Used to post about how government works, but it's a dumpster fire cess pit of awfulness. Get Mad. Stay Mad. Act accordingly to Righteous Justice.

Victoria, Australia
Probably the most accurate representation of the difference between Left and Right Wing politics and political beliefs for this day and age.
Dang…. This is so TRUE!!!
5
11
87
5,198
Australia, Explained retweeted
Family businesses have been forced to shut their doors due to the NSW Government’s firearms reforms. Some of the affected people told their heartbreaking stories at NSW Parliament
6
34
64
1,506
Tell me your State is broke, spent all your tax money and is desperately trying ANYTHING to get more money (except reduce government spending), without telling me.....
The ATO conducted more than 25 surprise visits to CBD fast food outlets, restaurants and cafes this week as part of a major new blitz. Full story: bit.ly/4AJLD8K
1
3
18
932
Today I did the weekly grocery shop, and I splurged. I bought the $8 fancy bottle of passata sauce, and the organic tomato paste. I also get the extra aged cheddar for $3 more, and the gourmet truss on the vine tomatoes. I bought a whopping whole kilo of mince to boot, and the brown mushrooms, not those cheap ass white button ones. My spag Bol this week is fancy AF. Someone should report me.
See it? The neighbour got a new car? Taking friends out for a lavish birthday dinner? Report it....... 📸 Elvi_770
3
17
1,527
I need at @ all that just is all my TERF friends on here. @salltweets @TERF_Times @Juanita30622990 @vigee_elisabeth @BillboardChris @KirralieS
New level of misogyny unlocked 🤯
1
442
Socrates was worrying about this more than 2,000 years ago. His criticism of democracy wasn’t simply “stupid people shouldn’t vote.” (although sometimes, I tell ya, I gotta wonder).... His view was that we treat political judgment as though it is the one important human activity requiring no knowledge, effort or expertise whatsoever. Now, we expect doctors to understand medicine, pilots to understand aviation and builders to understand construction. Yet someone who spends years following politics, reading legislation, examining competing arguments and understanding the consequences of government policy gets EXACTLY the same vote as someone who has paid absolutely no attention, has no idea what the parties stand for, and chooses on the basis of a slogan, the looks of the candidate, or an advertisement something they heard that morning (or more often than not - easy promises for "free stuff", also known as Pork Barreling). Socrates’ great fear was what follows from that: demagoguery. Politics becomes less about persuading an informed electorate and more about discovering which messages, fears, promises and slogans can move the greatest number of people. (Does this sound familiar yet?) Governments and political parties haven't somehow evolved beyond this problem. Modern polling, focus groups, targeted advertising, social media campaigns and carefully tested slogans have made political persuasion vastly more sophisticated. (Remember Dan Andrews "nudge" unit? - your tax payers hard at work looking to understand how to psychologically "move" you to "the Left". So, Monica's point about compulsory voting is interesting. Making voting voluntary wouldn't magically make politicians honest. It wouldn't eliminate propaganda, manipulation, tribalism or demagogues. Politicians would still try to persuade people using exactly the same techniques. But what does change is who MUST participate. Australia deliberately brings almost the entire electorate into the process: turnout has remained above 90% at federal elections since compulsory voting was introduced, and it was about 90% again in 2025. Under voluntary voting, someone who doesn't know, doesn't care and doesn't want to make a political choice can simply stay disconnected. They don't have to vote. They don't have to turn up and sign their name off. They don't have to pay any attention at all. That doesn't mean everyone who abstains is ignorant, or everyone who turns up is informed - uniformed voters will stay turn up and vote on pork Barreling promises or pretty faces. But it does remove the legal requirement for the politically disengaged, and there are plenty of them that would choose to not turn up at all. I think the deeper, enduring problem with or without compulsory voting to all of this is; the political system rewards campaigns/parties for learning how to activate people who aren't engaged rather than giving people compelling reasons to become engaged. Perhaps Socrates' question remains the better one: If political judgment matters so enormously, why do we design democracy around maximising the number of people who cast a ballot rather than maximising the number who understand the decision they're making? Why isn't [neutral] Politics a HUGE educational topic from Kinder to University? It affects so much of our lives, yet the only thing the kids are learning in school these days is "How to take the day off to protest the red haired lady who said something we don't like". I'm work Monica - ending compulsory voting is a step in the right direction 👍
Mandatory voting is anti free speech! Abstaining from speaking should be our right in a country that apparently has freedom of speech. Higher voter turnouts doesn’t equal a better democracy, it forces politically-uneducated people to cast uniformed votes!
2
9
1,360
I'm curious what other people's honest journey in politics has been. I just replied this 👇 to someone else's post, but thought I'd make it a tweet of my own, and ask the question - in contrast to my journey, what has yours been like? ☕ Before becoming politically engaged, my young adult understanding of Left vs Right was; The left spend our money, and the right force us to save it. - In my very younger days it was; 👉Labor gives us stuff for the taxes we pay. 👉Liberal just want to tax us more. In my late twenties and early 30s it was; 🌈 Labor is the Be Kind Movement that just wants us all to get along and what does it matter if a little of your tax dollars goes towards helping the less fortunate - it's makes for a niceer community...and what's wrong with using someone's preferred pronouns, it doesn't hurt anyone 🤷 😡Liberal - Misogynistic, out of touch, elites, awful. Mid 40s after Melbourne Lockdowns, Government response to COVID, and a baptism of fire to how politics really works; 🤔Liberal - ok so that Gillard misogynistic speech was bull crap, omg I didn't realise how much of the community Tony Abbott really served as a genuine person, even if I don't relate to him, yea Liberals want to save our money because actually being "in the Black" is a really good thing for our country, but why the hell do they seem to be ignoring their voters base on a whole bunch of important issues, and why don't the seem to be "in actual opposition" to many Labor policies - they are supposed to be? 💣 ⚠️ Labor - OMFG 🫨🫨🫨 What level of insanity is this party?? Do they even believe in Democracy and Western Freedoms? These people are amongst the most vile, atrocious, arrogant SOBs I've ever had the displeasure of dealing with in my entire life.
4
444
In all the MSM reporting in this issue, not once have they called out the offenders for who they are; African men, either "first generation Australians" (and therefore have zero excuses for their so called "past trauma"), or Migrant refugees who clearly aren't for for Australian society. When is the conversation going be had about the REFUSAL TO ASSIMILATE by the African youth community? Why are we putting up with third world violence in our quickly declining first world country?
Look at this. 4 seperate woman were targeted by a group of over 20 African gang members. @DrewPavlou #auspol #springst
1
9
40
1,967
Lol come on Australia, how much fun could we have with this? See your local Labor politician out for Lobster? Report them. Anika walking into CBR in a fancy new suit? Report her. Albo's minders buying a coffee for $7.50? Report them.
See it? The neighbour got a new car? Taking friends out for a lavish birthday dinner? Report it....... 📸 Elvi_770
3
1
25
7,688
Alleged sanity post about how we One Nation supporters are just a bunch of hateful morons, so I felt compelled to reply. I was standing in a supermarket queue recently when a middle-aged woman put half her groceries back. Nothing extravagant. Meat. Fruit. A few things for the kids. “I’ll get them next week,” she said. Then she tapped her card and waited to see if it declined. And that tells you something about Australia’s supposed “mad rush to the right” that apparently hasn’t occurred to Paul Williams. Maybe people didn’t suddenly lose their empathy. Maybe they ran out of it. For years Australians have been told to care about everybody and everything except the consequences of government policy on their own lives. Care about the international student. Care about population growth. Care about every new identity group. Care about the latest symbolic political cause. Care about changing the language you use. Care about achieving ideological targets. But struggling to pay your mortgage? Can’t find a rental? Watching your electricity bill climb? Can’t get your kid into a doctor? Sitting in traffic while infrastructure fails to keep pace with population growth? Worried that your children may never afford a home? Apparently asking whether government policy contributed to any of that makes you selfish. That's not empathy. It’s a demand for empathy to flow in one direction only. And Australians are exhausted. Cost of living is currently the number-one issue Australians nominate, followed by housing. Immigration has also returned to the top five. Even the ABC's analysis of One Nation voters found cost of living is a major concern, while immigration distinguishes them more strongly from other voting groups. So perhaps instead of diagnosing millions of Australians as stupid, poorly educated, hateful and lacking the emotional development of a five-year-old, it might be worth asking why they are angry. Maybe people moving away from the political left aren't saying: “I don't care about other people.” Maybe they're saying: “For decades, when the consequences landed on me, you didn't care either.” You don't get to spend years dismissing people's concerns about housing, migration, energy, crime, cost of living and social cohesion — then suddenly rediscover “empathy” when those same people start voting against you. And this isn't some tiny fringe that can simply be sneered away. Recent polling has shown extraordinary disruption to Australia's traditional party system, with One Nation recording support comparable with or above the major parties in some polls. Even the ABC has interviewed migrants now considering One Nation because they believe the major parties have failed on housing, infrastructure, migration and cost-of-living pressures. Perhaps that's the story worth investigating. Not: “Why have Australians become horrible?” But: “What happened that made so many Australians conclude the political establishment stopped listening to them?” People aren't obligated to keep voting for a system they believe is failing them just to demonstrate that they're compassionate. And for many Australians, One Nation's rise represents something the political establishment hasn't given them for a very long time: Hope that the two-party duopoly can actually be disrupted. You can call those voters selfish. You can call them ignorant. You can tell them they're on the “wrong side of history”. Or you could finally listen to them. Because perhaps Australians haven't lost their empathy at all. Perhaps they've simply stopped accepting the proposition that caring about everyone else requires continually sacrificing themselves. -Not a professor at a Uni, just a girl hungry for political change, and a Government to take their boot off our necks.
Sanity in Murdoch publications is rare so should be shared 👇🏽 Opinion: Preposterous political ploy selfish Australians are falling for I was standing in a shop queue recently when a middle-aged bloke – clearly angry at life and wanting the world to know it – picked up a collection tin for women’s cancer research. “Why is it always about women?” he groaned. “Why don’t they have anything for men?” And that tells you everything you need to know about Australia’s mad rush to the loony right of politics. First, it shows a wilful ignorance of reality. Cancer research affecting males (exclusively or primarily) actually receives more funding than that affecting females. Second, it suggests a lack of both logic and empathy. Too many people cannot see – sometimes literally – beyond their own noses. Even a child knows proof of non-existence is not found in an object’s absence. Indeed, a lack of empathy is often a function of a poor education. Either way, too many Australians lack the basic empathy to see another point of view. Are striking workers greedy, or might they have a legitimate complaint about pay and conditions? The Swiss theorist Jean Piaget – pounded into every teaching student – found that well-rounded humans should be empathetic by age five. But I guess Piaget didn’t spend a lot of time in Australia, where debate rails between kicking out foreign students (despite their $55bn annual boost to the local economy) and dumping protections for LGBTQIA+ people whose rights in no way subtract from yours. Think about it. Does a beer manufacturer supporting trans people’s rights make your day harder? And would your daily life really be worse if a First Nations Voice to Parliament offered advice, on Indigenous matters only, that politicians could so easily reject? What is it about our inability to see ourselves in the shoes of another person – someone even more vulnerable than us who, in all likelihood, is also the battling the cost of living? As hard as life is for you, there are countless for whom it’s much harder. Every day there are Australians – law-abiding taxpayers who love their kids and their pets and who keep their head down – who are forced to battle racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia and cruel stereotypes around disability, autism and mental illness. And it’s through this preposterous hatred of others that populist politicians hoodwink angry Australians – just for votes and the election-funding dollars that come with them. And we’re falling for it. So you’re not alone if you’ve noticed people just don’t care any more. Studies have found human empathy across Western civilisation has almost halved in recent decades, fuelled initially by the individualistic, dog-eat-dog free market of the 1980s, and accelerated by social media networks that position us literally at the centre of our own digital world. Who cares about the international student – paying dearly to study at an Australian university in order to build a better life back home – as long as we can post pictures of our holiday. Be honest, when was the last time you dropped cash into a charity tin or tips jar? I’ve been thinking about blinkered views since the recent student protests against One Nation. Public comment was appalling in its opposition not just to what young people were saying, but in students’ right to say it. We have the right to respectfully express counter-opinions indicating where protesters are wrong on logic, but we can’t demand others be stripped of a right to lawful protest. I guarantee public opinion would be very different if young One Nation members marched in support of Australia Day or the flag. While there are legitimate questions around school students being off-campus during school hours, Article 15 of the UN’s Convention on the Rights of the Child protect the right of under-18s to protest lawfully. And shouting slogans is lawful when not inciting violence. To deny this is to deny a long history of young people changing the world for the better. I’m old enough to remember grey-haired politicians warning that university students were dangerous communists for opposing a Vietnam War they said was vital to Australia’s security. Look how that turned out. Young people have led anti-apartheid demonstrations in South Africa despite the risk of injury and death and, more recently, have been at the forefront of climate change and same-sex-marriage movements. In short, young people – so easily painted as know-nothing bludgers with no life experience – have always been on the right side of history. So take off your blinkers and pop on your empathy specs, and see what side of history you want to be on. - Paul Williams is an associate professor at Griffith University
28
68
334
13,848
Australia, Explained retweeted
“Where are your preferences going?” Every election, Labor and the Liberals dust off the same scare campaign about preferences. They want voters to believe political parties secretly control where votes end up. It’s a lie. Your preferences go exactly where you put them. Every number on your ballot paper is your instruction. No party deal can override the choices you've made. Don't fall for the scare campaign. Here's a special education on how preferences really work and where your vote actually goes.
219
1,190
4,840
134,860
Western Region One Nation Launch Event for Melton Candidate Matt Katselis ! 💪🧡
17
605
Australia, Explained retweeted
Brilliant from Maryt Jane Murphy: "You know who is not a female? A male person who says, "But I bought a wig, learned some vocabulary, and I joined the group chat.""
1
7
41
840
Australia, Explained retweeted
Do you reckon Scott Morrison has been to a petrol station lately? Petrol prices are surging on his watch.
1,729
2,000
7,690
Always a good way to end your day and a X scroll with Libertarians trending right up there! :) I can't wait for Australia to have its own Javier Milei moment. Until then, watch Topher's marble video, decide who you want to give your $7 to, and then put who you want to Govern at number 2. You'll get it, if you watch his latest Marbles video.
1
2
464
The VERY people signing a petition to have Professor Joanna Howe fired from Adelaide University (due to her extra-curricular activities in Pro Life advocacy), are EXACTLY the same ones demanding a University allow them to form and run (on campus!!) a Jew Hating, call to War campaign, 'Globalise the Intifada'. You people are broken beyond salvation.
The Bondi Massacre last December in which 15 innocent people lost their lives is exactly what ‘Globalise the Intifada’ means for Australia.
2
7
35
1,749
Wow 😲😲😲😲 Read what really happened. Then read the news article. Unbelievable!!
I received this message about this headline: (shared with permission) “Hi Sall, in case you find the below of interest; What little media reported it, wrongly attributed it to ‘all female’ however it was instigated by a TiM in the Women’s change room last week who was confronted by a pregnant woman. Man then pushed pregnant woman to the ground. Two female staff members were then assaulted by the man, with at least one punched. Rather than address the misogyny at hand, council scrap the entire Women only swimming sessions.”
1
2
24
1,038
Finally someone in MSM saying the thing their not supposed to say. And for the rest of you who know what another hike rate to your already expensive mortgage, petrol, and food costs - this is not your fault. Hang in there, the Orange Wave is coming 🧡 🌊🌊
3
19
95
3,188
If there are school guidelines then they are guidelines that can changed by Government. @OneNationVic - I don't see anything in the education policy about the removal of trans gender education or the reinstalling of safeguarding for sex-based protections of boys and girls in school. Can you please release your policy on this position asap?
A mother has lodged a formal complaint after a transgender Year 8 student was placed in a girls’ cabin during a school camp, with the school maintaining it followed government guidelines > bit.ly/3TNg1OJ
2
3
16
1,035
By all means, let's have the national conversation about the rise of the Far Right. Ask Pauline Hanson the difficult questions. Ask whether One Nation would ever tolerate white supremacy, Nazism or the KKK. Ask where the boundary of the Australian Right should be. Those are legitimate questions. But here's the problem: They've been asked. Repeatedly. Asked and answered repeatedly. Denounced repeatedly. Pauline Hanson has repeatedly rejected and denounced those extremist movements. When a KKK leader recently praised her, she again publicly rejected both him and the KKK. Yet Australian media travelled to America, interviewed a KKK leader, obtained a favourable comment about Hanson, and brought it home as part of yet another conversation about One Nation and the spectre of the “Far Right.” They aren't interested in the question and answer anymore, they are just interested in making One Nation out to be something they are not. That is not journalism, that is political interference of the highest order. But now, lets make them do the other direction. Where is Australia's equally serious national conversation about the Far Left? Where are the documentaries asking where mainstream left-wing politics ends and ideological extremism begins? Where are the difficult questions for Labor about which socialist ideas it embraces, which it rejects, and precisely where it draws the line? Where are the interviews with authoritarian communist governments asking which Australian left-wing policies they admire - followed by demands that Labor explain the association? Not because such an endorsement would magically make Labor communist - it wouldn't. (The actual evidence is clearly in their policies, how they treat the Australian tax-payer, women, & indoctrination of your children). We endlessly debate the hypothetical road from Right to Far Right, scrutinising a party that has never governed Australia. Meanwhile, Australia has travelled substantially further to the Left are we are left asking why the equivalent question; Where does Left become Far Left? - receives nothing like the same sustained national examination. Scrutinise the Right. Absolutely. But scrutinise the Left with the same intensity. Because if the purpose is genuinely to protect Australia from political extremism, rather than simply to demonise one side of politics; **extremism doesn't suddenly stop mattering when you turn left.**
There is something seriously wrong with a media organisation that believes Australians need to hear what the Ku Klux Klan thinks about Australian politics and chooses to promote those views. Channel Nine should be ashamed of itself.
28
64
305
19,693
Australia, Explained retweeted
- You: "My stocks went up 10%." - Government: "Congratulations! That's taxable." - You: "But inflation was 8%. I only really gained 2%." - Government: "We tax the full 10%." - You: "You tax the inflation you created?" - Government: "Capital gains are capital gains." - You: "So you profit from debasing my money twice?" - Government: "You're not an economist."
167
2,527
17,740
706,264