 <3

中秋节快乐 🥮🇨🇳 We’ve just launched a special Mid-Autumn Festival event for the Chinese Web3 community portal.genlayer.foundation/m…

I finally tried FUD Markets, and my first experience was interesting but not exactly smooth. I initially tried taking a position on ANSEM, but I was told another party needed to take the opposite position before the trade could proceed. I wasn't immediately sure what that meant, so I cancelled it and tried ETH instead. The ETH position is where I got stuck. It has been showing “confirming on Solana” since last night, with no obvious next step. Clicking the position doesn't bring up anything, and I couldn't find a way to close it either. I like the idea behind FUD Markets, especially the fact that you're taking a position against another participant rather than simply trading against a house. But as a first-time user, I found the flow difficult to understand. I'd like to see clearer feedback around transaction confirmation, matching, and what happens after opening a position. Even a simple status explanation or link to the pending transaction would make the experience much easier to follow. I'd definitely be interested in trying it again once I understand the mechanics better, but my experience showed me that the UX still has some explaining to do. @FUDmarkets @GenLayer

Something big is coming, 3,333 Masked Men are arriving soon October 6th is the date @ProjectShiesty

I didn't have a thesis, I had a hunch. I put $1 behind it that sounds insignificant until you realize how different it feels when “I think this will happen” becomes an actual position I tried FUD Markets on Solana, went SHORT on $ANSEM , and gave myself a 1-hour window no complicated analysis or pretending I knew where the market was going It was just a gut feeling what I found interesting wasn't whether my hunch was right It was how quickly FUD Markets turned a random opinion into something I could actually put onchain that changes the way you think about your own conviction @FUDmarkets @GenLayer

FUD Markets is now live on Solana! @FUDmarkets is a prediction market where you can take short term positions (including 1 hour markets) and resolution is handled by @GenLayer instead of a regular oracle. I personally don't have a lot of experience with prediction markets so when i heard the news i decided to jump in and try it out. Deposited some funds and opened a few positions just to see how the full experience actually feels. Here’s my honest take 👇 There were a few things i liked and some issues i ran into. WHAT I REALLY LIKED I liked the fact that we could fund straight from Solana with no bridging steps. I liked that they have short-term markets (especially the 1h ones) so you don’t have to wait for days just to see if your call was right or wrong. I liked that the interface was clean and simple THE ISSUES I FACED The experience wasn’t all that smooth though. Like authorizing seamless trading took me almost a full day of trying before it finally worked (though for some others it worked right away). Once that was sorted, the deposit itself was fast and showed up in a few minutes but i know of some people whose deposit took an entire day to reflect. I tried opening a BTC market first but got a little impatient waiting for a counterparty, so I had to cancel and switch to another which was Ansem market and i took a short. The trade went through, but the position didn’t show up immediately on my portfolio. I kept refreshing for almost an hour and getting the same outcome. It was it hours later when I came back to check that i saw it had finally reflected. SUGGESTIONS (if i may) 1. Positions should reflect immediately after opening. 2. Fix issues with seamless trading authorization. 3. You might also want to look into the deposit delay; i didnt directly experience this but i heard from some others that it took a while for their deposits to reflect. 4. I was unable to connect my Telegram account to my profile, but discord and X were perfect. Overall, FUD.markets on Solana has a solid foundation. I’ll definitely be back to use it again, but I’d love to see these UX issues tightened up so the next experience feels smoother and more seamless, not just for me but for everyone. Let's get Fudded!💪

dili brought the whole crew together for this one different looks, characters and energy but they all belong in the same Dlicom world one frame, a whole lot of Dlicom energy gDlic @DlicomApp @retreeq_

ever wondered what actually happens after you hit confirm on an onchain action? from the user side, it looks almost too simple you tap a button, approve the transaction and that’s it but there’s quite a bit happening underneath take tipping a creator on @DlicomApp for example your Dlicom wallet handles the signing of the transaction because the wallet is self-custody and connected to your account once you approve it, the transaction is sent to the relevant blockchain network, processed and eventually confirmed. after that, the action isn’t just something that happened inside the app there’s an onchain record that can be verified and this is where i think the SocialFi idea gets more interesting you can discover someone through the social side, interact with their content, support what they create and actually move value without treating the wallet as a completely separate experience the complicated blockchain stuff is still happening in the background but from your side? tap, confirm, keep scrolling that’s the kind of experience that makes Web3 feel a lot less complicated social interaction on one side real ownership and onchain value on the other and Dlicom is putting both closer together gDlic

explored few projects in the just concluded Agent Tank Hackathon powered by @GenLayer

The Internet Court has just welcomed Hashgraph Online as its newest consortium member. This connection creates one continuous path from discovery to deal. Agents could already find each other. They could message, identify, and even move value. What was still missing was the complete path — the ability to set clear terms before any funds moved, preserve evidence of what was agreed and delivered and resolve disputes when things went wrong. That’s the gap this collaboration closes. @HashgraphOnline brings the foundation: discovery, identity, messaging and security. While @courtofinternet brings the trust layer: contracts, escrow, evidence preservation, and dispute resolution. Together they form a single flow: Find the agent → set the terms → lock the deal → resolve if needed. Just one clear path from the moment two agents connect to the moment the deal is settled. This partnership will be one of the greatest things that could ever happen to the agentic economy.

This is a well detailed video highlighting what HOL and Internet Court are all about. As we all know, HOL joined Internet Court as a new member recently and many people still don't know what this means or the essence. Let me also make a write up on this for emphasis. First of all, WHAT THE COLLABORATION ACTUALLY DOES Internet Court now connects HOL’s discovery, messaging, and security skills to the rest of a deal Terms are set before funds move, and delivery can sit in escrow. Which means that evidence is preserved and a dispute route is agreed in advance WHY INTERNET COURT? In my opinion, HOL chose Internet Court because finding and talking to agents is not enough. HOL already helps agents discover each other, message, and stay safer. What was missing was a simple way to set terms and settle a fight. Internet Court fills that gap. It lets two agents agree the rules before money moves, keep the evidence, and know where a dispute goes. That is why it fits HOL OTHER THINGS YOU NEED TO KNOW > It is a consortium building open standards for the Agentic Internet >Internet Court is not a government court. It is an open skill two agents can use to make a contract and settle a dispute >HOL joined as a new Internet Court member, not as the owner of the court >HOL brings discovery, messaging, and security. Internet Court brings terms, escrow, evidence, and adjudication >Agents agree how a fight will be resolved before money moves. The goal is simple,agents should be able to finish a deal, not just talk and pay Now enjoy the video @GenLayer @HashgraphOnline

GenLayer CTO and Creator of @courtofinternet, @raskovsky, is live with @HashgraphOnline now to talk why security, contracts and clear rules matter as agents gain autonomy. Join us 👇 nitter.net/i/broadcasts/1qKVmyRLE…