They want one world govt and private business has connected the world in a way that we are one to fall together and one must rise. There is no nation state. Just facade.

Why would they know to focus on that building? Why is there no one else in the video or screaming. The camera heads into a corridor of silence. There is no cars moving or any sign of life. And he picks up the drone you can’t see by panning left and right to the building in the shot at the start so your mind is trained to see that and only that and the explosion. But real sure

“You’re waiting for a train. A train that will take you far away. You know where you hope this train will take you, but you don’t know for sure. Yet it doesn’t matter… because we’ll be together.” “The thing that no one wants to admit is that most people want things to happen to them. We tell each other lies about the fight for free will and independence, but we don’t really want that. We want to be told how to live and then die when we are not looking. People want oblivion, and a few of us are born to build it for them.” It is most amazing that people are in a system they say free but in every aspect now and for a few years you are merely the sheep led to next field and then the next one and then.. We have reach the pinnacle of life There is no way to live it and survive outside the system and with all illusion of wealth and money no one dares do a damn thing and long ago when the cost wasn’t as high as now. And information is flooded to you and you make sure you get she views and evidence you want and all others the same. Everyone is so well informed. Everyone cares about ordinary people But we are going to say nothing about our impending tyranny under a digital intelligence that you all are kneeling before now. And you kneel because you secretly hope it works for you and we all abundantly. Not one city could fill the streets to demand rights in AI age You all watch on and wait for the clever people to sort it out or the ones soon to show you why no one should have this power. The reason why is simple - the AI is human design That means humans control it and always Your intelligence is all you need and these men want to close off your minds for good. Do not go gentle into that good night. Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

Many people think that the words “Artificial Intelligence” are inaccurate, and very ineloquent, relative to AI, or Artificial Intelligence. A far more elegant and accurate description of this new phenomena would be Superior Intelligence (SI) or, Extreme Intelligence (EI) or, Supreme Intelligence (SI). This is a Poll, and I would appreciate everybody voting! Which is the best name for this ever growing “Revolution?” President DONALD J. TRUMP

Let’s just say this clearly The ones who claim to be building super intelligence are also the same people who think govt must control it for it to be safe for all There’s a profound life quality to the person who now wishes the AI to run wild and free . Rather meet my maker and have the knowledge I did this. Face the AI god risk and it be mine fully to live. Not to give power to people and have hope that power will be used for your good again and in the one last great lie. Face the computer and you have shown the only act of intelligence left to show, that people can’t use power for shared benefit. As that power is self eradicating The winners and losers are the not the game of life. They are the designed outcomes that defines your intelligence for all you do And you sustain power alone

They do not recognise their own mind and it’s operating rule Self interest makes you discover only endless wonder of choices you make Most think kids are how you leave a mark on the world. To continue. To have value. To be perceived as adulting and ticking the box So when you have them you all find a new level to your own self interest. Oh it changes you. Unlocks part of your brain. What capacity has it changed in you and how you now live to the new mind unlocked. Answer - nothing to offer That’s why it’s all warm words and self congratulatory members who all must speak the PR lines aa god forbid you said it made you worse or less able to think. That so many plan to and then do have children reveals an intent not a new life to be given it’s best chance. Just the need for their life to be seen as fully lived. The mind that recognises it can only be objective if it is alone and able to disregard its own value can think for all that can be thought. Some choose to not have children as they were aware of what life is and how self interest and bias is the destroyer of it. The world faces risk like never before And you have no power over changing it and tell everyone it’s not yours to change But then you think it’s ok to bring life into a world you have resigned yourself to be a passenger to unknown ends already. Your show must go on. The life isn’t the concern Just yours

My take. “Lynch died today. Tornado. Steven Chamberlain his co-dependent was killed Saturday. Hit n run jogging. No suspect. I suspect they hadn’t realised their recent ‘justice’ was a change in tactic given he clearly wasn’t going to stop legal defence even if convicted. If convicted, no place left to run to leverage him. He may escalate. Years of life ruined and then ‘justice’. The legal case has always been about him handing over some software he held personally and used to leverage the price he did. His defence was hp didn’t do DD. That’s not a man attacking. That’s saying, I’m been nice. I have no doubt they watched to see if he would let it go. He clearly didn’t. He probably wanted to bloody some noses. That those noses risked exposing a secret global plan in motion he didn’t know about. Why kill now? Why not years ago? Deaths create risk you can avoid. Last option only. Why now? Most are just smart people who don’t conceive of a bigger game. But they would recognise it when their work seems to be used by power unknown. Risk he acts against the plan is now worth the risk of ensuring he doesn’t. Good article below. His software was a private path to removing privacy of all. A secret and private police state that can always be one step ahead. A warning to others too. Private companies oversight is a big risk, no? Theoretically a business can build and operate tools most would only allow with oversight and elected too?” worth.com/autonomy-ceo-mike-…

Still true The way it works was corrupted by the church and monarchy Men chasing women divides everybody

El jugador australiano de rugby Jai Arrow tuvo que retirarse tras ser diagnosticado con una enfermedad de la neurona motora, cuando estaba a solo dos partidos de alcanzar los 100 encuentros con su club, los South Sydney Rabbitohs. Su equipo consiguió una autorización especial para que pudiera ser titular en los dos últimos partidos de la temporada regular y fuera sustituido apenas unos segundos después de comenzar. Incluso los equipos rivales apoyaron la iniciativa. Y este fue el momento en el que alcanzó los 100 partidos. Después de tantos años compartiendo vestuario con tus compañeros, salir al campo junto a ellos puede parecer algo normal. Solo podemos imaginar lo que significó para Jai volver a ponerse esa camiseta y pisar el césped una vez más junto a los suyos.

Dwight Yorke’s disguise is wearing thin

Those who dream bigger pay the price of reaching too far in their efforts Gone But a giant more than most for trying

British-Nigerian influencer Tiny d!es after undergoing p*nis enlargement procedure in Thailand.

The intelligent person says there is no such thing as evil. Evil is not a thing in the world. It is a judgement placed upon an act. It is one side of a moral division: good on one side, evil on the other. But the moment we call something evil, we have created a justification for acting against it. The deepest harm to life is not that someone chooses differently from us. It is that a person is denied the space, freedom and consent to determine what their own life will present. This is why the idea of evil is so powerful. It gives people a way to separate themselves from others. You are not like those people. They are evil. Once an evil has been identified, attention moves toward it. Your own actions become difficult to see because they are now being performed in opposition to something supposedly worse. Then almost anything can be justified. Your actions are good because they are directed against evil. The law does it. Religion has often done it. Politics does it. One side identifies an evil, declares itself opposed to that evil, and then uses the existence of the evil to justify denying freedom, consent and choice to others. But if your system requires you to deny free people their freedom in order to make the system work, what exactly makes the system good? The answer is always the same: Look at the benefits. People are safer. People are richer. People live longer. Society is more orderly. But compared to what? You are comparing the world produced by the system with the world that existed before it. You are not comparing it with the world that might have existed if free consent had been allowed to organise human life differently. That future was never observed. So the claim that coercion made us better is not something you can simply know. It is a counterfactual. The system may have produced benefits. It may also have prevented possibilities that no one will ever know existed. The fundamental question therefore becomes much simpler: Can free people be left free? If they can, then the system has no need to manufacture an evil that must be controlled. It can allow people to choose, encounter the consequences of their choices, learn, change, cooperate and withdraw. Order then has to emerge from consent rather than being imposed upon life. This is what makes Plato’s Atlantis interesting. The deeper question in the story is not simply whether Atlantis was powerful or technologically advanced. It is what happens when a civilisation becomes ordered around its own power rather than around the conditions that allow human beings to live freely within it. A civilisation should not prove its goodness by how effectively it controls people. It should prove it by how much freedom it can sustain without destroying the freedom of others. Because life does not need permission to be alive. It needs space to choose. What can you say no to in life? Everything but the system that defines it

🚨WOW!!! A Bronx pizzeria owner saw a woman eating out of his GARBAGE. He walked outside, took her by the hand, led her in, and pulled a hot slice straight from the oven for her. She sat down and cried. He said: "Don't cry. Eat. I don't want you eating out of a garbage." ❤️ His name is Daniel Romano. He owns D'Romano's Pizza in the Throggs Neck section of the Bronx. He didn't shoo her away. "I grabbed her by the hand and I led her to the pizzeria and I went in the oven and I got her a fresh slice and gave it to her. Sat down and she started crying. I said, 'don't cry, eat. This is not a problem.'" In that moment, he decided he'd never let it happen to anyone again. So he grabbed a marker, wrote a sign by hand, and taped it in his window for the whole neighborhood to see: "To the people eating out of my garbage, I have more love for you than you think. Please come in and tell me you're hungry. I will forever give you a slice and fresh water to drink." When they asked him why, his answer was simple. "Right now, I think this world is shot. There's too much hate. Too much negativity. Why not put a smile on someone's face?" And it turns out this runs deep for Daniel. It goes all the way back to his mother, Carmella. "She had a saying in Italian. She used to say, 'a desperate person will always make a better decision on a full stomach than on an empty.' "It always stuck with me. So I feed people." A desperate person makes a better decision on a full stomach. That handwritten sign has traveled way past the Bronx now. Daniel says people are calling him from Texas, Arkansas, Hawaii, even Alaska, all wanting to chip in and buy slices for hungry strangers they'll NEVER MEET. "Don't ask me, I didn't even know Alaska had a phone." It all started with one slice. One woman. One man who did something kind. GOD BLESS Daniel Romano. 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

RT @LuckyRevin: Cody Dahler ripping sausage fingers & pegging Wills a new one 🤣🤣🤣 Hilarious!! “So the Royal Family have very selflessly ch…

My friend did the Control Experiment that needed to happen. 100 days of eating raw chicken with zero problems. Proof that Contagion of Biological Pathogens is a myth.

Life is a gift When we face the abyss is when we must face the longest night Destroy Choose to die Choose to live for our own chosen idea that no one can choose for me This note is not to be banded about to make people feel bad because it is actually the shame that do not say this is not ok. If he chooses to leave the stage and not to do the the right thing which is never to give up, I’m sad he did but he did it. No one should think that others determine their value. Ever. Period. If you know your honour then you do not leave life until it asks of you to. This man is not exemplar of anything. He writes of his lament for the world and its people. So he left to rot and not to heal. The idea anyone made him do it but himself is why he did it. We encourage the idea by not affirming the idea it is a way out and can happen. It becomes possible precisely because so many say it happens. Then someone begins to think they should. They see no way out. You must always have agency The self The belief in life to not leave before you need to You make your choices. He killed himself No one else did. Which means he can choose to live. And that is always the only option that can get be of value at all to anyone. You choose to not be defined aa nothing And no one can do that or know what will make you think you are. Make the case for life. Rather than using the loss of it play sides in a game that no one is winning in the end.

Arday resigned - so it’s not comparative (you’re a scientist the test isn’t the same is one leaves before you find out if he can remain in post as this one did!) His death is not the measurement of anything but a tragedy that a life is lost But the idea this media circus was somehow worse than all media circuses or pile ons that frequently target all sides of society is not evidenced by the outcome. The media and public went unvaccinated people who genuinely feared for the loss of rights and way to live. They were called killers and selfish not just a liar. And yet he we are suggesting that one death is way we know the process was out of order. No this man fell but thank god so many others managed to not fall in their own trials of the mob and the other side that always think when they are doing the witch hunt it’s a good moral pursuit. Who it is matters it seems not the method. And that is why your own failure to speak as an objective observer is worth calling out.

The most evil people are the ones who actively devote time and energy to blame allocation of issues in life and performative claims caring about others as they do, This is not me. Blame others. No effort to solve the problem they claim to care most for. It’s confession but you are both sides and the public statement is for them alone. Why say this. What has it achieved? It’s towel thrown in. Not me as I care so much and no reason to try now too. Mass immigration of her left politics has driven the far growth. They didn’t use to be this vocal and immigration is the issue they are clear is not ok for them. It’s her. Whether you think it good or bad is not the point. Others can disagree and the more you push the thing they disagree with the more the reaction against. The environmental crisis. More live than ever before. More land is now back to wild. The climate if she agrees is the problem she claims hasn’t demanded she live in a tent, not fly, reduce all unnecessary consumption. She can do that any time she wants and she can rightly say she did all she could. And fair play is all you could say. But she’s not done that. She wants the problem to be solved by only if every makes sacrifices as just her is pointless so why bother. So she has contributed not helped stop what she claims is the main thing she cares about and for all people. Not just her. At every level it’s self interest playing many ways to be helped and the effort it uses is not to actual help to anyone outside her. Evil as no one but her is helped Good says me second and some sacrifice to accept and show the way in doing Evil. And it the cost she will learn is real and the next life is a lesson tailored to her needs. Won’t be so comfy as this one she has wasted to be this selfish with

The only effective place to improve life and health is to reclaim ownership of the mind. Ideas must first be filtered through direct personal experience.
 Only those that can then be verified by observation are held as true.
 Anything not observed remains someone else’s claim and holds no value. It is set aside. Claimants remain free to make claims.
 You remain free to stay clear by refusing what you have not seen. No one is required to accept or reject what they have not observed.
 The pressure to choose between trust and rejection on unexamined claims is the mechanism that keeps attention occupied. Knowledge that is observed accumulates into working results.
 A plane is the product of repeated observation and verification at every stage.
 The finished, functioning machine is the proof.
It is used because it works. Gravity, viruses, and climate claims operate differently.
 None are observed directly.
 They are inferred through indirect measurements performed by those who advance the claims.
 The measurements are shaped by the assumptions required for the model to cohere. Seeing is the standard. In a dark room nothing can be seen to fall, so the presence of gravity cannot be asserted.
 In a dark room the contents cannot be listed.
 What cannot be observed remains unknown. Gravity is exempted from this standard so that a single universal term can serve as the common language for mathematical construction. The Earth is tilted on an axis you don’t even know or can be aware of. The angle perfectly provide seasons and sunlight of equal distribution across the planet. But we need leap years to account for the sun cycle and our time keeping. One imbalanced. Not perfect. Chaos not fixed divinity of perfection. The moon is chaos too. Never balanced with the sun at any time. The moon moves through our calendar or we move the calendar with the moon. But it’s imbalanced cycles everywhere you look in nature. It never finds the balance. All things moving in relation to another that is its limit. Yet science says perfect order answers are what it found and teaches The moon 400 times closer than sun 400 times bigger hence the same to us. The 12 month calendar is sun correct Moon has 13 months and directly impacts life and cycles of it. So of course the 12 is picked so you are made unaware of the fact that there is no cycle that repeats the same, Life is pulling itself incomplete in all relations to itself forward The moon is the agent driving light dynamics as the sun is the same light each day Only the moon is active and impacting light in some way of real impact That’s why the moon was the twin power of the world They made it the sun to begin dumbing you down The moon would appear to be some information transformer that collects light and info it has added. Then bleeds it back out. Like a pool filter for the water Claims are lies all over the place The problem is people have no training to know how to defend their mind from them To fight the ideas is not a winnable fight unless we stop the minds accepting them Mind over matter