I didn't go to college until I was 30. This gave me a chance to see it with the perspective of an adult. One lecture in Industrial Psychology, in particular, I will never forget. The professor spoke about how an effective job description focused on concretely measurable tasks, not vague instructions, or characteristics. For example, "maintain an 85% or greater average on customer feedback surveys", instead of "be cheerful and upbeat", or even "interact positively with customers". This means that goals are clear, and performance is measurable. A job is to do something, not be something. Once some of the students had wrapped their minds around this concept, the professor decided to do a class exercise. He asked the female students to come up with a job description for "husband". At first, this went fine. The girls noodled around a bit with things they wanted their husbands to be (tall, etc), but he was able to gradually steer them towards describing what they wanted in terms of actions. But then he asked the male students to define a wife in the same way. And all the girls became upset. Some of them had full-on meltdowns. Every single thing that a male student wanted, or expected, from his hypothetical future wife was sexist, oppressive, old-fashioned, misogynistic, patriarchal, etc. They were literally screaming. Some of them in tears. And I realized something pretty quickly. It wasn't the actual, concrete responsibilities of the female role that they objected to. It was the idea of there being a female role at all, with any attached responsibilities. These women didn't want to be wives. They wanted to be pets. What's a pet? Well a pet is not a wife, or a friend. A pet is a creature of instinct, which you bring into your home because you like how it naturally behaves. You get a cat because you want to behave like a cat, and do things a cat naturally does, like play with string, and purr when you pet him. If he's smart, he'll adapt to you somewhat, but he doesn't have responsibilities other than "be a cat". If you get a wife, you get a wife so she will do things for you, specific things that are the responsibilities of wife, like care for your home, bear and raise your children, cook nutritious meals so you don't have to eat processed slop, look after your emotional well-being, and so on. These girls didn't want to be held responsible for those things. As married women, they might have anticipated doing some of them, but only some of the time. Only when they felt like it. The cat chases the string if and when it wants to, not because chasing the string is its job. These young millenial women didn't realize it, but they wanted to be pets. And that's what they were in their college relationships. They hung out with guys when they wanted to, had sex with them when they wanted to, broke up with them for someone new when they wanted to. Their relationships had no element of reciprocal responsibilities. They were perfectly at home with the idea of men having responsibilities to them, but they would repay those men if they chose, and how they chose, not how the men actually wanted. And as I've said twice already, someone you have responsibilities to, but who has none to you, is a pet, or a child. Since our ancestors, in a moment of foolishness and weakness, allowed women to vote, it is no longer legal to dole out the corrective spankings a great many of them both need and read pornographic novels about. Therefore, the corrective measure, for any man who finds himself with a pet instead of a wife, is to withdraw from any husbandly duties and start actively searching for alternatives. This can either result in a correction of the behavior, or the end of a relationship that offers no value. Either is acceptable. This may strike some of you as dishonorable, but there is no honor in keeping a broken pact, or in serving those who despise you. Men must have the pride and self-worth to say "I will be honored and respected, or I will depart to a place where I can be, even if I must be alone there." Men must honor and respect themselves.

I would've negotiated with the Left in 2014, or in 2018. After the 2020 Covid Lockdowns and Antifa, BLM riots, I became much more hostile towards them, but there was still a window for Leftists to deescalate and find some compromise. At this point, I don't even want to talk to them. There's nothing to discuss. We are going to take everything, and either they can stop us, or they can't. I don't trust them. They are incapable of moderating themselves. Anything they agree to will immediately be violated. Mass deportations is the polite solution.

Funny how this is meant to be sad, but the ret paladin main dying to a DoT because the healers were too busy looking at loot is one of the dumbest lore deaths I've seen. Insane comparing this to Forsaken Kingdom.

I have realized that people whom chant like this are telling themselves, not the public. Its a small ritual to try and put themselves back into a deluded mental state.

"I have nothing to hide and I'm open to any sincere questions or concerns!" *locked comments* rietjournal.org/wp-content/u…

Cztery Jeźdźczynie Odrodzenia Cywilizacji Zachodu: Malfoid - Rodzina Luce - Wiara Frieren - Życie cnotliwe Amelia - Miłość ojczyzny

One of the many problems with Civic Nationalism is that, to be taken seriously as a movement, it must treat those who do not share the civics as essentially enemies or traitors to the nation. That's relatively easy to do for some people. Hasan Piker should not spend another second trampling the soil of my country. He unquestionably should be deported. But if America is simply an idea, how do you protect that idea perpetually? Ask yourself if you know anyone in your own family who has been ideologically captured by Wokeism. Are you going to support denaturalizing your own flesh and blood? Your own parents, siblings, or children? The problem is that enormous chunks of our own people have been indoctrinated into Progressivism to the point where they fundamentally reject the idea that Civic Nationalists claim America stands for. But that doesn't change the fact that our loved ones are still Americans. The solution here is that instead of deporting your own siblings because they've been captured by the Progressive omnicause, we should enact cultural and immigration reforms that enable a perpetual Right-wing majority and deprive the Left of its political power. Ancestral Americans naturally produce a particular culture. A very vocal minority of Americans have become Leftists, but that minority is only able to wield power through education and immigration. They do not largely reproduce on their own but instead indoctrinate future generations of Americans into becoming Progressives, all while importing vast numbers of Third World socialists from abroad to shore up the Democratic Party's voting base. If you wield state power to cut off the flow of new voters for the Left and crush their indoctrination networks in the media and academia, you can win this war without ever having to pit brother against sister, or father against son. We actually have it in our power to save our own people from the Progressive omnicause, but it requires us to recognize that there is a people to save in the first place.

Omg I cannot believe they ended the season of Witch Hat Atelier like that... I need season 2.

The defining political question of our time is whether the United States of America is a nation that exists for the benefit of her people, or an economic zone and welfare machine that exists for the benefit of everyone else.

I wish Blizzard had dropped WoW Forever in basically vanilla classic condition, but with poll booths in the banks and polled the community before making any changes.

Ah yes, World of Friendcraft, my favourite cosy simulator.

Some will see this photo and see it as evidence of assimilation - Indians celebrating their school's football win. But if this was true assimilation, you'd see one or two Indians surrounded by non-Indian friends.  Immigrants have always clustered in enclaves with their fellow co-ethnics, but public institutions - especially elite public institutions like universities - existed to break that loyalty and to Americanize them, to - in effect - make them auxiliary whites. And that was the path of previous generations of immigrants.  But the problem with MASS IMMIGRATION is that these ethnic enclaves that are able to re-create themselves in suburban developments, in the workplace, in universities, etc. so that they can enjoy all the material comforts of American life while still seeing themselves as part of a ethnic clan rather than as Americans.  Immigration works in small numbers when newcomers can be overwhelmed and absorbed into the native culture. Mass immigration has broken the assimilation model.

John Warcraft

It’s so funny how Warcraft Forever should’ve been dominated by hype and excitement at the potential but they immediately played their hand and revealed a race that’s nearly indistinguishable from the worst parts of retail rather than staying grounded within Classic.

Who right wing people think should get the death penalty - pedophiles -murderers -rapists Who left wing people think should get the death penalty -babies in the womb -terminally ill people -conservatives

If you have to deceptively edit what he said, you aren't the good guy in the exchange.

Jesus defeated death so you can live.

You can tell a lot about a person by how they react when someone dies.

I don't like tattoos so I would never do this, but imagine going to several different tattoo artists and asking each to make the next move in a tic-tac-toe game, stylizing their X or O how they want, maybe initial in the corner of their block...

I predict that in due course it will be "discovered" that various Muslim groups have stockpiled weapons in Britain - then shortly after it will come out that the British state knew about this but didn't want to raise ethnic tensions