🇼🇸

bejamin button down!

Too many people are way too soft.

Pretty.

There's A Reason The Media Is Silent About This...

Sapasui 🤮

Nobody will be meaner to you than an insecure man that’s attracted to you

Not a single word of this is true.

The presumption of innocence, pushing back against mob justice, waiting to render judgment until all of the facts are in, resisting groupthink, arguing in favor of critical thinking, and generally defending the pursuit of truth. Is that not enough?

Beware of post slut psychosis

Big show today! -We exclusively reveal contracts signed for Charlie’s 2025 Fall tour. -The FBI tortured an autistic man into a patsy confession. We highlight a bizarre coincidence between Brian J. Cole and Tyler Robinson as it pertains to the media. -We reveal a never before seen message from the grieving widow to her team in the weeks following the assassination. -Yes, we’re still talking about Jeffrey Epstein—and wondering if Charlie was murdered to protect a global trafficking network. Join us LIVE: youtube.com/live/q4m-kGzvwjw

Feminism can eat shit.

Get this Cornell 7 goyslop off my feed I don’t care

Let's be clear, the people who support the alleged Cornell rape victim just support her because they hate men. They resent men. They envy men. Four years ago they wanted to be men. They don't care about this rape hoax. And they don't care that rape hoaxers like this woman are going to make it more difficult for women who are actually raped to receive justice.

y’all owe men an apology.

If you pretended to be a friend of Charlie Kirk but conveniently decided not to cover the UVU independent review and what it revealed about his organization we are comfortable never hearing from you ever again. Thank you for attention to this matter!

We, as women, MUST stop slut shaming our friends

UPDATE on the Cornell incident: As reported by ABC, newly released texts between Jane Doe and Male #1 from 4 days after the incident (several weeks before police report) demonstrate that she told him "everyone needs to grow up cause sexuality and sex and s---is changing and stuff like this is going to become more common, I'm also really open minded tho, I love you king." A couple weeks later, but still before she made a police report, the young man told her that he was concerned he'd been "labeled an assaulter" and she responded "I haven't said anything but I do know people are changing the narrative because like in any sexual scenario w one woman and many men the woman was probably the victim." While these texts do not conclusively prove she was not legally raped, they substantially strengthen the supposition that Jane Doe changed her story, and possibly genuinely changed her perception of what happened, as a result of being publicly shamed for having sex with many men or whatever was happening in her relationship with Male #1. The most important point though, is that destroying people's lives based on allegations to police, in a lawsuit, or elsewhere is extremely dangerous. It is exactly why civilized societies should not engage in the modern equivalent of witch trials, and people should decline to rush to judgment. The way this story has changed over mere days is a near perfect lesson in why we shouldn't call for people's heads simply because disturbing accusations have been made. Of course, no one will actually learn anything and nothing will change, regardless of how many times this sort of thing happens, because apparently as a nation, we are incapable of actual progress. I intend not to comment on this case again absent extraordinary developments, because my primary interest is not in determining one way or the other what happened, but in urging people to resist the temptation to engage in mob justice to the point law enforcement officers are acting at the public's direction. I believe that point has been made, although of course it won't satisfy the bloodthirsty.

lmao. I can’t wait to to watch. I love petti owens

Cornell University - Two Very Different Accounts Civil Complaint vs. 2024 Sworn Statement Summary I read through the 101-page civil complaint because I wanted to compare Jane Doe’s allegations in the lawsuit with the account Tompkins County DA Matthew Van Houten summarized from her initial six-page sworn statement to Cornell University Police in November 2024. They are substantially different. The lawsuit names Cornell University, Chi Phi’s local and national organizations, Tri-Delta organizations, fraternity leadership and advisors, Moonies Bar & Nightclub, and the seven individual students. Doe alleges she became heavily intoxicated at the Tri-Delta house, that the house mother observed her condition but nevertheless accompanied her to Moonies, and that Moonies served her at least one alcoholic drink despite her being marked as under 21. She alleges she had consumed approximately 10 drinks within three hours by the time she arrived at Chi Phi. From there, however, I think the clearest way to understand the differences is side by side. CIVIL COMPLAINT vs. 2024 SWORN-STATEMENT SUMMARY Her intoxication upon arriving at Chi Phi Civil complaint: She was severely intoxicated and already incapable of consenting. 2024 statement: She described herself as approximately 5 or 6 out of 10 intoxicated. — The initial threesome Civil complaint: Male 1 proposed a threesome while she was incapable of consenting, and the sexual activity occurred without her consent. 2024 statement: She said she agreed because she was attracted to Male 1 and, in her “drunken curiosity,” thought Male 1 and Male 2 wanting a threesome might mean they were gay. — How the first threesome ended Civil complaint: Male 1 became sleepy and wanted to take a nap. 2024 statement: She noticed Male 1 becoming sleepy and losing his erection and told Male 2 they needed to stop to make sure Male 1 was okay. Male 2 stopped. She then described caring for Male 2 when he became nauseated and checking on Male 1 while he slept. — Ketamine, marijuana and alcohol Civil complaint: She was pressured, plied, commanded, and instructed to consume ketamine, marijuana and additional alcohol. 2024 statement: She described being handed an unopened beer, later being asked whether she wanted more ketamine and then instructed to take more. She acknowledged taking ketamine multiple times. That doesn't necessarily resolve whether pressure or coercion occurred, but the descriptions are notably different. — The proposed foursome Civil complaint: I found no corresponding account of this exchange. 2024 statement: Male 1 woke up and wanted to join the sexual activity as a foursome. She said, “Hell No,” because she understood that would require anal sex. It did not happen. — Males 4–7 enter Civil complaint: She hid beneath the covers, felt unable to leave because her phone was across the room, and describes the additional men entering an increasingly coercive situation. 2024 statement: She also described hiding beneath the covers. Male 7 said something rude, apologized and grabbed her face and kissed her. She pushed him away. The men then complimented her appearance. Male 4 asked whether they could do ketamine from her body. She responded, “Sure.” — How the larger group encounter ended Civil complaint: Males 2, 3 and 5–7 eventually left. 2024 statement: Male 3 returned with another fraternity member who told everyone to get out. That outside intervention appears in both narratives, although the surrounding descriptions differ. — The final threesome with Males 1 and 4 Civil complaint: She was brought to another room, instructed to take additional ketamine, became completely incapacitated and alleges oral and vaginal sex was forced upon her until approximately 5:45 a.m., after which she lost consciousness. 2024 statement: She remembered snorting more ketamine and described herself as approximately 8 out of 10 intoxicated. Male 1 proposed another threesome because he wanted “redemption” for earlier in the night. She initially asked Male 1, “What happened to just you and me?” She couldn't remember how the sexual activity began but remembered vaginal and oral sex occurring. At approximately 5:45 a.m., she said she was tired and needed to turn in. According to the statement summary, both men stopped the threesome at that point, as far as she could remember. There are also important similarities Both accounts contain conduct that Doe describes as unwanted. She described Male 2 repeatedly reaching toward her vagina while they were kissing and her swatting his hand away. She described Male 7 kissing her without permission and her pushing him away. She also could not remember how the final threesome with Males 1 and 4 began. I don't see an allegation that Males 5, 6 or 7 had intercourse with her. That matters when this is routinely described online as “seven men raped her for seven hours.” Then there are the texts Neither account, as presented here, includes the subsequent text exchange with Male 1 that has now been publicly reported. In those messages, Doe reportedly said her memory was “super clouded,” acknowledged that everyone had been intoxicated, said “none of the sexual stuff was illegal,” said she enjoyed being with Male 1 and another man, and later suggested they smoke together again — just without the ketamine and the “extra 5 billion men.” Male 1's messages matter too. He reportedly described his own memory as “kinda fuzzy” and expressed regret that they were too intoxicated to shut everything down and kick people out before it got “way out of hand.” So which account is accurate? Doe's complete six-page sworn statement isn't public. What has been released is the DA's summary of portions he considered legally significant. We don't have the complete two-day police interview or the entire investigative file. And we haven't heard the accounts of all seven men. The civil complaint contains allegations, not findings of fact. But there are material differences between the account attributed to Doe shortly after the incident and the allegations made in the civil complaint nearly two years later. If the litigation proceeds, the sworn statement, complete campus police interview, contemporaneous text messages and other evidence could become extremely important, particularly if the defense argues that her later allegations materially differ from what she said closer in time to the events. That's why I keep saying there is more to this story than the headline “seven men raped a woman for seven hours.” The evidence we've seen so far tells a considerably more complicated story.