For the Candy Cult
Interesting.
The entire crime scene huh? I would be curious as to what you think that encompasses.
The area under the tent, where the University faced the issue of having to remove the bloody bio-hazard, decided to place pavers in that area because they knew visitor foot traffic would be heavy. There is nothing strange about removing 10 inches of soil to install concrete pavers. Any construction is going to remove at least 6 inches to remove the grass and the root mat. It's standard practice. That area was released by the SBI and the University had to clean it up. It was no longer a crime scene after being released back to the owner.
It's not evidence of a cover up.
The SUV was a rental. After it was released by the SBI, it was returned to the owner. I imagine the middle row of seats and carpet were removed to be processed by the SBI. The owner wasn't going to rent out a vehicle missing seats and carpet and sold it. Which is exactly what every rental company does when it gets rid of damaged cars. Most are sold at auction or from contracts to lot owners.
It's not evidence of a cover up.
The SD card was his property. He had every right to remove his property as well as securing what footage was on the card. He provided the information to the SBI.
That is the opposite of covering something up.
How do you know that things Charlie Kirk was wearing are missing? Because you don't know where they are?
Just because you don't know where they are, doesn't mean that those items weren't processed.
It's not evidence of anything.
Returning the personal affects of a victim to their family is common practice, everywhere.
The items were processed, including the phone and returned. That is not evidence of a cover up.
How do you know the RODE microphone is missing? Because you don't know where it is? That doesn't mean it's missing. It means you don't know where it is but think you deserve to know. That's just evidence of your narcissism. The same for any recording it may have captured.
You can rest assured that those individuals were questioned. If I'm not mistaken, several of them had to give up their clothing and left the hospital in Tyvek suits.
What evidence do you have that "things" were done to Charlie Kirk by them? What evidence would they destroy on their friend that was dead when he hit the ground?
I'm not sure where your opinion of the security team "letting their client die" comes from.
They reacted by packing the wound on a dead guy and threw him in the closest vehicle they had and drove to the hospital.
There wasn't anything, anyone could do. Including an EMT.
My question to you is do you think you're capable of rational thought or is everything evidence of a cover up?
And you still haven't answered the question of who killed Charlie Kirk.
Are you just waiting for Candace or some other podcaster to tell you?