Here's the settings I personally use on thestonkboard.com/robot-mine… Yearn mode ✅ >= .1% ✅ Peep the distribution. Peep the mcap. Peep the chart (jtx links are refs that support the site / jtx provides a quickly accessible charting suite for eco coins) Peep the x acct. Anyone interesting following? Are the posts slop? If the vibes feel right, I ape. The mines show you what stonkfun eco whales (potentially aligned players) are doing IN REAL TIME. I don't ape everything I see, but 99% of what I do ape, I discover in the mines. Happy mining!

Liquidity incentives. Most DEXs have them. @StaticsProtocol will not be any different. We are not a ve(3,3) clone, however. I have borrowed a lot from the bribes and gauge systems made famous by Curve and Aerodrome, but this is not the same. Let us look at what we have here. $STATICS has a Gauge Reserve. Each week a % of this reserve is allocated to liquidity rewards. These rewards are then distributed to market LPs who have ACTIVE RANGE liquidity. Each week $STATICS stakers can point their stake at any pool they choose. For example, if I have 100K $STATICS staked, I can direct 50K to Pool A and 50K to Pool B. If I was the only staking allocator in the system, then the weekly rewards budget would go 50% to Pool A and 50% to Pool B. Those rewards are then distributed to the LPs based on active liquidity like a classic gauge. If there is no liquidity to reward those rewards are recycled back through the guage. We also built a bribe system internal to this that allows market creators to choose up to 4 reward asset slots that can be permissionlessly funded. A creator can split these slots between LPs and $STATICS allocators. This creates incentives for LPs as well as stakers to allocate more protocol rewards to your LPs. If a creator wants to attract LPs, they could choose 80% LPs and 20% allocators, for example, and because there are 4 available slots, you are not stuck with one asset for incentives. The Gauge Reserve, which holds the gauge rewards budget, releases a configurable % of its total balance each week. If it is set to 5% and holds 10M $STATICS, the first week would release 500K $STATICS for protocol incentives. This reserve will be perpetually funded by buybacks as well as from trading and activation fees received by the treasury. See, no programmatic burns are starting to make a lot of sense, aren't they? If this reserve grows to 20M and is set to 5%, the next week's reward budget would be 1M $STATICS. So not the same as ve(3,3), but similar and designed from first principles to recycle $STATICS instead of infinite mints and infinite sell pressure. Couple this with the fact that $STATICS is needed to allocate as well as earn standard rewards, and things look real interesting.

We need gaybear/sqqq deployed and rugged as a blood offering

IMO difference between stonk / believe is that believe was like if stonk gave all the taxes straight to pasternak

yw frens, enjoy.

theyre calling him the fomo fondler.

hey... Hear you guys... Can't do this bc the board doesn't show favoritism. I will implement a general filter you can use to exclude any base asset you'd like.

logging onto ct looking for @inversebrah like

New crypto FAQs: sec.gov/about/divisions-offi…

Think about how bad it is. It’s even worse than that. Think about it again. It’s still worse than that. You think you thought about it? Nope, even worse than that. Imagine the worst case scenario. Worse than that. Re-read this tweet. Think about it again. Still worse. 🍝

*SEC STAFF ISSUES FAQS ON CRYPTO ASSET SECURITIES LAWS APPLICATION *SEC STAFF: TOKEN BUYBACKS ON FUNCTIONAL PROTOCOLS DO NOT CONSTITUTE MANAGERIAL EFFORTS *SEC STAFF: LIQUID STAKING TOKENS ARE DIGITAL COMMODITIES OR TOOLS, NOT SECURITIES *SEC STAFF: MAINTENANCE, ENHANCEMENTS, SYSTEM GRANTS NOT CONSIDERED ESSENTIAL MANAGERIAL EFFORTS *SEC STAFF: PROMOTING CRYPTO UTILITY WITHOUT PROFIT CLAIMS GENERALLY NOT AN INVESTMENT CONTRACT

hello cousins (Ignore me saying this is going to be short at the beginning.. bc yeah it's not)

Be less bothered by ppl trashing your bags. It shouldn't change the outcome if you're right.

The Water Lord

Think this goes without saying (hopefully) but if you are heavily allocated to things where the underlying is an illiquid shitcoin itself ... Study this. Just tread carefully... Understand the risks you take.

Me and my portfolio