95% of men in a recent study admitted to using a method for getting sex from a woman they knew didn't want it. And all these researchers had to do was promise one thing that no one would ever find out. So the study comprised of 2,689 men. Their ages ranged from 18 to 34. These are not prisoners, These are just regular people, a community sample. Two-thirds of them were employed full-time and half of them were in relationships. The tactics include: “Get her away from everyone. Isolate her. Get her somewhere private and under your control. Keep her drunk if she's already drunk”. Some of them used physical restraints and two-thirds of these occasions ended in the sex he wanted. So these same men are in your comments right now or in my comments too typing “not all men”. Knowing damn well its fucking 95%
1
1
1
100
From Grok:
Key limitations that block broad extrapolation
• The sample is not representative. Participants were recruited via a Qualtrics online panel, screened for being men 18–34 who had a sexual encounter with a woman in the prior two years. The final sample was mostly heterosexual, U.S./Canadian, English-speaking, and relatively educated/employed. Online panel respondents are convenience samples with known selection effects (people willing to answer sensitive surveys for compensation), not probability samples of the general population. Authors themselves note limits on generalizability to other ages, cultures, sexual orientations, socioeconomic groups, and non-English contexts, and call for replication.
• Definitions are broad. The 36 strategies came from formative work and range from persistent verbal requests, flattery/deception, and peer involvement to isolation, intoxication facilitation, and physical restraint. Many of the most common ones (repeated asking, saying what she wants to hear) fall into the category of verbal pressure or persuasion that other research treats differently from rape or assault. Prior systematic reviews of college men find average self-reported rates of any sexual perpetration around 25–35% (and lower for rape), with large variation depending on questionnaire wording; non-standardized or broader measures produce higher numbers. Equating the full range here with “sexual force” or “forcing” inflates the figure relative to narrower legal or common definitions.
• Self-report under strong anonymity emphasis. The design stressed complete anonymity and framed the survey as giving men “their side of the story.” Self-reports cannot be verified. The prompt focused on occasions the men themselves viewed as attempts with known reluctance/non-consent and asked about success; authors note this can bias toward reporting completed attempts. Patterns (more verbal/coercive than physical force) are consistent with other work, but the absolute rates are outliers.
• Scale and consistency problems. If nearly all young men in a sexually active sample were routinely succeeding at this with new acquaintances at the reported rates, the implied volume of non-consensual encounters would be extremely large. That sits uneasily with victimization surveys, crime statistics, and other perpetration studies without invoking massive definitional differences or underreporting on every other measure. The study focuses only on no-prior-history encounters, not established relationships.
“All men” is an unjustified leap
791
Men are not responsible for how women dress. Your response is a common manipulation tactic.
Everyone should dress modestly, it’s not a female only thing, although they seem to challenge the boundaries more often. No one wants to see a man’s cock budge either.
1
25
You’re disputing that statement? It’s actually very well studied and documented. It’s also obvious from any anecdotal report, ask any guy his experience. Fun fact, even when the survey is self reported, women themselves report having higher body counts than women in previous generations. Imagine what the real numbers are (not relying on self reports)
1
15
The BitcoinPuppets ran for the presidency on world peace 🌎 ☮️ and then started WW3. Vote for NodeMonkes in the midterms 🗳️ 🐵
86
Diesel is cooked boys, I blame Bitcoin puppets for the entire war and straight of Hormuz crisis
1
53
Amazing collection ordinals collection @Cigarettesbtc on the mother chain by @banknotes_btc
History on the blockchain is a literal game changer. I believe it’s only minting for about a week. Mint price is only a few dollars 💵
70
Astronomers discover a new planet, BLAKE2b. It appears to be like a second earth and hospitable to life, even though a second earth is unnecessary since the first earth is completely fine
1
5
167
The banking system is not instant. It feel instant, but takes days to weeks to settle a transaction. If only there was like an internet coin, maybe made outa of bits that might solve this problem 🧐
2
3
134
