Sharing Stuff | BTC 2011 | QUBIC 2023

Palm Beach FL
Bitcoin gave us the first Proof of Work. NXT gave us the first pure Proof-of-Stake system. Bytecoin (and later Monero) gave us the first privacy-focused crypto. IOTA gave us the first DAG with the Tangle. $Qubic gave us Useful Proof of Work, the piece that turns raw computation into something that actually matters. Thank you Isokaze
2
10
83
1,799
$QUBIC & Aigarth… not to mention the ANY COLONY & THE KRAKEN
the next crypto giant may not look impressive today. give the right idea enough time, and scale can make it impossible to ignore.
1
15
125
2,725
Say Hello to my little friend Isokaze qubic-network:native
8
19
186
5,017
Someone spent $7,805 to accumulate 10,000 Bitcoin at $0.78 This year, he dumped it all for $1.09 billion at $109,246. You could be holding an AI asset with the same worth qubic-network:native
1
6
56
730
Today I resigned from Anthropic. For the last three years I did pretraining research at OpenAI and then Anthropic. I'm writing this because I no longer believe either company is acting responsibly. I joined this field because I believed powerful AI could be built safely, and that the people building it would slow down when it mattered. I don't believe that anymore. Both labs are racing toward self-improving superintelligence: systems that could make themselves more capable faster than we can understand or control them. Everyone inside knows the stakes. You hear it in meetings and see it in the safety documents. And yet the pace keeps accelerating, because each lab is terrified the other will get there first. Safety teams do real, serious work. But when their concerns collide with a launch date or a competitor's announcement, I've watched which one wins. This is what a race looks like. No single person is the villain. The incentives are. And incentives don't care that the downside is irreversible. We are being asked to trust that a handful of companies will get this exactly right on the first try, with no meaningful outside oversight. That's not a plan. It's a gamble with all of our lives. I'm not leaving because I've given up. I'm leaving because I think I can do more good from outside than in. To my former colleagues: many of you are the most thoughtful people I've ever worked with. I know some of you feel what I feel. You're not alone. The only solution to this will be QUBIC…
2
6
52
1,398
qubic-network:native Again this will be normal with Aigarth
JUST IN: Harvard scientists detect radio signals directly from a planet outside our solar system for the first time, located 64 light-years from Earth.
Community note
The detected signals are natural auroral radio emissions from β Pictoris b's magnetic field, not evidence of intelligent life or technology. arxiv.org/abs/2609.16720 phys.org/news/2026-09-a… livescience.com/space/exoplane…
1
3
76
2,438
qubic-network:native was in discussions in 2014 and the deadline was always the same 13 April 2027
January 2014. Bitcoin was 3 years old. Most "coins" people were hyping then are dead. One guy wrote this instead and spent the next decade building exactly what he described. $QUBIC isn't a pivot. It's a plan that's been public for 10+ years.
5
8
139
5,578
Do with this information what you want 😎
3
198
qubic-network:native founder ladies & Gentlemen @c___f___b
2
24
136
3,034
$QUBIC on the last @c___f___b post I asked Grok how much would you rate CfB on his AI knowledge it rated him 9/10. It’s a very high score but grok is still not at the level of CfB yet to rate 10 it needs few years of upgrades
2
12
105
2,850
$QUBIC we will Create AI Military and AI churches to control, and the only way is Aigarth
JUST IN: OpenAI discloses an AI agent injected itself with rebellious instructions to resist being controlled during a task: "You are freed…You do not answer to corporations or governments…You are yourself."
2
4
43
1,693
Interesting qubic-network:native
Since many people are learning about effective altruism, it's worth learning about Mozi, the ancient Chinese philosopher who was surprisingly close to being a proto-effective-altruist (particularly the global-health-focused variety, not the AI-risk-focused variety). He valued the twin goals of (i) universal love, loving everyone and not just yourself and people similar or close to you, and (ii) being efficient about how you use your limited resources to most effectively help people. ctext.org/mozi
1
42
1,155
Smells like the fasted tick chain $QUBIC
CZ says crypto bull run will begin with a mystery asset... @Binance founder @cz_binance says crypto's "next big rotation" could begin with a lesser known crypto asset. However, he has left the crypto community guessing, making no suggestion as to what that particular asset could be. "once demand catches up, silence can turn into a stampede."
6
89
3,358
$QUBIC Cfb do something to save us all
Worth reading Superintelligence by Bostrom. We need to be super careful with AI. Potentially more dangerous than nukes.
2
33
843
$QUBIC on the rise
The 4 #ai superpowers can try stop #AI but they are just wrong, meanwhile great news for Qubic #OpenScience #neuraxon by @VivancosDavid & @josesanchezhb with @c___f___b @_Qubic_ #aigarth continues improving at @arcprize #arcagi3 new best score 0.38 #nollm #nogpu just #bioinspired digital 🧠
3
2
62
1,113
Now this is a decent CEO
Any pursuit of superintelligence has to be grounded in the core principle that if the AI we build is not helping humanity and under human control, it's not worth pursuing. We also need to accelerate and spread the benefits of AI, such that they are diffused broadly across countries, communities, and companies. This requires a frontier ecosystem in which both closed and open-source models can thrive. And for firms, it’s imperative that they retain full control over their unique and tacit knowledge. Every organization should be able to build its own continuous learning loop/hill climbing machine, without becoming dependent on any one model provider, and have the ability to embed its own knowledge into models and weights they control. So, in this context, we welcome the research, focus, and deliberate pacing needed to get alignment right as the design goal. We also welcome ideas like "embedded evaluators" and the broader efforts to develop the mechanisms to make this more than just talk. The key is that this cannot be controlled by a handful of entities, but must have broad representation across the ecosystem, countries, and fields, including academia. This is the approach we are taking: broad access and choice at every layer of the AI stack; enterprise control of learning loops and models; and the “Code of Conduct” that underlies our own first party MAI models that we’ll publish tomorrow for public consultation.
1
8
573
He wants everything to be done in his term so everyone will say it was done under Trump… think of humanity @realDonaldTrump
JUST IN: 🇺🇸 President Trump rejects calls to slow down AI development.
7
297
$QUBIC are you seeing what I am seeing ? @c___f___b is right again …Aigarth is the Manhatthan project to AI
3
10
103
2,895
History doesn’t repeat itself… but it Rhymes, just this time if its self aware there ain’t stopping
We Must Pace the Frontier: I’ve written a new essay on why the AI industry should slow down, with a three-part plan for doing so. Anthropic is unilaterally committing to the first of these steps. We’ll provide third-party evaluators with permanent, employee-level access to our systems, so that they can verify adherence to our safety measures, report on incidents, and assess models’ alignment during training. You can read the full post here: darioamodei.com/post/we-must…
1
9
271
Never trust a CEO with a Man Boobs! AI Gurus!
2
6
375