ACII is the voice for the next generation of American consumers and investors who participate in U.S. financial markets.

Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Minimum likes
.@BetterMarkets claims to represent American retail investors. But their primary funder is billionaire hedge fund manager Michael Masters. Investors deserve to know whose interests are really being served. Learn more: aciinstitute.org
21
.@JPMorganAM manages over $4 trillion in client assets — and walked away from @issgovernance & @GlassLewis entirely. When one of the largest asset managers in America loses confidence in the duopoly, every institutional investor still following their recommendations should ask themselves why.
41
How can @BetterMarkets fight for the public interest when their entire operation is funded by a single billionaire? That is not advocacy. That is a conflict of interest.
37
The @SECGov's accredited investor definition has not been meaningfully updated in over 40 years. The idea that wealth automatically equates to investment competence deserves a serious rethink.
1
1
90
.@SteaknShake is right — we need to stop letting passive capital protect active incompetence from proxy advisory grifters like @issgovernance and @GlassLewis.
America’s corporate governance system is broken, and it’s killing public companies. Look no further than Cracker Barrel: Decades of brutal mismanagement have seen one incompetent CEO after another walk away with a massive paycheck while customers and actual shareholders take a beating. Why does this keep happening? Because proxy advisory firms like ISS are corrupt. They blindly rubber-stamp failing boards year after year, protecting the corporate elite while burning shareholder value to the ground. The root of the rot is index funds. There's no question that indexing one's money is a smart financial move for most people. But just because you passively index your investments doesn't mean your corporate votes should be handed over to the managers of your fund so they can play politics. Right now, passive funds hold massive, unchecked voting blocks while having zero skin in the game themselves. It is time for a simple rewrite of the rules: We need to index the votes of index fund investors. Passive index funds should be forced to automatically split their votes to proportionately mirror those of retail and active institutional shareholders — the people actually doing the research, risking their capital, and fighting for performance in the companies they hold shares in. No more rubber-stamping. A change like this will immediately strip corrupt gatekeepers like ISS of their toxic influence. True accountability happens when lazy, overpaid boards actually answer to the stakeholders they represent, rather than screwing them over. Actual, logic-driven governance when your money is passive happens when your vote passively follows the voting decisions of the actual market. We need to stop letting passive capital protect active incompetence. By stripping index funds of their arbitrary voting power and empowering engaged investors, we will finally torch corporate cronyism and usher American capital markets into a golden age of capitalism.
1
1
160
.@TheJusticeDept rescinded the 1987 letter that gave @issgovernance a free pass on antitrust scrutiny for nearly 40 years. The question was never if the proxy advisory racket would be exposed. It was when.
44
Under current @SECGov rules, a knowledgeable entrepreneur may be unable to invest in private markets simply because their net worth falls below the threshold. Competence and experience should count. The INVEST Act would begin to fix this.
1
2
51
The accredited investor definition has not been meaningfully updated in over 40 years. Wealth thresholds from 1982 should not determine who gets to build wealth in 2026. ACII believes it is time for a definition built on knowledge, not net worth.
1
2
47
Proxy advisors frequently call for greater transparency from public companies. The exact same standard should apply to them. ACII thinks investors deserve to know how these recommendations are developed, the assumption used, and potential outside influences.
1
2
68
For too long, @issgovernance and @GlassLewis have enjoyed outsized influence over corporate America with no explanation and no accountability. Greater competition would mean better analysis, fewer conflicts, and stronger protections for those who deserve it. proxyadvisorwatch.com/
1
2
70
.@issgovernance calls itself a neutral advisor. Its parent company, Deutsche Börse AG, has publicly committed to net-zero goals. Make that make sense. Investors deserve to know whether the advice they are paying for is truly impartial.
2
84
Corporate governance should never be a partisan issue. Americans across the political spectrum deserve transparency from proxy advisors @issgovernance and @GlassLewis.
2
53
.@KenPaxtonTX just filed suit against @GlassLewis for violating the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act. The allegation: advertising objective advice while prioritizing a private agenda over investors' financial interests. Con men. Plain and simple.
JUST IN: Texas moves to hold the Proxy Advisory Duopoly accountable for deceiving consumers and pushing the woke agenda. Let's break it down👇 Texas Attorney General @KenPaxtonTX has filed a lawsuit against one of the two main proxy advisors in the proxy advisory duopoly, @GlassLewis, alleging that the foreign-owned firm made false representations about its services to investors across the country, including in Texas and violated the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act-Consumer Protection Act. The lawsuit argues Glass Lewis's advertising is deceptive and fails to inform client of its ESG priorities. This is HUGE — Glass Lewis has spent years prioritizing racist DEI quotas, climate activism, and other outdated ESG policies while claiming to serve investors' financial interests. This deception is not just financially reckless but also illegal and must be met with consequences. This lawsuit is just another example of Texas leading the way to stop woke agendas and protect consumer investments from political activism.
1
1
2
211
As proxy advisors have expanded their influence, the debate over whether existing oversight has kept pace has grown louder. Investors deserve confidence that recommendations are tailored, objective, and focused on shareholder interests — not political agendas.
1
1
2
104
Shareholder voting is not meant to be "copy, paste, vote." Every proposal deserves thoughtful analysis, not recommendations generated from the same playbook. Learn More: proxyadvisorwatch.com/
1
2
64
.@WSJ reported that roughly 71% of @exxonmobil shareholders supported moving the company's headquarters to Texas — even after @issgovernance and @GlassLewis urged investors to vote no. Shareholders saw through it.
2
84
The SEC has received dozens of complaints from public companies alleging factual errors and overly standardized recommendations from con men @issgovernance and @GlassLewis. Investors deserve advice that is accurate, transparent, and tailored — not one-size-fits-all.
1
2
328
Two foreign-owned firms. Enormous influence. Almost no public scrutiny. @issgovernance and @GlassLewis have operated in the shadows for far too long. Learn who is really influencing corporate America: proxyadvisorwatch.com/
1
3
103
.@elonmusk was one of the first major voices to say out loud what many already knew: @issgovernance and @GlassLewis are running a racket. The lawsuits, the investigations, and the executive order suggest he was right.
1
2
87