Two weeks ago we used the framework we developed with @MCooperResearch for @metagov_project to assess "institutional readiness" for @aave. We see Aave as best-in-class here, so the findings were a north star for others. One thing stood out:
9
15
464
This seemed inconsequential at that time, but is brought into stark focus since the @LayerZero_Core, @KelpDAO hack. Who exactly has fiduciary duty here? - KelpDAO (as originator) - LayerZero (as infra) - ChaosLabs (as risk manager) - Aave Labs - AaveDAO Which person?

Apr 20, 2026 · 8:33 AM UTC

1
4
129
Sort replies: Relevant Recent Liked