Covkid 🇮🇱 retweeted
Trending Story: Saudi Arabia has exe/cuted two Bangladeshi nationals, Nazrul Islam Abdul Basir and Siri Akhtar, following conviction of immoral sexual act inside a mosque in Mecca. The “immoral act” was apparently a kiss on the forehead. They were newlyweds who decided to spend their honeymoon in Mecca. According to reports in Bangladesh, Saudi authorities refused to consider they were a couple, and the forehead kiss was an expression of appreciation to Allah for a beautiful bride. Their bodies have arrived in Bangladesh in two coffins for traditional burial rites. Follow @TrendingEx for dailies..
4,596
4,363
14,135
4,947,253
Covkid 🇮🇱 retweeted
This is much worse than we thought. It’s not just that terrorists are arriving on boats. It’s that even when we know exactly who they are and the danger they pose, we’re giving them refuge. We have been truly captured. He’s an Isis terrorist who guarded beheadings and arrived on a boat illegally. And our government won’t send him back to Iraq as he may be mistreated because of his terrorist past. WTF, I expect him to be punished, severely ! Not cuddled and taken care of by my government. dailymail.com/news/article-1…
308
3,331
13,058
319,707
Covkid 🇮🇱 retweeted
ANDY BURNHAM'S REVIEW DECLARED THERE WAS NO COVER-UP OF CHILDREN BEING GANG RAPED IN OLDHAM. THE POLICE FORCE HE WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR NEVER GAVE HIS REVIEWERS FULL ACCESS TO ITS RECORDS. HE CALLED THEIR WORK THOROUGH. Within 32 days Labour had used it to shut down the scandal. Burnham stood by it for two and a half years. BURNHAM'S REVIEW CLEARED OLDHAM WITHOUT THE EVIDENCE IT NEEDED In November 2019 the Labour leader of Oldham Council asked Andy Burnham, then Mayor of Greater Manchester and the region’s Police and Crime Commissioner, for a review into the rape gang scandal in the town. Burnham commissioned it. It took 31 months and was published on 20 June 2022. Burnham’s own review held the evidence of a cover-up and explained it away. It found that the police told the BBC there were just two pieces of intelligence on the shisha bars, when their own officers had filed several. That was a lie told to a journalist to kill a story about children being raped, and the review called it proportionate. It found the council had put the girls most at risk under one roof, where the men could find them. When a care worker reported men circling the home waiting for those girls, the review sided with the council and dismissed the worker without ever interviewing them. Greater Manchester Police, the force Burnham was responsible for, never gave his reviewers full access to its underlying records, and Oldham Council redacted key information. The cases of the ten children it examined were locked away in confidential appendices. Then Burnham's so called expert team declared there was no evidence of a senior-level cover-up. LABOUR USED BURNHAM'S REVIEW TO SHUT DOWN THE SCANDAL IN 32 DAYS Labour politicians seized on its conclusions the day it was published. Jim McMahon, MP for Oldham West and Royton, Debbie Abrahams, MP for Oldham East and Saddleworth, and Angela Rayner, the party's deputy leader, dismissed the allegations as conspiracy theories and declared that a line had been drawn under the scandal. On 30 June, ten days after publication, McMahon attacked me by name in Parliament. On 13 July, the opposition brought a motion to Oldham Council demanding an independent public inquiry, with its terms set independently of Greater Manchester and Oldham Council. Its title called for an inquiry "including the actions and knowledge of Council Members and Officers." The motion said the council could not move forward until the unanswered questions were addressed. Oldham's Labour council leader Amanda Chadderton moved an amendment that cut all of it. The demand for an independent inquiry went, and so did any scrutiny of council members and officers. In their place she wrote "We must move forward." The council adopted her amended motion by 32 votes to 20. The review had been public for 23 days, and Oldham Labour had already used it to strike out any investigation of themselves. The council offered Operation Sherwood, survivor support and oversight groups instead. On 22 July, Burnham wrote an open letter to the people of Oldham. He told them he was very grateful to his reviewers for the thorough way in which they had undertaken their work. His reviewers had written in their own report that they could not examine the police source records, and that this limited their conclusions and the assurance they could give him. Burnham's letter said nothing about it. He made no admission that they had no power to compel witnesses, and he gave no explanation of why the children's cases were locked in confidential appendices. He presented Operation Sherwood as the way forward. BURNHAM STOOD BY IT UNTIL HE HAD NO CHOICE For another two and a half years, Burnham maintained his position. Only in January 2025, under extraordinary public pressure, did he acknowledge the need for an inquiry with powers to compel evidence. Even then, he proposed a limited national inquiry drawing on the same assurance reviews. The national statutory inquiry was finally conceded in June 2025, almost three years after his Oldham report. Had Burnham and the Labour politicians who used that report to close down the scandal succeeded, the National Inquiry would not exist. My position is clear. Andy Burnham, the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, is neck deep in the cover up of the Pakistani Rape Gangs. THE PRIME MINISTER MUST BE DRAGGED BEFORE THE NATIONAL INQUIRY Andy Burnham leads the government responsible for the National Inquiry. His review was used to hold it off for almost three years. The National Inquiry must call him to give evidence under oath. He must explain why he called a review thorough when his own police force had kept its records from it, why he said nothing while Oldham Labour used it to vote down an inquiry into its own members and officers, and why he defended it for two and a half years while his Labour colleagues used it to attack the people exposing what was done to these children. The girls raped in Oldham's shisha bars and children's homes were told in 2022 that nobody had covered anything up. The man who told them went on to become Prime Minister. He must answer to them under oath. So must every other Labour Party politician involved in Oldham. Raja Miah MBE _________ You know what we are up against. The mainstream media will not touch my work. Institutions I investigate do not volunteer their records. Politicians do not suddenly decide to hold themselves to account. And yet, despite all of that, we forced the national inquiry. We did that because enough ordinary people refused to go away. But getting the inquiry was never the end of this campaign. In many ways it was only the beginning. Now we have to watch where it goes, what it investigates, which places it avoids, which witnesses it calls, which records it obtains and whether the same institutions that failed these children are allowed to control the story again. Nobody else is going to do that work for us. And I cannot do it indefinitely working on my own. That is why I keep talking about 50,000 committed subscribers. It is not a vanity number. I did not pluck it out of the air. With fifty thousand people with me means when we uncover something important, it does not depend on a newspaper editor, a television producer or an algorithm deciding whether you are allowed to see it. It gives us reach they cannot easily shut down. But there is another reason. I need to build a proper backroom operation around this work. At the moment I am investigating, researching, writing, publishing, producing the videos, running the newsletter, dealing with the technology and then starting again. It is unsustainable. I need people behind me who can take care of the technical and production work so that I can spend my time doing the thing I do best. That is why we have been pushing so hard for new paid subscribers. 🔴 SIGN UP HERE 👉 redwallandtherabble.co.uk If you read my work and want it to continue, I need your help. Sign up for free. There are no paywalls to access any of my work. If you can afford the £3 a month or £30 for the year, please become a paid subscriber. We forced the inquiry. Now we need the numbers to make sure they cannot control what happens next. Unfortunately, we are reaching the end of the road where I can continue working this way. The paid subscriptions have stalled. Worse, tens of thousands of people are now reading these articles without even joining the free mailing list. The audience is growing, but the number of people actually standing behind the work is not growing with it. This is becoming impossible to sustain. Raja Miah MBE
51
1,376
3,056
41,056
Covkid 🇮🇱 retweeted
228
3,260
14,454
124,236
Covkid 🇮🇱 retweeted
If I never saw a sodding Palestine flag for the rest of my life, it would be too soon!
312
588
12,899
116,479
Covkid 🇮🇱 retweeted
-He CUT OFF the head of a British man. -He is part of Al Qaeda. -He is currently walking FREELY around England. 🚨We are witnessing the fall of England in REAL TIME🚨
813
18,578
69,399
607,745
Covkid 🇮🇱 retweeted
Every single sentence in your post is untrue. Labour’s 2002 ‘deal’ had very little long-term impact on migrants trying to sneak into the UK by lorry/container/vehicles. It simply moved from Sangette to other routes. Between 2014-2019 55,000 came in that way — an underestimate since many came in undetected and disappeared into society. Unlike boat people, nearly all of whom are counted. So it’s an obvious nonsense to say people weren’t being sent back because nobody was arriving. Tens of thousands were arriving. They switched to small boats when major advances in technology, perimeter defence of lorry/container parks and detection made lorries etc too risky to take. That’s why, from 2018 onwards, the small boat numbers grew fast. Nothing to do with EU, Brexit, Dublin rules, fairy dust etc. Why do you peddle such falsehoods?
2002 deal Labour struck with 🇫🇷 helped tackle lorry migrants. But small boats rocketed post-Brexit: 299ppl 2018 to 45,774 in 2022. When in EU, Dublin Rg was a deterrent as ppl arriving illegally wld be returned, so v.few came. We didn't send them back because they weren't here
335
2,082
7,635
106,595
🚨 THIS IS JUDGE SIMON MEDLAND KC This judge let three men walk free from his court after they lured a 15 year old girl into a van orally raped her and live streamed her sick abuse. Another judge exposed! how any judge can let a rapist walk free is beyond me! what kind of a message is this sending? this isn't justice for the victim!! it's yet again sex offenders protected in our courts. Meanwhile people are being jailed for hurty words on social media Predator awareness ( credit)
568
2,917
5,666
43,995
Covkid 🇮🇱 retweeted
France. A father defends his shop. His only source of income to feed his wife and children. They mock him. They beat him. They destroy everything. These are not criminals, they are terrorists. Europe is dying.
5,890
33,848
141,602
4,869,375
Covkid 🇮🇱 retweeted
Watch as a Afghan invader threatens and swears at police and they do nothing. If this was a white man, he'd be tasered and arrested instantly. Two-tier cowardly policing.
1,324
11,254
51,294
395,979
Covkid 🇮🇱 retweeted
Replying to @SophieP25397
Deflection tactics by the establishment…… Don’t look here👇🏼 look over there……..
2
2
6
40
Covkid 🇮🇱 retweeted
Female business owner, black eye and destroyed business following the green/islamic unholy alliance riots in France. Where are the so called "feminists" now?
1,271
16,869
80,489
692,131
Covkid 🇮🇱 retweeted
If we don’t wake up, the carnage in France is our future. We need to return to law, order, and borders.
2,682
4,451
38,096
638,348
Covkid 🇮🇱 retweeted
The #ITV documentary into Reform found four councillors with abhorrent views - but no criminal offences. So far this weekend - a suspended Labour MP has been charged with sex offences, and a councillor has been charged over child sex offences. Maybe if they spent a year undercover with Labour they might have found more useful things?
147
977
4,258
40,055
Covkid 🇮🇱 retweeted
In other words — and contrary to all the lies told about the Dublin rules, including by Stephen Kinnock on Question Time — we took more people in under them than we sent back. End of.
71
1,018
3,145
49,320
Covkid 🇮🇱 retweeted
Meet pharmacists Jignesh Patel and Rahil Patel. They made over £1m by faking 1,636 prescriptions for NHS cancer medications - and then selling the drugs to the EU. They've each been jailed for six years, closing taxpayers more than £600k.
38
537
1,445
9,070
Covkid 🇮🇱 retweeted
Replying to @AyoubKhanMP
Same shit - different day... Can 3rd world islamic jihaddis ever live a civilised life? The Middle east caliphates are for them...lets get deporting
1
1
3
274
Covkid 🇮🇱 retweeted
Daughter walking in Bournemouth town centre just now , about 6 foreign men surrounded her and said can we ask you some questions about your life !! Because she said no , they followed her calling her a fucking bitch !! She is terrified and upset !! WE SHOULD NOT HAVE TO LIVE LIKE THIS !!! 😡😡😡
562
3,012
18,199
256,661
Elon Musk bought Twitter in 2022, and that's the only reason you're even aware that France is a warzone tonight. Legacy media describes it as "scuffles" and "cost of living protests". They're lying to everyone's faces. You and I are the media now.
273
9,655
32,000
170,902
Covkid 🇮🇱 retweeted
Zevenor Gordon, a sexual predator, has been jailed for 16 months for sexually assaulting 6 schoolgirls and women in London. Paul Powlesland, an environmental lawyer, is facing 2 years in prison for cleaning and removing garbage from the London river without a license. British justice system is broken.
267
3,367
10,950
168,326