Goyim. Job 12:24-5. We have FAKE News, Markets, Justice, Govt transparency, Money, "science", & Elections. “known liars lie.” - Hunt.

Soviet State of California
fiat-2-oblivion retweeted
This may be my favorite @themarketsniper clip. Legendary!
Okay so you are going to see ever more of this kind of announcement as the debt/fiat collapse escalates. If you think the existing banking cartel getting into custody holding your digital magic internet money is a win, you are a 'pump my bags' moron. You will get neither freedom nor your bags pumped, EXPECT regular CGT deductions from your wallet to your government if you do.
29
89
493
19,935
fiat-2-oblivion retweeted
For decades, U.S. Treasury bonds were considered the ultimate safe haven. But something changed. Since 2020, gold and bonds have been moving in opposite directions, much like they did during the inflationary 1970s. Gold is rising. Bonds are falling. The situation we're in now is similar to the 1970s - a time of growing inflation with no end in sight.
9
32
114
14,284
fiat-2-oblivion retweeted
JFK Files - CIA orchestrated the entire assassination - Links to Mossad & Israel - Ties to Rothschild family? CIA was working from Rothschild's Paris home - CIA agent Gary Underhill was murdered after revealing that JFK assassination was a CIA operation - JFK jr (son of JFK) called Joe Biden a Traitor in 1994 in a letter. Biden was a senator at that time. So all conspiracy theories came true finally
97
2,781
6,779
169,157
fiat-2-oblivion retweeted
We don’t talk about this enough
470
1,525
4,975
330,174
Parkinson’s Law – Why the State Bureaucracy Grows When the Work Shrinks In 1955, a British naval historian wrote a joke for The Economist. Seventy years later, it remains one of the most accurate descriptions of the modern state ever written. Everyone knows the slogan: work expands to fill the time available. Almost no one knows the mechanism underneath it. That mechanism explains Europe. 1. The evidence. Between 1914 and 1928, the Royal Navy lost two thirds of its largest warships. Over the same years the Admiralty – the office that ran the ships – grew by three quarters. There were fewer ships and more men behind desks. Then there was the Colonial Office, which kept growing while the colonies left one by one. It was hiring while the empire was shrinking. 2. The first mechanism. An official who feels overworked has three choices. He can resign, he can share the work with a colleague, or he can ask for two subordinates. He never chooses the colleague, because a colleague is a rival. Two subordinates are a rank. So one tired man becomes three. Then each of the two subordinates feels tired. 3. The second mechanism. Seven people now do what one did, and they keep each other busy with drafts, approvals, and comments on the approvals. Everyone works hard, and nothing is produced. You have been in this meeting. You have been copied on this email. You have watched three people sign the form that one person filled in. 4. The law of triviality. Parkinson noticed that a committee will approve a nuclear reactor in minutes, because nobody understands it. The same committee will debate the bicycle shed for an hour, because everybody does. Bureaucracy does not avoid the important question by accident. It avoids it by design – the small question carries no risk, and on the big one, someone’s name goes on the decision. 5. The ratchet. A business that fails closes. A department that fails gets a bigger budget, because the problem is now bigger. Failure is the bureaucracy’s best argument for itself. This is why the state never shrinks on its own: every problem it does not solve becomes a new office for solving it. 6. The civilizational lesson. Burnham described the managers taking over. Parkinson showed how they breed. Put the two together and you get Brussels. You get France, where the state spends more than half of everything the country produces and still cannot fix a hospital. This is not because the people inside are wicked. It is because the machine works exactly as Parkinson said it would. 7. The vindication. Parkinson was dismissed as a humorist. Then Milei cut Argentina’s ministries in half – and the country did not collapse. It barely noticed, except on the bill. The lesson is simple: you cannot reform a bureaucracy by asking it what to cut. It will always propose to cut the ships – and hire someone to manage the cut.
134
1,809
5,637
272,474
The Marshmallow Test – Why Civilizations Live and Die on Patience At Stanford, around 1970, a psychologist put a marshmallow in front of a four-year-old and offered a deal: eat it now, or wait fifteen minutes and get two. Then he left the room. Years later, the children who waited did better at school, at work, and in life. Everyone took the lesson to be about children. The real lesson is about civilizations. 1. The test. Watch the videos and you will laugh. Children cover their eyes, sing to themselves, kick the table, and lick the marshmallow without biting it. Some eat it before the door closes. You know these people – some of them are your colleagues, and one of them is you at 11 pm in front of the fridge. 2. The twist. In 2012, researchers ran the test again with one change. First, an adult promised the children better crayons and came back with nothing. Then came the marshmallow, and those children barely waited. Children whose promise had been kept waited four times longer. Patience is not only character. It is trust: you wait only if you believe the second marshmallow will really come. 3. Economists call this time preference: how much you value now over later. The interest rate is simply the price of waiting. Every civilization is a marshmallow test at scale. You plant a tree whose shade you will never sit in, you build a cathedral over three generations, you save for children you have not yet had. 4. The broken promise. Communism was the crayon experiment run on a whole nation. In Poland, money lost its value, savings vanished, and the state could take what you built. So people learned to eat now. If something appeared in the shop, you bought it, whether you needed it or not. It wasn’t because Poles were impatient. It was because they had learned the adult never comes back. 5. The four-year child. A politician has four years, and the bill arrives after he leaves. Public debt is a simple trick: we eat the marshmallow, and our children pay for both. 6. Money that rots. Inflation tells you that waiting is for fools. A decade of near-zero interest rates told every saver in Europe that the second marshmallow had been cancelled. So we got "buy now, pay later", credit for holidays, and an economy built around eating it now. Then the phone finishes the job: one-click buying, endless scrolling, a new reward every few seconds. It’s a machine designed to make sure you never have to wait for anything again. 7. The lesson. Civilization is not having more marshmallows. It is the ability to wait for them, and that ability rests on trust: stable money, safe property, promises kept. Destroy that trust and you get a nation of four-year-olds eating sweets, which is exactly what you then complain about. The West blames its people for living for today. But it was never the children who failed the test. It was the adults who broke the promise – and then sold them more marshmallows on credit.
"Socialism heroically fights problems unknown in any other system." Yes – this guy was one of our most brilliant intellectuals. Meaning a guy producing real understanding – not vapid commentary dressed up as depth. One sentence of his explains more than a shelf of political science. 1. The law. First the system creates the problem. Then it creates an office to fight the problem. Then it blames the people for the problem. Then it asks for more power to fight harder. Every step looks like a solution, and the whole thing is a trap. 2. The proof. In Poland we lived under these absurdities for 45 years. The state fixed the price of meat, so meat disappeared. Then came ration cards for meat. Then people sold meat privately at its real price, so the state made that a crime called "speculation" and set up special bodies to hunt the speculators. It was a problem unknown in any other system, and the state fought it heroically. 3. The queue. We got to know the machine deeply, from the inside, standing in line. You queued first and asked what was being sold later. People walked home wearing toilet paper rolls on a string around their necks, like trophies. And we learned to laugh about it. A man walks into a shop: "No meat?" "No, sir, here we have no fish. No meat is across the street." 4. The merriest barrack. We were called the merriest barrack in the communist camp. Other barracks were grimmer. We laughed at the queues, at the Party, and at ourselves, with jokes whispered at work and told loudly at weddings. The system had the army, the police and the press. We had the punchline. 5. The joke as knowledge. The laughter was not an escape. It was understanding. A good joke is a model of the system that fits into ten seconds. "They pretend to pay us, and we pretend to work" is a whole economics textbook in one line. The communists could censor newspapers, but they could never censor the joke. 6. The man. Stefan Kisielewski, known as Kisiel – the name of a sweet fruit jelly. He was a composer and a columnist, and readers opened the Catholic weekly from the last page, where his column was. He was the only public figure in communist Poland to openly praise capitalism from the parliament rostrum. In 1968 he called the regime a dictatorship of dimwits. Days later, "unknown attackers" beat him in the street. The tongue out was his method: a regime that demands to be taken seriously fears nothing more than a man who laughs at it – and is right. 7. The West today. Germany shut down its nuclear plants, then fought an energy crisis. Berlin capped rents, then fought a shortage of flats. Brussels writes rules that strangle industry, then launches plans to save European competitiveness. Each time, the problem is new to them. It was not new to us. We laughed because we knew. The West does not laugh yet, because it still believes. The jokes come later – right after the queues.
31
307
1,095
30,168
"Socialism heroically fights problems unknown in any other system." Yes – this guy was one of our most brilliant intellectuals. Meaning a guy producing real understanding – not vapid commentary dressed up as depth. One sentence of his explains more than a shelf of political science. 1. The law. First the system creates the problem. Then it creates an office to fight the problem. Then it blames the people for the problem. Then it asks for more power to fight harder. Every step looks like a solution, and the whole thing is a trap. 2. The proof. In Poland we lived under these absurdities for 45 years. The state fixed the price of meat, so meat disappeared. Then came ration cards for meat. Then people sold meat privately at its real price, so the state made that a crime called "speculation" and set up special bodies to hunt the speculators. It was a problem unknown in any other system, and the state fought it heroically. 3. The queue. We got to know the machine deeply, from the inside, standing in line. You queued first and asked what was being sold later. People walked home wearing toilet paper rolls on a string around their necks, like trophies. And we learned to laugh about it. A man walks into a shop: "No meat?" "No, sir, here we have no fish. No meat is across the street." 4. The merriest barrack. We were called the merriest barrack in the communist camp. Other barracks were grimmer. We laughed at the queues, at the Party, and at ourselves, with jokes whispered at work and told loudly at weddings. The system had the army, the police and the press. We had the punchline. 5. The joke as knowledge. The laughter was not an escape. It was understanding. A good joke is a model of the system that fits into ten seconds. "They pretend to pay us, and we pretend to work" is a whole economics textbook in one line. The communists could censor newspapers, but they could never censor the joke. 6. The man. Stefan Kisielewski, known as Kisiel – the name of a sweet fruit jelly. He was a composer and a columnist, and readers opened the Catholic weekly from the last page, where his column was. He was the only public figure in communist Poland to openly praise capitalism from the parliament rostrum. In 1968 he called the regime a dictatorship of dimwits. Days later, "unknown attackers" beat him in the street. The tongue out was his method: a regime that demands to be taken seriously fears nothing more than a man who laughs at it – and is right. 7. The West today. Germany shut down its nuclear plants, then fought an energy crisis. Berlin capped rents, then fought a shortage of flats. Brussels writes rules that strangle industry, then launches plans to save European competitiveness. Each time, the problem is new to them. It was not new to us. We laughed because we knew. The West does not laugh yet, because it still believes. The jokes come later – right after the queues.
Parkinson’s Law – Why the State Bureaucracy Grows When the Work Shrinks In 1955, a British naval historian wrote a joke for The Economist. Seventy years later, it remains one of the most accurate descriptions of the modern state ever written. Everyone knows the slogan: work expands to fill the time available. Almost no one knows the mechanism underneath it. That mechanism explains Europe. 1. The evidence. Between 1914 and 1928, the Royal Navy lost two thirds of its largest warships. Over the same years the Admiralty – the office that ran the ships – grew by three quarters. There were fewer ships and more men behind desks. Then there was the Colonial Office, which kept growing while the colonies left one by one. It was hiring while the empire was shrinking. 2. The first mechanism. An official who feels overworked has three choices. He can resign, he can share the work with a colleague, or he can ask for two subordinates. He never chooses the colleague, because a colleague is a rival. Two subordinates are a rank. So one tired man becomes three. Then each of the two subordinates feels tired. 3. The second mechanism. Seven people now do what one did, and they keep each other busy with drafts, approvals, and comments on the approvals. Everyone works hard, and nothing is produced. You have been in this meeting. You have been copied on this email. You have watched three people sign the form that one person filled in. 4. The law of triviality. Parkinson noticed that a committee will approve a nuclear reactor in minutes, because nobody understands it. The same committee will debate the bicycle shed for an hour, because everybody does. Bureaucracy does not avoid the important question by accident. It avoids it by design – the small question carries no risk, and on the big one, someone’s name goes on the decision. 5. The ratchet. A business that fails closes. A department that fails gets a bigger budget, because the problem is now bigger. Failure is the bureaucracy’s best argument for itself. This is why the state never shrinks on its own: every problem it does not solve becomes a new office for solving it. 6. The civilizational lesson. Burnham described the managers taking over. Parkinson showed how they breed. Put the two together and you get Brussels. You get France, where the state spends more than half of everything the country produces and still cannot fix a hospital. This is not because the people inside are wicked. It is because the machine works exactly as Parkinson said it would. 7. The vindication. Parkinson was dismissed as a humorist. Then Milei cut Argentina’s ministries in half – and the country did not collapse. It barely noticed, except on the bill. The lesson is simple: you cannot reform a bureaucracy by asking it what to cut. It will always propose to cut the ships – and hire someone to manage the cut.
45
710
2,143
96,333
fiat-2-oblivion retweeted
This is ABSOLUTELY wild. The reverse mirror image is so accurate it's almost scary. Very scary. The inverse of the 10yr yield is.... $MCD. What a sight.
402
569
6,362
1,821,366
fiat-2-oblivion retweeted
I can’t believe that after all this people can still believe that there’s a serious difference between the two parties. They both deny you healthcare, are complete puppets of Israel, support every war, & serve their Billionaire donors not the people who voted for them.
The good news is Republicans will lose the midterms. The bad news is Democrats will win the midterms, and the people will still be ruled by a corrupt capitalist duopoly where both parties serve the rich, the war machine, and Israel.
393
2,293
9,325
127,057
fiat-2-oblivion retweeted
“They are facing a danger that no one realises.” — Bhakdi I can’t believe what I’m reading Malone say here. He’s saying mRNA was the plan all along. The long game on MMR is split it into three, then grandfather those into mRNA tech. For the entire program. He’s not celebrating. Malone (@RWMaloneMD) - “That has been the plan all along.” I can’t look at that and not see Prof. Bhakdi in 2024. 20-odd years running medical microbiology and hygiene at a German university: “The ultimate goal is to install mRNA vaccines, for all vaccinations against infectious disease in the world FOREVER.” Seeing these together sends shivers down my spine.
The combination MMR injection will become three separate mRNA shots in the near future. That has been the plan all along. And yes, I think that executive order on vaccines was written expressly to encourage that. And yes, I think Sec. Kennedy's HHS will make it happen. And yes, I think Sec. Kennedy is in on it. Clearly, there a quid pro quo between Kennedy and Trump. Kennedy lets the mRNA platform platform to move forward, and he gets to stay and to work on autism/vaccine safety - from the sidelines. MAHA and all those established "anti-vax" organizations are playing along. It is not only sickening, it is pissing me off.
29
432
832
56,629
fiat-2-oblivion retweeted
Yes, we know. KRONGARD was a CIA money handler.
Suspicious trades before 9/11 were made through firm with an interesting connection to the CIA: They "were done at Alex. Brown," a firm previously run by A.B. "Buzzy" Krongard, who "then took a job as the deputy director of the CIA under George Tenet during the events of 9/11."
6
67
159
5,356
fiat-2-oblivion retweeted
Congratulations to Dr. Mary Bowden who took on the Texas Methodist Mafia. Their lawsuit against her is finally over. Fierce, brilliant and absolutely unforgiving towards the Covid Tyrants… “I lost a lot of money, but in the process, I exposed their evil ways to the world”
432
7,417
29,152
209,263
fiat-2-oblivion retweeted
It’s fascinating that one of the authors of the PATRIOT ACT, Michael Chertoff, also personally intervened to release the Dancing Israelis before they could be indicted for their role in 9/11. His mother was a founding member of the Mossad. Crazy coincidence!
532
6,768
20,555
448,720
fiat-2-oblivion retweeted
🇺🇸🇮🇱 Five Israeli employees of Urban Moving Systems were stopped in New Jersey on 9/11 after a witness reported seeing three men photographing themselves with the burning towers behind them and appearing celebratory. They were Sivan and Paul Kurzberg, Oded Ellner, Yaron Shmuel and Omer Marmari. Police reportedly recovered $4,700 hidden in a sock, two passports, a box cutter and photographic equipment. The photographs existed and were examined by investigators. The men were held for approximately 71 days and questioned before being deported for immigration violations. Urban Moving Systems was not treated as just some random moving company. The FBI searched its premises, seized computers and company records and moved the investigation into foreign counterintelligence. US intelligence sources reportedly suspected the company may have provided cover for an Israeli intelligence operation. The company’s owner Dominik Suter left the US shortly after the attacks. Ellner later said on Israeli television that their purpose was to “document the event.” x.com/saulito46107740/status…
29
202
647
35,244
fiat-2-oblivion retweeted
This is Bernard Kerik, the NYC Police Commissioner during 9/11. He travelled to Israel two weeks prior to the events. He received a $250,000 unconditional loan from Israeli billionaire Eitan Wertheimer and was paid $236,000 for two years rent from October 2001 by none other than Steve Witkoff, both of which he failed to declare. Wertheimer was on the Board of Governors for the "Jewish Agency", an organisation which surfaced in FBI files as the employer of Paul Kurzberg. Kurzberg was one of the "Dancing Israelis" arrested for celebrating with fellow Israeli employees of "Urban Moving Systems", a likely Mossad front. After being jailed on corruption charges, Kerik was pardoned by President Trump. What are the chances?
828
13,197
36,810
1,129,122
🚨The Ukraine - Russian War Was Planned Well in Advance. 🚨How USA funded AL Kaida and Ukrainian Nazis : Michael Hudson 🚨The american nightmare, Brzezinski wrote, was that Russia would get together with Germany and with Western Europe, creating russian raw materials, german industry, and somehow, finally, Russia would become westernised. 📑Brzezinski was the strategist for Jimmy Carter and convinced Jimmy Carter to say, look, the Russians are dominating Afghanistan with a civilian, secular government. Let's create a new organisation. Let's create al Qaeda. Let's back Osama bin Laden and give his supporters weapons to begin fighting the Russians. And we can pull a coup d'etat there and the Russians will fight back and then we'll say, the Russians invaded and it worked. Saudi Arabia made a deal with America that they would push the Wahhabi extremists, the al Qaeda, the very most right wing wing of the islamic parties, and it worked. Essentially, Al Qaeda is a contract army for the United States. Well, the same thing was happening in Russia. What Brzezinski wrote was that America is faced with a possibility of not being able to rule the world unilaterally, and that would be a disaster for democracy, that we can't let any country's economic ability to be self sufficient means potential military power. And in order to prevent any country from threatening America militarily, you have to prevent it from developing economically. The american nightmare, Brzezinski wrote, was that Russia would get together with Germany and with Western Europe, creating russian raw materials, german industry, and somehow, finally, Russia would become westernised. America, under Brzezinski's strategy, said this would be a disaster, because if Russia is westernised, if it becomes democratic, if Europe and Russia are prosperous, then we cannot control them anymore and they will have no reason to be NATO. We've got to stop Russia. And the place to stop this russian european conglomeration is to split it right at the border down Ukraine. Let's do in Ukraine what we did in Afghanistan. Let's back the crazies. Well, most of them are the former neo nazi groups that have been so prominent that.
13
207
352
23,581