Civilization; geopolitics; post-materialism; contemplative traditions; haiku. Kaleidoscopically shifting perspectives. (Bad manners blocked; no DMs)

Mexico
Based in Mexico
Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Minimum likes
Replying to @_monica_as
Time is the only thing we have, yet we can never possess it.
3
James Burnham – The Trotskyist Who Saw How It Would End. He was a Trotskyist first. In the 1930s he was one of the leading Marxist intellectuals in America – building the movement, debating Trotsky himself by letter, believing in the revolution. But he was also an American. A practical mind, trained to look at what actually happens rather than what the theory promises. So he understood what it was really about – and explained to us how it would work out. 1. In 1940 he broke with Trotsky over one question: what was the Soviet Union? Trotsky said a workers’ state, temporarily deformed. Burnham looked at it and saw something else: a new ruling class. The workers owned nothing. The capitalists were gone. Someone else was in charge – the people who ran the machine. Trotsky spent much of his last year writing against him. Burnham was right. 2. In 1941 he generalized it in The Managerial Revolution. The future would belong neither to the capitalists nor to the workers, but to the managers – the administrators, technicians and bureaucrats who control things without owning them. Capitalism would fall, he wrote – but not to the working class. To the managers. The capitalist, who risks his own fortune, would be replaced by the manager, who risks nothing, owns nothing and runs everything. That is the whole difference. The capitalist pays for his own mistakes. The manager’s mistakes are always paid by someone else – the shareholder, the taxpayer, the citizen. Burnham saw the same class rising in Soviet Russia, Nazi Germany and New Deal America. Different flags, the same new masters. And he said what it meant: the end of capitalism and of freedom – even if the façade stayed standing. 3. Orwell read it, argued with it – and borrowed from it. The three superstates of 1984 come from Burnham. So does its ruling class, which owns everything collectively and nothing personally. 4. In 1943 came The Machiavellians. Burnham studied the realists – Machiavelli and his modern heirs, like Pareto – and drew the lesson idealists never want to hear: every society is run by an elite. The only question is whether there is more than one. Freedom does not come from the absence of elites. It comes from their competition – rival powers that check each other, a free press, an opposition that can actually win. A single elite with no rival is tyranny, whatever it calls itself. 5. Now look at what the long march actually produced. Not the rule of the workers. The rule of the managers – the administrators of the ministries, the regulators in Brussels, the HR departments, the editorial boards. The façade of capitalism still stands – but who actually rules? Corporate boards spending other people’s money on other people’s ideologies. Officials in Brussels. Directors of foundations and NGOs. No voter elected them. The revolution succeeded. Only the managers won it. Gramsci designed the march. Burnham told us who would be waiting at the end of it. A class that owns nothing, answers to no voter, pays for none of its mistakes, and runs almost everything. 6. In 1964 he wrote Suicide of the West. Its verdict: liberalism – the modern progressive kind, not the classical one – is "the ideology of Western suicide." It lets a civilization accept its own retreat and feel good about it. Every loss becomes a sign of progress. Sixty years later, it reads like a description of Brussels. 7. The ex-Trotskyist ended up a founding editor of National Review, and in 1983 Ronald Reagan gave him the Presidential Medal of Freedom. From Trotsky’s comrade to Reagan’s medal. He knew the left from the inside, and he had the American instinct to ask the only question that matters: not what the theory promises, but who ends up in charge. In 1941 his answer was the managers. It still is – unless a rival elite rises. For the first time in decades, one has: builders, not administrators. Burnham would have recognized the moment. Not a revolution – a rotation.
Antonio Gramsci – The Most Dangerous Intellectual of the Twentieth Century. Not the most famous. Not the most read. The most dangerous and the most consequential – because he was the one who figured out why the revolution kept failing, and what to do instead. The man who invented the long march through the institutions. Everything that followed — the Frankfurt School, the Fabian Society’s operational model, the WEF formation pipeline, the captured university, the HR department enforcing approved speech — is downstream of what he wrote in a prison cell in Mussolini’s Italy, in code, between 1929 and 1935. 1. His central question: why hasn’t it happened? The working class was supposed to rise. The contradictions of capitalism were supposed to produce the revolution. They hadn’t – not in the West. Gramsci’s answer was precise and devastating: because the ruling class does not maintain power through force alone. It maintains power through cultural hegemony – the control of the ideas, values, and frameworks through which people understand the world. The worker who accepts that the existing order is simply how things are will not revolt, regardless of his material conditions. The revolution requires cultural change first. 2. The instrument was the long march through the institutions. Not the barricade. The school, the university, the media, the judiciary, the civil service, the cultural establishment – every institution through which a civilization transmits its values to the next generation. Capture these, fill them with people who share the counter-hegemonic project, and the cultural assumptions that maintain the existing order gradually dissolve. No barricades. No visible moment of rupture. Just the slow replacement of one cultural hegemony with another. 3. The educational capture was the masterpiece. Control the curriculum and you control the categories of thought available to the next generation. Not by telling them what to conclude – by shaping what questions they think to ask, what they consider obvious and what they consider unthinkable. The generation educated after the long march does not need to be told what to think. It thinks what it was formed to think – and experiences that thinking as its own. 4. He also theorized the organic intellectual – the person who translates the theoretical framework into stories and assumptions that circulate through the culture without appearing ideological. The film that makes the existing order seem absurd. The journalist who frames every story within the approved assumptions. Gramsci understood that culture is politics by other means – and that the side that controls the culture wins, regardless of who wins the elections. 5. This is not a conspiracy theory. It is a published, documented, widely taught strategy that the left implemented consciously across the entire Western world. The 1968 generation put it into practice in the universities. They became the professors, the journalists, the civil servants, the judges, the HR directors of the decades that followed. The march took fifty years. It worked. 6. Mussolini’s prosecutor said at his trial: "We must stop this brain from functioning for twenty years." The brain did not stop. It produced thirty-three notebooks – smuggled out, published, and became the most widely read Marxist text in the Western academy after Marx himself. Gramsci died in 1937, six days after his release, at forty-six. He did not see the march he theorized. He did not need to. 7. Every captured institution, every transformed curriculum, every HR department enforcing approved speech, every content moderation policy suppressing the unauthorized voice – all running the program Antonio Gramsci designed in a prison cell, by a brain that was supposed to have been stopped. It wasn’t. And neither was the march. Until now – because the distribution monopoly that made its outcomes enforceable is cracking. The counter-march has begun. It just doesn’t have a name yet.
43
518
1,376
33,589
Replying to @Glenn_Diesen
Re Merz: not 'his' but his masters' policies.
8
American an European friends, I’m so ashamed, but you need to see what France has become. Don’t make the same mistakes we did. The only peaceful solution is to send them back to their countries of origin they love so much. We cannot coexist. It will be them, or us.
5,208
30,889
104,745
3,636,160
Interesting developments. Gold and silver becoming transactional money again in many US States. If this takes, the US truly will start to become 'Great Again'.
1
1
23
Replying to @JimBeattie18
in fields of flowers we wander free the trees, the skies, the clouds and me...
2
6
203
Replying to @Glenn_Diesen
Three main solutions to the Yuge Debt Crisis: 1. Default / Reset 2. Keep borrowing more & more 3. Grow out of it by reshoring manufacturing 3 is the best choice; maybe not doable, but definitely the ideal best way forward.
3
3
130
Replying to @ImBreckWorsham
Israel is controlled by the same Money Power that controls the US. So Trump is not 'handing America over to Israel'. He is just revealing the kleptocracy driving it all.
1
69
There is no coming back from the creation of the Fed in 1913; nor from the LIHOP Pearl Harbour; nor creation of Israel; nor JFK's public execution; nor bombing Yugoslavia, wrecking Libya & Syria, nor 9/11, nor feminism. There is no coming back; the West is done already.
1
2
81
Replying to @ImBreckWorsham
If the US ends up not rebuilding those bases and getting out of the Middle East, that will prove a Yuge Win for the American people!
5
38
Replying to @cenkuygur
Acc. to Professor Xiang, Jared was a member of the Harvard Chabad group along with Natalie Portman and Mark Zuckerberg. Chabad Lubavitcher leaders frequently meet with Trump, Zelinsky, Putin, Bibi and more. For whatever reason they are part of the Western leadership matrix.
7
26
1,081
Replying to @Glenn_Diesen
Up to now Putin has done an admiral job overseeing military campaigns which exercise restraint; however it is not clear that war is something best waged with restraint. His adversaries hope to goad him into escalation; and in many ways he has no choice but to fulfill their wish.
2
241
Replying to @perennialmystic
like any woman yon tender rose feels when she is seen, blooms when she is loved birthing fragrant blessings of sweet pink grace
1
2
39
Replying to @perennialmystic
My morning liturgy: "thoughts which are mind made of mind are like waves which are ocean made of ocean; through the portal of any such particular we plunge into the primordial silence of ever-present wakefulness from which we are, and always have been, continuously inseparable."
1
3
417
Quite an opening paragraph:
1
2
2
30
Replying to @RyanRozbiani
Yeah but: Bibi is just another puppet too. Think deeper!
3
1
3
1,006