LL Cool J warns Joe Rogan: programmers' political biases will ruin AI. On the Political Compass test, xAI's Grok is the only major AI that lands near the center. Anthropic, Google, Meta, and OpenAI all cluster far to the left.

So do the Candace Owens bots want to explain her blatant lying here? 😂😂 After being exposed for being a lesbian fraud, she decided to log into the account and claim it’s not hers - despite her face in the videos and her full name displayed in the credits. Afterwards, she went on Theo Von and admitted it was hers. Any explanation? 👀😂

These people a so gross and disgusting 🤢🤮

Charlie once spoke at Cambridge University in a room that was totally against him. When he talked about it on his show, he said: “We need to be unafraid to go into those environments… We need to be unafraid to go into the place where we’re not always going to be applauded. We’re not always going to be celebrated. We’re not always going to be welcomed with open arms.” Vanity Fair put me on their New Establishment list and I understand why some are asking why I would sit down with them. The answer is two-fold: 1) They were going to write something whether I participated or not. I could leave their audience with a story about me told entirely by other people, or I could speak for myself. 2) Growing our movement means going places where everyone doesn’t already agree with us. That’s what our students do on campuses every day, by the way. They set up a table and talk to whoever walks up, including people who disagree with them. They don’t pack up and go home just because someone says something they don’t like or flips their table or spits on them. I ask them to have that courage every day and I should be willing to do the same thing. As conservatives, we know that legacy media outlets are often hostile to us. But it doesn’t make sense to retreat until every magazine, university, cultural institution and media platform we disagree with comes to our side. Charlie didn’t do that, neither do our students, and I won’t do it either. Will they take digs at me? Of course. They spent plenty of time on my appearance, clothes and mannerisms rather than our growth, momentum, and resilience. There are things in the piece that lack context, that were petty, and in some cases even sort of mean, but that was to be expected. But now faith, freedom, and family are sitting in the pages of Vanity Fair, and a whole lot of people who don’t follow Turning Point USA are reading about those principles. To keep taking back ground as conservatives, we need to boldly walk into the left’s “safe spaces,” sharing our values, and talking about why America is worth fighting for. If we actually want to win the culture, we can’t just surrender huge parts of it to the left and then complain that they control it. There are a lot of opinions about the list and the profiles. Mine is that we need more dialogue, not less, and a lot more conservatives willing to walk into rooms where we aren’t expected, aren’t always welcomed, and certainly aren’t guaranteed applause. My plan is to keep walking into them.

📰Tyler Robinson update: Judge Tony Graf Jr. has given Utah County prosecutors and Robinson's defense until Oct. 21 to file memos outlining roughly how long they need for trial prep, how long they anticipate jury selection to take, their estimated trial length, etc., in the assassination of Charlie Kirk. "The Court will use the memoranda to establish a schedule that accounts for the constitutional rights of Mr. Robinson and the victim representative, as applicable and defined by law, while ensuring adequate preparation by both parties and a fair and impartial trial, and avoiding unwarranted delay," Graf writes. The victim representative is Charlie's widow, Erika Kirk, who under Utah law also has a right to the speedy disposition of the charges. Robinson is due back in court on Oct. 23.

HAPPY BIRTHDAY @BrianRoemmele !!!

@grok has there ever been a call "Running Into the,Kicker" before tonight?

Why was this personal? He hardly played last year!! 🙄🤣

Warning: GRAPHIC #TyquanThornton @Chiefs Left ankle fracture dislocation (Judge the injury, not reaction. Initial celebration of reception)

How did he not feel that break?? #ChiefsKingdom

Wow, she really is the best podcaster ever!!! Possibly even better than @RealCandaceO Considering she celebrated Charlie Kirk death and now profiting off his death. What a scumbag.

Hi @grok Show how Google Trends can fake a spike. It scores the busiest moment in your dates and place as 100, not a real count. Animate 0, 0, 1, 0, and 4 searches becoming a line that hits 100. Label it an example. Apply it to Ana Escobar’s Fort Huachuca charts: image search, Tucson (Sierra Vista), short window ending September 9, 2025. That area is not the base. “Erica” is not “Erika.” A spike does not show who searched or who entered, and it is not a visitor log.

Just got back from the Ohio rally @POTUS @berniemoreno @JonHusted @VivekGRamaswamy There is no rally like a Trump rally! The energy, the enthusiasm, the patriotism, and all of the love for our country, makes it all worth it! I’m super grateful I got to go, and I took my parents to it, bc they’ve never seen Trump! Being there, and experiencing it, shows that social media isn’t real life. There’s a lot to fight for and there’s a lot to be encouraged about! My favorite moment was Trump reading the snake story and dedicating it to Springfield! 🤣🤣 Get your asses out and vote for these midterms!

Hahaha 😆 Trying to do a direct mirror of what I did... @ChewingTheVoid this is childish...Lets move on. Have a good one

Yes, but it doesn't mean you were there....

I did an analysis of Ana work and verified it with @Grok multiple times and got the same results this morning. Ana Escobar’s method is a reconstruction, not a Fort Huachuca record. She uses Google Trends image search for the Tucson (Sierra Vista) area through September 9, 2025. A score of 100 is only the peak in that window. The region is not the base, and the chart does not name the searcher. She then adds flight estimates, contract notes, and names already being discussed, and calls the result a guest list. A stream chapter says a “system vulnerability” tied it together. She has not posted the flaw, the raw output, a gate log, or a FOIA release. Trends scores a peak as 100 and cannot show who entered the base. Snow named Harpole; her list names Kolvet. The base uses its own entry system, not Google. That conflict is a sign the method is matching a narrative, not recovering one record. Snow named Brian Harpole and Erika Kirk. Ana’s list names Andrew Kolvet and Erika Kirk. A method recovering the same event would not swap the man. Using Snow’s disputed account as the reason to look, then returning a different name, is matching the narrative rather than confirming one record. This is nothing to wow about!

Haha Nice work!! 👏

Must watch clip. Save and bookmark for when Democrats complain now about the plight of migrants under Trump. There were VERY FEW segments done by the MSM during the Biden years on the atrocities happening at and around the border. In fact, this may be the only in depth segment that CNN did on it during those years. Mass death of migrants caused by Biden's "empathetic" policies. Deaths along both sides of the border, deaths in holding facilities, deaths in the river, bodies washing up, bodies being found everywhere. It was a humanitarian crisis. And yet this may be the only clip in four years CNN did on the horrors that were happening. This is a tiny glimpse into the pain and suffering that Democrat immigration policies cause. It also says nothing about the historic levels of child trafficking that Biden's policies enabled. Notice how in the rare instance CNN covered it, the clip never mentioned the Biden Administration or its policies. They never tied it back to the administration. Imagine how CNN would have covered this if it were happening under Trump. CNN literally had people waiting for algae to grow in the Reflecting pool so they could report on it. CNN hosts like Jake Tapper, Brian Stelter, and Anderson Cooper strangely didn't ever feel the need to cover these atrocities happening at the border during the Biden years. They spent two years on the Russia hoax and just spent a year on the Epstein hoax, but in four years of Biden, they apparently didn't feel the need to ask any Democrat politicians about this. They will now though be all over the next story of a migrant being made to feel uncomfortable by the Trump Administration. When you see a Democrat now pretending to care about migrants, remember that they didn't say one single word about four years of this.

Wait so that Oompa Loompa Abdul guy with the Kirkland XS v-necks and a Napoleon complex is abusive and immature? Noooooooo

What a very cool surprise @BarstoolGruden 🤣 @ohiogop