Tim Pickles Perspective Field Theory · Independent writer / To seek the truth, but never hold it

Wandsworth, United Kingdom
Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Minimum likes
They want one world govt and private business has connected the world in a way that we are one to fall together and one must rise. There is no nation state. Just facade.
41
Replying to @Robbie_Render
But this video is Moscow So why would this be shared? Russia has a digital firewall as does China So does Ukraine. Nothing digital out of these places is to be trusted. Remember at the start of Covid how suddenly China content floods the screens. Or all those people locked tower blocks in cities wide. Then nothing can be found in daily life. Most people operate unaware of what digital is, even as they introduce you to a type of tech that generate image. If seeing is believing then the weapon is to target your mind and that’s very easy when everyone operates to the concept self interest that all people think it is intuitive. But it isn’t
1
34
Replying to @Robbie_Render
Because bombs can hit the wrong building. A drone has to targeted by a controller. So if they hit a tower block by choice that would be a war crime. Which is why it’s so odd to show.
2
18
Why would they know to focus on that building? Why is there no one else in the video or screaming. The camera heads into a corridor of silence. There is no cars moving or any sign of life. And he picks up the drone you can’t see by panning left and right to the building in the shot at the start so your mind is trained to see that and only that and the explosion. But real sure
Crazier footage keeps coming out of Moscow…
1
199
Replying to @pearlythingz
So women built the patriarchy As they pretend to be useless as it suits them and men do what is required to please So imagine blaming men for something women show daily they have power to end as soon as they choose to put themselves second and make men do things for the world she wants to be fair and just all along. Oh we can make men do anything but not end our own system of second status life and power abuse. Women gravitate the very wealth and power of the patriarchal system but they have won the battle for their female status and freedom to define their own life. The great thing is men are flawed and can’t hide it or pretend to. Women have used their decades of progress and independence of life to invent ever more ways to not answer what they are to want at all if the choice is all theirs. Find a woman that sleeps with the men who do the right thing. Who defend all as if themselves The one who speaks his truth so that all can see they can speak The men who sacrifice their best outcome and do not need to do so. Men must give their body and life to more than themselves to make any world of freedom for anyone possible. The greatest men are the ones who you don’t get the enjoy the attention of and the long life planned. But they are the only men who can make your life have a hope of knowing it can make choices to make those men never die out. When men chase and focus on you. They are not a collective body that can defend the whole Which is why marriage and purity exists To make women be object to win Make men have to come and compete And power formed that never could
2
291
Replying to @CharlotteCGill
Paying lip service
1
2
64
Replying to @Theo_TJ_Jordan
The funny thing is that the capitalist competes for power in scale and control of the material world The left likes to say it’s anticapitalist but they all work and live in the capitalist system they call home and basically fetishise tax rates they dream of imposing on the top. But that’s it. There is no fight to change it at all. Just noise. They love noise. To look like you believe it is just the same as actual believing and that’s why they don’t fight to end the system. Everybody knows they would and want to. So why prove what all know? So what could replace the old fight? Victim status Tell your voters they are victims of others who act against them or once did They are all encouraged to say how they are a victim and all are only allies and so what begins is the growth of groups that come in waves of the victims of the month and they all come out. Then trans was a wave that always will come in even more mad ways as the victim status is now like school shooters It’s how you get attention to you and this is the real need the people have They don’t matter until they claim ever mad identities as to make it free from challenge it must be utterly batshit. You can’t reason against it. It’s what it is and they demand forms of blood trophy that the society officially gives some way of saying they are as claimed and we see them. And the academics are just ego and money motivated word salad experts who see that you can claim expertise in batshit and own the field as the all knowing ones who get paid very well to make this stuff and share it It’s all a competition they are in with each other for Victim status and then justice Just as capitalists compete for power the left competes for the most pity they can claim and win the most special of people of lefty special people there is
1
1
3
155
Replying to @accountingetc
The self interested human will believe anything it needs to if it helps their own position even when that’s to admit if they don’t demand truth in all things then who else will? And if no one does how does this go well? It can’t It won’t And it’s all of us to do the work As we know it’s all we can do If no one else does then why does that make your effort wasted? It doesn’t But the audience will say it is. To do the right thing demands no care for the audience and their views
Replying to @ProfSteveFuller
1. Power and consent Neither familiar economic system is a sustainable order by itself. Both operate as machines for accumulating power. When people must sell their time to survive, they stop choosing as agents whose values track their own lives. They accept work, products, and rules they would refuse if refusal did not threaten survival. The decisive line is free consent. As soon as some can be compelled to do what they would not otherwise accept, concentrated power becomes possible and then has to protect itself. Compulsion—not “the market” or “the state” as labels—is the original move. 2. History as story, not liberation Church and Crown were coercion first. Magna Carta was armed men near the king securing their own take, not a gift of rights to everyone. Mass voting was less a right seized from below than enrollment into a system the enrolled still cannot steer. Laws then multiply to serve power. Official milestones are stories that make the arrangement look like consent. 3. The present arrangement Resources, energy, communication, and knowledge sit inside private legal forms that are hard to map. States run on debt paper and on supplies they do not fully control. Products increasingly address secondary effects and manufactured wants rather than needs people would name for themselves. Information feeds shape what is thinkable, so speech and work feel less like the person’s own. People often do not notice that the world is not what they take it to be, because the capacity to attend has been conditioned away. Left and right economic answers look like opposition while they share the same ground: capital and property rights treated as if they were natural law. That is the trick. Those rights do not create anything people could not create under other ways of deciding what to spend time on. People make things; capital scales a particular order and then life has to fit that order. Cities exploded as rural populations were pushed off land that law now allowed to be used for profit alone. The system is not at risk so long as the argument stays inside those two sides. 4. Technology as platform, not just product Large information and energy systems are dual-use whether or not that is advertised. Work on driverless movement trains general competence at acting in an open, changing world. Public clumsy robots keep expectations low. Computation that recalls and produces data is not intelligence. Intelligence as a lived act Intelligence is not a thing anyone possesses. It is how a life attends. Attention never takes in the whole field. A person chooses a focus; meaning comes from triangulating that focus against what surrounds it. What each person receives is therefore irreducibly particular. New ideas appear when new inputs shift that triangulation, not when a single stored input is replayed. A computer does not choose a living focus and does not inhabit a surround that can injure or correct it, so it cannot generate understanding the way a person does. 5. Time, solitude, and wasted attention You never leave the now. Memories and imagined scenes are not a past and a future you inhabit. Time as a dimension you move through is an invented frame someone else supplied. Once the future is treated as a place you can go to, know, and control, attention leaves the present and is spent on imagined paths treated as real. That is a conditioned misuse of the same faculty that, used in the now, is intelligence. Attention is what the system needs you not to notice, because it is the opening of the mind’s potential. Endless diversions are supplied so it is wasted. That is why cave, wilderness, and desert appear as places of transformation: alone, in dead space, the mind speaks, and what it speaks has value. In ordinary life that speech is buried under everything already known as “truth.” Dichotomies (including the two economic sides) look like thought while they keep that overlay in place. Convergence of thought = control
3
53
Replying to @TheFreds
Because success is not theirs to decide and they hate it He believes he’s creating art Real music How popular James Blunt is shouldn’t matter then But it does and they share the hate but reveal their ego is unable to not hate It’s all they can do to reclaim true ‘success’
7
419
Replying to @DineshDSouza
Socratic method is not curious Someone has to be made to think more of what they had settled upon The only purpose is not to learn of the better answer but to learn there really isn’t ever an answer that you can agree on. It makes anyone who practises it wise As wisdom is knowing all that you don’t know Almost every idea that you live according to is actually a lie imposed by power that now seems truthful for the fact it’s the only ideas most know of and can think of. Religion cannot be true as life is lived by unique people and felt only. Language is abstraction to facilitate shared understanding God shouldn’t be a shared concept that each feels only as they could know. Two people can’t watch the same sunset and write about it even close to the same What is felt doesn’t lend to same ideas. Useful for life. Ideas are the fuel.
3
117
Replying to @LGB_1962
He has to be. If he doesn’t back him he’s got no one else. This is what is so funny about any activism. Unless you are prepared to walk away from your natural ally the natural ally once in power won’t give a shit about you. They don’t need to.
2
85
Replying to @CharlotteCGill
Just coco pops and feel like such a fool now
21
442
Replying to @nxt888
No One Is Inside the Machine No one is outside the machine. We are the machine. Every choice made now becomes part of the conditions from which every future choice is made. There is no distant future in which someone else will finally fix what we refuse to fix ourselves. The great human weakness is not simply that we lie to others. It is that we desperately want to be fooled by ourselves. We want what we want, and then the mind constructs a logical explanation for why the thing we wanted was right. An idea can be perfectly coherent inside your head and still be completely false. The only way to discover that is to meet reality, test it, and accept what happens. Self-interest is both our nature and our limit. A lie may appear profitable because its immediate cost is visible and its consequences are not. But information changes behaviour. A lie changes what another person believes, which changes what they do, which changes what others encounter. The cost spreads through a system no one can fully measure. And when you lie, you give everyone else permission to lie. Now you don’t know who is telling you the truth. Worse: you know you aren’t. A society built on people pretending they do not deceive themselves becomes incapable of knowing what is real. Truth therefore cannot be something you defend only when it is profitable. Sometimes truth costs everything. You do not calculate whether truth is worth the price. You either remain faithful to what you believe is true, or you sell it when the price becomes inconvenient. Socrates understood the extremity of this. If remaining alive requires abandoning the truth by which you understand your life, then survival itself can become the surrender of the thing that made the life worth defending. If you cannot defend your truth, you cannot claim to defend your life. And politics cannot rescue us from this. We repeatedly hand enormous power to people and institutions without defining what success actually means, then argue endlessly about which side should control them. A government without clear purposes, measurable outcomes and consequences for failure can become anything to anyone. We call the next election a solution because admitting that no election can substitute for the choices of millions of people would force us to face something far more uncomfortable: the machine is us. We have no final answer. But we can know when an answer has failed. And we can stop pretending otherwise. The first responsibility is therefore not to control everyone else. It is to stop lying to yourself. See what is there. Test what you believe. Speak what you know. Accept what you don’t. And make the next choice your own. The better world is not out there to make It is within you and only truth can set you free As truth makes understanding real and connected to reality by lived distribution of ideas. Myths speak of the end times where chaos unfolded and imposed from above. The truth lives or it is a debt that comes to be collected when the systems of lies no longer hold minds together. Then reality snaps. Self interest and no profit of civility means everyone for themselves. The world cleanses those who are blind and act for them alone The book of revelations is taking the myth and making it their own god’s actions. They know what unfolds. To have the veil lifted is the revelation. Ordinary people are monsters if conditions shift to make that best option for them The system made civility pay. But it wasn’t real choice to be civil. Just a show to play to norms and make you more likely to profit by doing it. If you take a side, you are a monster. Compromise and mutual understanding are how shared life is born It has no side. It demands you choose more than yourself
1
3
7
5,147
Replying to @mikecosgrove
Conservatism was invaded by capitalism maximising and most still can’t see that Thatcher was the first to open the door with Reagan. They unleashed the private capital but failed to recognise why the it wasn’t so free to begin with and politically no one had a reason to remind themselves. We now see the consequences of a controlled system but privately that appears free.
2
100
Replying to @OMApproach
Truth Do not read and think watchers or angels are gods or linked to one. Almost all myth is to try and capture types of human nature and acts with lessons about what types of acts can cause to all humans that are touched by them. Perhaps B&K told lies dressed up as knowledge to make them appear wise and special and thus they blinded those they taught to think what they saw was not what is was but they can’t know. As long as events unfold to truth they knew and could predict then they can make stories about what it means or how it works and then the rest are in awe. Enoch shared all he knew. Truth. Not a version he could use for his own gain.
2
1,167
Replying to @CharlotteCGill
Boris was called a murderer and for cake and a drink surrounded by the same people he worked during Covid to run the country the left subjected him to their vile hate. No virus risk to anyone increased by the act. The reason for rules was to stop a virus. Didn’t matter for the left. When they pile on, when they throw hate and whip up a mob it’s ok. It’s different. And no one died so proof they aren’t bad. Imagine how blind and thoughtless you must be to think if someone is broken and dies is the way to know if you were wrong or not in how you behave. They are used to create law as you suggest and don’t see they are useful idiots told they are good to make them blind to what causes they throw themselves into simply to look good. The right gets used too. But to back law that protects wealth and privacy. No side is winning in the end.
2
186
Replying to @trevgoes4th
But she seemed not like so many who find fame, and especially as a female. She seemed to hold herself in more respect and not simply seek all you can get by using all that you have. Sadly, that respect may have become a burden as the world tends not to care either way. Which is why it becomes one.
2
16
Replying to @DrAseemMalhotra
Arday resigned - so it’s not comparative (you’re a scientist the test isn’t the same is one leaves before you find out if he can remain in post as this one did!) His death is not the measurement of anything but a tragedy that a life is lost But the idea this media circus was somehow worse than all media circuses or pile ons that frequently target all sides of society is not evidenced by the outcome. The media and public went unvaccinated people who genuinely feared for the loss of rights and way to live. They were called killers and selfish not just a liar. And yet he we are suggesting that one death is way we know the process was out of order. No this man fell but thank god so many others managed to not fall in their own trials of the mob and the other side that always think when they are doing the witch hunt it’s a good moral pursuit. Who it is matters it seems not the method. And that is why your own failure to speak as an objective observer is worth calling out.
1
1
8
725
Replying to @GadSaad
Academia is the pursuit of a truth that doesn’t exist to find The more you think you can know the answer the more obvious it is you don’t as all you do narrow and narrow what truth is claimed and observed. And each new level makes new looks at your new claims and this shows issues and not clear cut and so you go deeper and make the answer ever more precise and irrelevant to anyone’s life So they do the same thing in all answers and fields they compete in They become more absurd in what is true and no one actually is impacted by the truths they make the one issue of issues Trans is this. An absurdity you choose to say is real as an issue and then demand it is met and sorted to restore justice for a fictional life choice. You can’t even meet in debate on it It’s not real and logical. It is made to be so. And this is how academia claim to be experts in their own imagination they insist is true and they should know.
1
4
292
Replying to @RealitySalesman
The intolerance and cost of not believing is the stick The heaven and good standing with some men who run the mafia is the carrot The real force can be used to keep the flock and defeat the ones not bought in The risk of the heaven or hell are genius for flock management The risk remains the same the rules fully adaptable to keep your flock in the safe modern space they need to stay without conflicting demands of decency that crop up if rules don’t shift. It’s not even a hedge to believe As the idea isn’t yours you have learnt by middle men Belief in your own original idea is real value. As you learnt to believe it. But you can’t learn of a god beyond maybe one exists You cannot learn of the structure of all the power and operation as you never see it all. So it’s made up. How can you learn of hell in the world that ain’t where it is. No one can know what comes next. Who went and came back? No one So who knows this? Oh the word of god No one else heard this voice and it remains silent now. How odd. If you buy into god like any idea that ain’t yours and you believe it then you chose to hand over life and its potential Why can’t you just test and learn what ideas are real to you and observed in life for you. Praying doesn’t get rewarded at any measured level. So why do it? Belief it might help With a power that is so big you might as well try But the power is not seen or observed So is it there? No, If you are presented two bridges across the canyon do you choose the one that is a bridge you can cross or the one where no bridge is observed but a man charges £5 and tells you it’s quicker and safer but you can’t see it? That’s religion and anyone who believes isn’t able to look at anything objectively again You cannot claim to be able to distil truth and also hold truths of no experience directly of their truth. Anything now gets in the mind You have no filter. You can make the imaginary as real and have no basis to do so. And this is how they poison minds forever Once anyone can claim a belief of no shared observed evidence we are in the land of agreeing that all can see what none can see. We are blind mice. Nothing is real now. And they love that land as truth is now not a shared pursuit And we can’t agree anything ever more
1
2
90