Good job @ChatGPT Working hard for a long time. CC @sama

First known dialog of two AIs

AI can write an answer, but only a human can write a feeling.

AI theme

AI theme. Actual Intelligence.

Test Like You Fly | spacex.com/content/starship/…

He delivered and over delivered once again:

When Elon becomes a Trillionare he can easily follow 4% rule and spend 40B a year and never run out in of money. Just think about it. It is actually fascinating.

If you could build products that take people's time away (Facebook, YouTube) or products that give people their time back (Uber, Zingage) - which would you choose?

Happy Spring every one! Happy Sunday Go Gophers.

All my new code will be closed-source from now on. I've contributed millions of lines of carefully written OSS code over the past decade, spent thousands of hours helping other people. If you want to use my libraries (1M+ downloads/month) in the future, you have to pay. I made good money funneling people through my OSS and being recognized as expert in several fields. This was entirely based on HUMANS knowing and seeing me by USING and INTERACTING with my code. No humans will ever read my docs again when coding agents do it in seconds. Nobody will even know it's me who built it. Look at Tailwind: 75 million downloads/month, more popular than ever, revenue down 80%, docs traffic down 40%, 75% of engineering team laid off. Someone submitted a PR to add LLM-optimized docs and Wathan had to decline - optimizing for agents accelerates his business's death. He's being asked to build the infrastructure for his own obsolescence. Two of the most common OSS business models: - Open Core: Give away the library, sell premium once you reach critical mass (Tailwind UI, Prisma Accelerate, Supabase Cloud...) - Expertise Moat: Be THE expert in your library - consulting gigs, speaking, higher salary Tailwind just proved the first one is dying. Agents bypass the documentation funnel. They don't see your premium tier. Every project relying on docs-to-premium conversion will face the same pressure: Prisma, Drizzle, MikroORM, Strapi, and many more. The core insight: OSS monetization was always about attention. Human eyeballs on your docs, brand, expertise. That attention has literally moved into attention layers. Your docs trained the models that now make visiting you unnecessary. Human attention paid. Artificial attention doesn't. Some OSS will keep going - wealthy devs doing it for fun or education. That's not a system, that's charity. Most popular OSS runs on economic incentives. Destroy them, they stop playing. Why go closed-source? When the monetization funnel is broken, you move payment to the only point that still exists: access. OSS gave away access hoping to monetize attention downstream. Agents broke downstream. Closed-source gates access directly. The final irony: OSS trained the models now killing it. We built our own replacement. My prediction: a new marketplace emerges, built for agents. Want your agent to use Tailwind? Prisma? Pay per access. Libraries become APIs with meters. The old model: free code -> human attention -> monetization. The new model: pay at the gate or your agent doesn't get in.

Ninguno supera este momento.😁

This video deserves the prize of the best video all over the internet so far.😆😆😆 the yellow crocs 😂😂😂

Great products are not built by tired. They are built by inspired.

Source code is a liability, not an asset.

Hey @elonmusk Can we get a Tesla vehicle for a family with 5 kids and parents of a size that would allow us to go for a trip and also get a lot of stuff with us? We kinda want to increase a population, but there is no good options for families of this size expect escalade...

Some tasks aren't meant for humanoids - 300 bowls/hr - 60 sqft footprint - Fully automated assembly & bagging: Staff preps then leaves for day - 40% all-in labor savings - Profitable restaurants up & running Restaurateurs reserve your Bowlbuilder today: lab37.us