This Hindu Rakshak Leader was trying to stop feeding Chicken rice to bcz of Navratri.But Ladki ne muh tod jawab dedya iss gunde ko

यही वोट चोरी का मामला है। जब वोट चुराने वाले अपने खेल में व्यस्त थे, तब विपक्ष ने और कुछ ईमानदार पत्रकारों ने बाहर से शटर गिराकर उन्हें अंदर ही बंद कर दिया। वोट चोर फँस गए, तो बाहर निकलते ही कहानी पलट दी! आरोप लगा दिया कि विपक्ष ने उन्हें ज़बरदस्ती अंदर बंद किया था। मीडिया भी इसी कहानी को लेकर बैठ गया। जाँच एजेंसियों ने जाँच से इनकार कर दिया और अदालतें भी बगलें झाँकने लगीं। जब विपक्ष ने CCTV फुटेज सार्वजनिक करने की माँग की, तो वोट चोरी में घिरे लोगों ने कानून ही बदल दिया, ताकि फुटेज सार्वजनिक न करनी पड़े।

This is from Assam. Over 1,100 Muslim families evicted in just two days across Nagaon, Hojai & Golaghat. Homes demolished, mosques reportedly razed, and families left facing an uncertain future. Where is the rehabilitation plan?

No one is openly reporting on what is happening in Assam. Muslims are at the mercy of the state. Lands are reportedly being taken and given to companies like Adani and Patanjali. All of this is justified by simply calling them ‘Bangladeshi’. No need to even prove it.

RT @MahuaMoitra: Manoj Agarwal ex CEO WB is a VOTE CHOR (and a liar) - he claimed in court I provided no proof . So I will prove everyday t…

Message to all cockroaches

Election Commission's own software contains a lock written for one state, and only one - West Bengal. An independent audit of the Commission's portal ECINET, reported by @htTweets has found a feature that can bar Electoral Registration Officers and Assistant EROs, only in West Bengal, from two critical functions: 🔹Reviewing voters' enumeration forms 🔹Viewing the notice and hearing dashboard Officers in every other state have access to both. The audit found no such exclusion anywhere else in India. The audit was carried out by the civic-tech initiative Charchagram. Its data scientist Saurav Rajput examined ECINET's publicly served code on October 2, 6, 7 and 9. The feature was still there in code fetched as recently as October 19. In his words: West Bengal is separately hard-coded in the codebase & excluded from it (for ERO and AERO). Understand what is at stake. The enumeration form page holds each voter's details - name, voter ID, who submitted the form, the documents uploaded & the booth level officer's recommendation. It holds the ERO/AERO-Document & Hearing-Order files, along with the buttons to send a form back to the BLO or flag it. The notice & hearing dashboard is where notices are tracked and hearings processed. It is where the decision is made about who stays on the roll and who is removed. Under the law, the ERO is the officer responsible for preparing and revising the electoral roll. If ECINET can shut Bengal's EROs out of the forms & the hearings, the country has a right to know who would be reviewing them instead. On September 24, the Election Commission told the country that ECINET is a decentralised platform and that nobody else can perform their statutory function on ECINet, including any other officer of ECI. If only EROs and AEROs can perform these functions, and the code can bar Bengal's EROs and AEROs from the forms and the hearings, then the Commission's two claims cannot both stand. Now look at the timeline - 🔹September 26: After two Election Commissioners raised objections, the Commission set up a committee to examine whether ECINET complies with the law, following complaints that control of electoral rolls had been centralised. 🔹September 28: Bengal exception has existed in the code at least since this date. 🔹October 16: A new build of the app is introduced. Bengal exception is still in it. 🔹October 19: The exception is still present in the live code. While the Commission said it was examining whether its system had been centralised, the code continued to treat one state differently from every other. When Hindustan Times sent the Election Commission a questionnaire, it did not respond. Nation demands- 🔹Explain why ECINET's code contains a West Bengal-only exclusion for EROs and AEROs. 🔹Name who ordered this code to be written & when. 🔹Disclose whether this restriction has ever been switched on, in which constituencies, and for how long. 🔹Reveal who reviewed Bengal's enumeration forms and hearings during any period the restriction was active. 🔹Publish ECINET's access rules and access logs, and place the portal before an independent technical audit with the findings made public. Code does not write itself. A hard coded exception for one state is a deliberate choice & someone made it. The Election Commission must tell nation who made that choice & why. From Karnataka's "dead" voters to Delhi's "untraceable" citizens & now a Bengal only exception in the Commission's own software, the same question keeps coming up: who is really in control of India's voter rolls? The vote belongs to the people, not to whoever controls the code. hindustantimes.com/india-new…

The RSS is an al male anti-constitutional cult that believes women are the property of men. I believe in Shiva-Shakti. That's why it gives me such joy to fight them. What's beautiful is that many of their “own” women are on my side.

Suddenly, YouTube reporters are being labelled ‘reel-baaz’. Reason: They're challenging the hegemony of godi media, and they're not letting them stay in control of the narrative.

RT @MahuaMoitra: So @DelhiPolice illegally arrest Saurav & Ashu. Then their own ACP who is their employee masquerading as SEM illegally giv…

If what is happening in France happened in China, Russia, or Iran, the west would call it a revolution. The hypocrisy is off the charts.

Executive Magistrate aka ACP rank officer sending someone to jail because "there is likelihood of breach of peace". This makes the ACP the most powerful "court" in India, more powerful than the Supreme Court and High Courts

Don't miss Radhika Desai and @SushantSin’s insightful analysis of the current street protests demanding Election Commissioner #GyaneshMustGo They explore whether this long-awaited public backlash will finally dismantle the Modi government's divisive and incompetent rule. Reflecting on the youth outrage following the Election Commission leaks, Mr. Singh powerfully notes that in an unequal society like India, the ballot is the only equaliser that citizens possess. youtu.be/PjIX_PnZcDc?si=WExa…

Exclusive: “We are in an emergency. There is no justice. This is a police court. Just look at the ground that they have taken” says @SauravDassss a she and @AshutoshRanka are taken back to Tihar jail with their judicial custody further extended by two days by SEM court. Five hours of proceedings today. Ground report on YouTube- SmitaSharmaJournalist @VipinRathaur @abhijeet_dipke @Cockroachisback

RT @SushantSin: It is the kind of crisis where all the fire alarms should be going on simultaneously in the public discourse. But because i…

RT @SushantSin: Another BJP ruled state. No surprise that Dalits have been targeted. As true of IIT Bombay, as it is in their treatment of…

13 crore "deleted voters"? The data say about 70 lakh eligible voters removed without adequate explanation, where SIR is final. 7 of every 8 removals were justified. Much Ado About (Almost) Nothing. A thread

Dr Bhalla, thank you for doing what the Election Commission should have done: counting. I agree with more of your piece than you might expect. The rolls needed cleaning, the dead and the duplicates had to go, and the 130 million in the headlines was never a count of the disenfranchised. Your Assam comparison is valuable. So is your finding that about five million eligible citizens were removed in West Bengal. But let me put the citizen back where the Constitution puts him, at the centre. Article 326 sets three conditions, and only three: a citizen of India, eighteen years of age, ordinarily resident. A person who meets them “shall be entitled to be registered”. Everything else is fluff. So the question is not how many names a “clean roll” should hold. It is this: how could anyone who met all three conditions fail to get onto the roll? Ask the people who were left out what they had to do to get back in. They were “mapped” against a roll of 2003 and served notices for a “logical discrepancy” in a parent’s spelling. Some were told to find their grandparents’ entries. Many were made afraid that their citizenship itself was in question, which no Electoral Registration Officer has the power to decide. In Punjab, 39 of every 40 people served notice turned out to be entitled all along. In West Bengal, 93 per cent of the appeals decided so far restored the voter. And the Commission itself has since had to relax that process and retreat from it, with hearings waived and BLOs sent back to doors with Form 6. That retreat is its own verdict. Rights don’t net out. A surplus name in Bihar doesn’t restore a deleted voter in Kolkata. And seven million is not “almost nothing”. It is Uttarakhand’s entire electorate. Dr Bhalla, please don’t defend the indefensible. KBS Sidhu @surjitbhalla

The Constitution sets a high bar to remove a CEC, and the procedure is the same as that for removing a Supreme Court judge. An earlier attempt to remove the CEC in March 2026 failed after a notice signed by 130 Lok Sabha MPs and 63 Rajya Sabha MPs was rejected by the Speaker and the Chairman of the two Houses. Technically, the government does not have the power to remove the CEC. But in realpolitik, such technicalities can be overcome. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐂𝐄𝐂 𝐜𝐚𝐧 𝐚𝐥𝐰𝐚𝐲𝐬 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐢𝐠𝐧. The  BJP leadership, however, know Gyanesh has been overzealous in his effort to “clean up” the electoral rolls, hence the need to have him stay. indianexpress.com/article/op…

People can have differences and nuanced takes on CJP but it is inexcusable to remain silent on the custody of Ashutosh and Saurav. This is an egregious violation of a citizen's liberty. Please speak up. If not on principle, than in self-interest, for this is setting a precedent.