Brian Bartlett retweeted
Name a chronic disease the pharmaceutical industry has cured in your lifetime. Diabetes: managed. 100 years of insulin, and the count has gone up every year. Blood pressure: managed. For life. Cholesterol: managed. For life, from 40. Depression: managed. A third of the people on it have been on it for a decade. Reflux: managed. The leaflet says 8 weeks. The average is years. Asthma, arthritis, eczema, migraine, obesity: managed, managed, managed, managed, injected. Then in 2014 something slipped through. A drug that actually cured hepatitis C, in 12 weeks, for good. In 2018 Goldman Sachs wrote a note to its clients about it. The title was a question: is curing patients a sustainable business model? Their answer was no. The cure had shrunk the market. The hepatitis C business fell from $12 billion a year to under $4 billion, because the patients kept getting better and not coming back. The bank advised investors to look for conditions that are chronic, and treatments that are taken for life. That is not a conspiracy theory. It is an investment note, and it says the quiet part in a font. A cure is a one-off sale. A patient is an annuity, and the whole industry is priced on the annuity. Nobody is going to cure the thing you have, because the thing you have is their best product. But a plate can. That is why it is extreme.
82
1,049
3,308
41,789
Brian Bartlett retweeted
DISNEY SAYS THE LAYOFFS ARE EXTREMELY PAINFUL. SO WAS THE TICKET. When I was a kid, my parents trusted one company without reading the fine print. If it said Disney on the box, it went in the VCR. No research, no screening, no checking a parents guide. The Little Mermaid. Beauty and the Beast. Aladdin. The Lion King. My mother put them on and went to make dinner because she knew exactly what was coming out of that television. That trust was the most valuable asset the company ever owned. It was not the castle. It was not the mouse. It was a mother in a kitchen who did not have to check. Then they spent it. They decided the movies were a place to deliver messages instead of stories, and parents noticed. Even Bob Iger admitted in 2023 that the studio had lost sight of entertaining first. You do not usually get the CEO confessing. Then they priced the family out of the parks. This year, a single day at Magic Kingdom crossed 200 dollars for the first time in its 55 year history. Peak days hit 209. That is up roughly 38 percent since 2020. And waiting in line, the one thing that used to be free, became a product. FastPass cost nothing. It became Genie Plus at 15 dollars in 2021. Now the Multi Pass runs up to 45 a person at Magic Kingdom and the Premier Pass runs as high as 449. Four hundred and forty nine dollars. Per person. To skip lines at a park you already paid to enter. A family of four can spend more than 800 dollars on admission alone for one day, before a churro. Then they let ESPN and ABC drift. ESPN went from roughly 100 million homes in 2011 to about 55 million, and the answer was to raise the streaming price to 31.99. And now the president of the company says the layoffs are extremely painful. Three hundred more this week, mostly in HR and IT, after a thousand in April. She says technology set its sights on their business. No. Technology did not empty those park lines and those living rooms. The pricing did. The lectures did. The slow decision to treat the family as a wallet instead of a guest did. Every brand that tries this learns the same lesson. Bud Light offended the people who bought it and lost its spot as the best selling beer in America. Pepsi raised prices until people stopped buying the volume, and an activist investor showed up. Nike walked away from the stores its customers shopped in, chased margin, and watched the stock fall by more than half. McDonald's took out the playgrounds, raised the prices, and is now spending 8.5 billion dollars to figure out where the families went. Annoy your customers, price them out, and sell them something that offends the people who can still afford you. It ends the same way every single time. So here is the call. Your wallet is a vote and you cast it every week. Spend it with companies that remember who they work for. Be the mom in the kitchen again, just with more questions this time. They built that trust over sixty years. They can earn it back the same way they lost it. One family at a time. 🦋
146
517
2,557
80,831
Brian Bartlett retweeted
This month marks 500 years since a small, illegal book began slipping into England hidden in bales of cloth and barrels of goods. It was William Tyndale’s English New Testament, and it changed the world. Published in 1526, it was the first English NT translated directly from the original Greek… but Tyndale was far more than a translator. He was a scholar, theologian, linguist, reformer, and martyr whose work helped reshape the English Bible, the English language, and the Reformation itself. Here is why we need to remember this remarkable man: 📖 Tyndale believed Scripture belonged in the hands of ordinary Christians, not locked behind Latin, clerical authority and scholarly privilege. When challenged by a wealthy clergyman, he famously declared: "I defy the Pope and all his laws. If God spares my life, ere many years I will cause a boy that driveth the plough to know more of the Scriptures than thou dost." To do it, he fled England and spent years translating in hiding while authorities hunted him. 🗣️ He shaped the English language. Every time you say: • “The salt of the earth.” • “My brother’s keeper” • “Eat, drink and be merry” • “Go the extra mile” • “Fighting the good fight” • “Broken-hearted” …among so many other phrases, you are quoting Tyndale. When English lacked words for Hebrew concepts, he invented them: atonement, Passover, scapegoat, mercy seat. He even included the first glossary in an English Bible to help readers understand his translation choices. His extraordinary gift for English became the foundation for the King James Version, weaving his words into the very fabric of our language. 👑 The King James translators couldn't improve upon his work. When 54 scholars were commissioned in 1611 to create the King James Bible, they were tasked with producing a brand new translation... but when they sat down to the work, they found they didn't need to reinvent the wheel. Tyndale’s cadence, vocabulary, and grasp of the original languages were so masterful that the committee found they simply could not improve upon his phrasing. They adopted his work as the backbone of their own. Modern computer analysis confirms that roughly 84% of the King James New Testament, and 76% of the Old Testament books Tyndale translated, are essentially Tyndale’s exact words. When you read the King James Bible, you are hearing the voice of William Tyndale. 🔥 He counted the Word worth dying for. Tyndale was betrayed, arrested, and imprisoned in a cold castle for over a year. On October 6, 1536, he was strangled and burned at the stake. His final recorded prayer was not for his own life, but for his enemies: “Lord, open the King of England’s eyes.” Within just a few years, English Bibles were being placed in churches throughout the realm. Tyndale died, but his work lived, and the Word of God went forth. By the providence of God, the work of one faithful man helped to put the Scriptures into the hands of millions upon millions of people for centuries.
35
474
1,278
18,956
It took 40 years of research to create Bitcoin
51
537
1,611
67,215
Brian Bartlett retweeted
HYPOTHETICALLY… IF I BOUGHT MY HOUSE FOR $125,000 IN 2002 AND THE COUNTY NOW SAYS IT’S WORTH $487,000, WHERE DID I ACTUALLY MAKE $362,000? Did I sell it? No. Did I receive $362,000? No. Did somebody hand me a check for the new assessed value? Obviously not. But my property taxes still go up because, on paper, my house is suddenly worth hundreds of thousands more. That’s the part that doesn’t make sense to me. This isn’t income. It isn’t cash sitting in my bank account. It’s a number someone assigned to my property, and now I’m being billed based on that number. If my stock portfolio doubles but I don’t sell, I haven’t turned that gain into cash. If my salary stays the same, I don’t suddenly owe more income tax because someone thinks I’m worth more. So why does owning a home work differently? WHY AM I PAYING TAX ON A GAIN I NEVER REALIZED? A house isn’t just an investment. It’s where people live. You can pay off the mortgage, own the property outright, and still face a bigger bill every year because the value of the house went up on paper. At some point, you have to ask what “owning” something actually means if the cost of keeping it can keep rising because of money you never received. THIS ISN’T ABOUT WHETHER THE HOUSE IS “WORTH” MORE. IT’S ABOUT BEING CHARGED FOR VALUE YOU NEVER TURNED INTO CASH. And people are starting to notice.
2,662
12,505
43,895
1,531,962
Brian Bartlett retweeted
Best Bitcoin commercial I’ve recently seen
Cortés
464
3,212
19,082
1,203,798
Brian Bartlett retweeted
🚨BREAKING: WOW!!! 🤯 Rep. Lauren Boebert just went full scorched-earth on Newsmax after seeing the unredacted Epstein files: She says it’s WAY darker than anyone imagined, torture emails, constant references to “consumption,” a place literally called “The Cannibal” restaurant, and code words like “jerky” and “human meat” being thrown around like it’s nothing. Yeah. She straight-up asked if we’re looking at cannibalism. Human fucking consumption. This isn’t some fringe theory anymore. A sitting Congresswoman is saying the quiet part out loud: these monsters weren’t just raping and trafficking kids, they may have been eating them. And the women? Ghislaine Maxwell, Rachel Chandler, and a whole network of female predators were neck-deep in moving children into this nightmare machine. This is not “elite pedophilia.” This is satanic-level depravity. This is ritualistic evil wearing suits and private jets. The files are so bad she’s warning us the public isn’t ready. Well guess what? We’re past ready. We’re fkn furious. No more redactions. No more “national security” excuses. No more protecting these flesh-eating demons. Release every page. Name every name. Burn their world to the ground. The American people deserve the truth, even if it makes us puke. Especially if it makes us puke. FOLLOW ME, THE NEXT DROP WILL BE SHOCKING.
151
1,268
2,917
64,459
Brian Bartlett retweeted
Bitcoin is going to win and totally dominate the entire global financial system. Want to know how I know this? It is the greatest form of COLLATERAL and the world runs on COLLATERAL. People still talk about collateral like the gold standard is a billion-dollar office tower. Cool. Now liquidate it. Call the broker. Hire the lawyers. Find a buyer. Negotiate for three months. Inspect the roof. Discover mold. Argue about zoning. Pray interest rates don’t move. Pray the buyer’s financing closes. And while everyone is signing PDFs, a hailstorm can literally attack your collateral. Real estate has location risk. Gold has transportation and custody risk. Fine art needs an appraiser. Private equity needs divine intervention. Bitcoin? Open phone. Press button. A globally traded bearer asset can move across the planet, settle without a title company, and be monetized at 2:47 AM on a Sunday without asking whether the county recorder’s office is open. No roof, pipes, floodplain, warehouse, truck. No “the appraisal came in light.” Just digitally native property connected to digitally native liquidity. That distinction gets more important as the credit system moves on-chain and collateral starts competing on liquidity, portability, divisibility, verifiability, settlement speed and durability instead of just historical familiarity. The great irony is that Bitcoin gets criticized for volatility while the financial system quietly discovers that almost everything else is an operational nightmare when you actually need to turn collateral into cash. A $100 million building is impressive. Until you need $100 million by tomorrow. Bitcoin is the first collateral asset designed for the speed of the internet. And we’re only beginning to understand what happens when an entire digital credit ecosystem gets built on top of it. Gold cannot compete with Bitcoin, and when you look at the objective monetary properties, it isn’t even close. Gold parity is a joke. We’re going way beyond that. bitcoin:native
43
88
764
19,355
Brian Bartlett retweeted
If I could give someone one piece of advice, it would be this: If you ever have the financial ability to do it, buy yourself one year of freedom. And before people come after me I know this isn’t realistic for everyone. This isn’t for the person who genuinely loves their career and wakes up excited to go to work. This is for everyone else. The people working 9–5, five or six days a week, spending more waking hours with coworkers than with their own family, doing something they don’t love simply because the bills have to get paid. If you can, save enough to cover one year of essential expenses, plus an emergency cushion. Then take the year off. No alarm because someone else needs you somewhere. No boss. No meetings. No lunch break telling you when you’re allowed to eat. No asking permission to take a Tuesday afternoon off. No forced conversations with people you wouldn’t choose to spend five minutes with. Just 365 days where your time belongs to you. Spend mornings with your family. Travel. Train. Read. Build something. Sit outside drinking coffee at 10 AM on a Wednesday. Figure out what the hell you actually want from the rest of your life. You might earn zero dollars that year. And it could still be one of the greatest investments you ever make. Because once you experience what it feels like to own your time, something changes. Going back to selling most of your waking hours just to survive becomes much harder to accept. And you’ll start looking for ways to make that freedom permanent. That’s the dangerous thing about freedom: Once you truly experience it, you’ll do almost anything to keep it. If you ever get the opportunity, take the year. And the earlier in life you can do it, the better. Money can be made again. Time cannot. Escape ⚡️
40
32
306
20,744
Brian Bartlett retweeted
“Bitcoin isn’t real. It’s just digital.” Okay. Let’s audit your life. Your credit score? An invented number maintained by three companies you never hired. Your bank balance? A database entry on someone else’s server. Your 401(k)? A digital account record held by a financial institution, with rules governing when and how you can access it. Your mortgage? A ledger entry tied to a legal claim on your house. Your airline miles? Digital tokens that can be devalued whenever the issuer changes the rules. Every card swipe is digital money. Every paycheck is digital money. Most of your financial life already exists as entries in databases. The real difference isn’t physical vs. digital. It’s who controls the ledger. Most of those systems are digital claims someone else can freeze, alter, dilute, or revoke. Bitcoin is different because you can hold the keys yourself. Learn why Bitcoin is so unique and why it's growing. It's built to improve your financial life.
29
143
562
18,962
Brian Bartlett retweeted
A federal court told Honda, Toyota, Volkswagen, and GM they can legally record and intercept your private texts and call logs the second you plug your phone into the car. The infotainment system downloads everything. You can’t see it. You can’t delete it. Police can. The judge said that’s not a privacy violation unless you prove it already damaged your reputation or your business. You paid tens of thousands of dollars for a rolling wiretap. This is the surveillance state on four wheels.
Orwell Day
686
8,429
15,901
528,623
The Little Tribe – Have Four to Six. Have four to six children. Not as a sacrifice. Not to fix a statistic. As the best project of your life – and the most radical one still available. 1. So that you have them to spend most of your life transmitting to. With one child, parenthood is a chapter. With six, it is the whole book. Thirty years of a full table and a full car, of stories told again and again – each time to a new face. Transmission stops being a lesson and becomes a whole life. 2. A little tribe – so they can stick together. Siblings are the first society. They argue, form alliances, betray each other over the last pancake and reconcile by dinner. Every parent of several knows the tribunal: "That’s not fair!" is the first cry of civilization. The child with five siblings learns early what a self-centered culture never teaches: you are not the center of the universe. And you are never alone in it. 3. A small society of civilizational resistance and development. The school has been captured. The media has been captured. Five siblings who grew up at the same table have not. Same stories, same jokes, same references – a shared language the system cannot edit. And cancellation depends on isolation – cut the target off from support, and the rest is easy. It is very hard to isolate someone with five siblings. 4. They can build together. Siblings start with the rarest capital there is: trust, earned over twenty years of shared bedrooms and shared secrets. The family firm is the oldest enterprise in the world for a reason – your best co-founder may be the one who knows all your weaknesses and shows up anyway. And excellence spreads in a family the way envy spreads in a committee: the younger ones chase the older ones, and the older ones cannot afford to slow down. 5. They can give each other courage. Fear works on individuals. It works much worse on tribes. One child who says the wrong thing at school is a problem. Five who say it are a family with an opinion. The family table is the first free-speech zone – the place where saying what you think is normal long before anyone explains that it is dangerous. Children raised there do not falsify their preferences easily. They have had too much practice being honest in company. 6. The objections. Too expensive – say the governments that take half your income and then explain that children are unaffordable. Rome did the same: the state removed the reason to have children, then legislated for babies. The career – almost nobody at eighty wishes for one child fewer. The planet – the Club of Rome said you were the problem, and the Club of Rome was wrong. For those who can – and not everyone can – the objections are mostly borrowed, usually from people with two children or none. 7. Maybe even a dynasty. Johann Sebastian Bach had twenty children; four of his sons became composers in their own right, and in one German town the musicians were simply called "the Bachs." The Adamses gave America a president, then a president, then an ambassador, then a historian. A dynasty is not money passed down. It is standards passed down. And a tribe carries the torch in more than one hand: one child is a thread, six are a rope. Values without numbers lose. So does liberty. Numbers are made at home. The long march needed a century to capture the institutions. A tribe needs one generation to become one. Tell the truth. Have courage. And build. A large family.
The Positive Program – What We Actually Build. The diagnosis is complete. The disease has been named – the long march, its toolkit, the captured institutions, the Gramscian pipeline running in every Western country simultaneously. The question that follows is the only one that matters: what do we actually do? Not in theory. In practice. The extractable lessons from the places where the counter-march is actually working. 1. Name the mechanisms. Before anything else – the vocabulary. You cannot fight what you cannot name. Cultural hegemony, elite capture, the ratchet, the Overton Window, preference falsification, lawfare, repressive tolerance – these are not academic terms. They are the names of the weapons being used against you. The person who has this vocabulary reads the news differently, recognizes the mechanism in the specific story, can name what is being done rather than simply feeling it. Naming is the first act of resistance. The preference falsification ends when enough people discover simultaneously that they are not alone. The naming accelerates the cascade. 2. Break the distribution monopoly. Musk’s lesson. The long march controlled the transmission mechanisms – the school, the university, the media, the platform. The counter-march must break the monopoly on distribution before anything else is possible. X did this – imperfectly, incompletely, under constant assault from the Counter-Reformation. But the printing press didn’t need to be perfect. It needed to exist. The alternative distribution channels – X, Substack, podcasts, independent media – are the infrastructure of the counter-march. Fund them. Use them. Defend them. The EU Digital Services Act, the advertiser boycotts, the regulatory assault are the Index of Forbidden Books applied to the platform that replaced the public square. Resist them as what they are. 3. Build the intellectual infrastructure first. Hayek’s lesson. You cannot skip the intellectual work and go straight to the politician. Someone must produce the ideas. Someone must translate them for millions. Someone must fund the institutions that do both for twenty years, including when the ideas are unfashionable. The think tank, the school, the formation pipeline, the organization that outlasts its founder – these are what convert a moment of attention into a durable transmission mechanism. The pipeline that produces Obama also produces Milei – when run in reverse. Build the pipeline. 4. Run the ratchet in reverse. Milei’s lesson. The ratchet clicks only one way – but only if you let it. Speed – act faster than the captured institutions can respond. Will – the absolute refusal to compromise with the consensus that produced the crisis. Preparation – the personnel, the plan, the intellectual infrastructure already in place before the political moment arrives. The first balanced budget in Argentina in over a century. Government ministries halved. Regulations abolished. The establishment that said it was impossible watched it happen. The ratchet is not a law of nature. It is a habit of the people who have been losing. Stop accepting it. Someone has to turn it. Milei did. 5. Capture the cultural layer. Gramsci’s lesson – applied in reverse. Culture precedes politics. The side that controls what is beautiful, what is admirable, what stories are told and how, controls what the next generation believes is possible. The right has been writing policy papers while the left has been making the films. Stop. Fund the artists who have something worth saying. Not propaganda – excellence. The standard the current system has abandoned. The film that is simply great and happens to reflect the values of life, freedom, and civilization. Beauty is not decoration. It is a civilizational argument. Make it. 6. Build the formation pipeline. The WEF’s lesson – applied in reverse. The Young Global Leaders program identifies people at thirty and forms them for decades. The counter-march needs the equivalent: the program that finds the next generation of civilizational builders, gives them the intellectual formation, connects them across borders, and sends them back into every institution. Not a secret network – a transparent one, everything the globalist project is not. The Council of Western Civilization. The formation school. The cross-border network of people who have been transmitted to and are committed to transmitting forward. 7. Have more children. Have four to six of them. So that you have them to spend most of your life transmitting to. A little tribe – so they can stick together, a small society of civilizational resistance and development. They can build together. They can give each other courage. They can transmit to each other what you transmitted to them. Maybe even a dynasty. The civilization that stops having children has already decided, at the most fundamental level, that the future is not worth bringing people into. Reverse this – not as a policy but as a personal civilizational act. The family is the smallest and most durable counter-institution available. It is where the first transmission happens – the values, the stories, the sense of what is worth admiring and fighting for. Every child born into a family that knows what it is and says so is a link in the chain the long march is trying to break. The large family is not a lifestyle choice. It is a civilizational statement. And possibly the most radical one available. 8. Transmit deliberately. Poland’s lesson – and the deepest one. The nation that disappeared from the map for a century and came back, not because it had an army or a state, but because the language was transmitted, the culture was transmitted, the sense of what it meant to be Polish was passed forward in the family, the underground school, the poem memorized in secret. The family came first. The nation followed – because a nation is nothing more than families who share a transmission, who pass forward the same stories, the same values, the same sense of what is worth defending and what is worth building. Start with the tribe you have built. The dinner table, the poem read aloud, the history explained, the book handed from parent to child, the conversation that continues across years until the child knows what they have inherited and why it matters. Then the tribe connects to other tribes – the school you chose (or built), the community you built, the network of families transmitting the same things in the same direction. And from there, the nation. Not the administrative state – the living nation, the people who know what they are and say so. The state can be taken. The transmission cannot be stopped if the people doing the transmitting refuse to stop. This is how civilizations survive. Not through governments or armies or institutions alone – but through the unbroken chain of people who received something worth passing forward, and passed it forward deliberately, to specific other people, one generation at a time. The torch changes hands or it doesn’t. The choice is always personal before it is political. Tell the truth. Have courage. And build. — The long march took a century. The counter-march will not – because the distribution revolution has compressed the timescale, because the managed reality is visibly failing, because the preference falsification is ending, because the proof of concept is running in Argentina and the question is being asked by US senators about Poland. The window is open. The tools exist. The vocabulary is spreading.
62
345
2,065
87,538
Brian Bartlett retweeted
The hospital found out Gail Seiler was unvaccinated for COVID. Then they tried to MURDER her. They STARVED her for 12 days, denied her water for 7 days, and told her husband she was going to die. When her husband came to take her home, the hospital made her a PRISONER. They called the police, and a 6-hour standoff followed. When the hospital finally let them go, it wasn’t through the main entrance. It was through the freight elevator used to carry bodies to the morgue. On the way out, a nurse told her husband, Brad, “Mark my words, she’ll be dead tonight, or before you even get home.” Gail survived. Not because of a miracle, but because a caring physician stepped in and guided her home treatment: nebulized budesonide and ivermectin. BRAD SEILER: “Over the next 30 days, she was weaned completely off of oxygen. Within 60 days, she had recovered sufficiently to return to work. Today, Gail is alive, healthy, active, and enjoying life with our grandchildren and children.” Gail’s story is horrendous, but it’s not uncommon. Hospitals were rewarded with perverse bonuses during COVID, and the more interventions they ran, the more they made. As Attorney @RenzTom previously testified: “We have incentivized the MURDER of patients rather than incentivize TREATMENT.” “When you go to the hospital, you get tested. They get paid more. When you get admitted for COVID, they get paid more. When they put you on remdesivir, they get paid more. When you get ventilated, they get paid more. When you die, they get paid more. This is perverse.”
1,344
25,507
62,539
1,199,122
Funny story— I just wrote a message to return with my JURY SUMMONS that just came in the mail today! "To whomever this may concern: After bearing witness to juror Michael Desronvil doxxed, ruthlessly attacked, exploited by the defendant's counsel, and incessantly harassed for the crime fulfilling his civic duty as the sole juror with moral obligations, I AM WITHHOLDING MYSELF FROM THE PROCESS. A system that allows such abuse to occur has forfeited the right to call subjugation to the harm a 'duty,' and I will not subject myself to such harm. Reach out again when there is no longer an unofficial penalty for voting on the side of morality when it is unfashionable. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Have a great day." No jury duty for me! 😂 Ok, so maybe it won't work, but at least my point will be made. God bless Michael Desronvil and his family!
578
1,690
8,370
271,516
Mothers: Stop Carrying the Domestic Load Alone Ladies, you need to stop carrying the entire domestic load alone. That is one of the things you have children for. Children can be taught to contribute to the household from a surprisingly young age. As they grow, their responsibilities should grow with them. If you teach them properly, much of the routine domestic work can gradually be transferred to them, leaving you primarily responsible for supervision, organization, and the work that genuinely requires an adult. The exact age will depend on the child, but a rough guide looks something like this: Ages 2–3 Put toys away Put dirty clothes in the hamper Carry unbreakable dishes to the table Wipe small spills Help put groceries away Match socks Ages 4–5 Make their bed Set and clear the table Feed pets Water plants Help sort laundry Dust low surfaces Help prepare simple foods Put their own clothes away Ages 6–8 Sweep floors Vacuum simple areas Fold laundry Empty small trash cans Load and unload parts of the dishwasher Prepare simple breakfasts and snacks Help wash dishes Keep their bedroom reasonably clean Help with basic yard work Ages 9–11 Do complete loads of laundry Load and unload the dishwasher Clean bathrooms Vacuum and mop Take out the trash Prepare simple meals Change bed linens Help care for younger siblings Perform more substantial yard work Help with grocery lists and putting food away Ages 12–14 Cook complete basic meals Handle their own laundry from beginning to end Clean the kitchen Clean bathrooms thoroughly Mop and vacuum the house Do routine lawn and garden work Babysit younger siblings for reasonable periods Help plan meals Help with household organization and errands Ages 15–17 Prepare family meals Handle most routine household cleaning Do grocery shopping when practical Manage their own clothing and belongings completely Perform substantial yard and maintenance work Care for younger siblings independently for appropriate periods Help manage household schedules and recurring tasks Learn basic repairs and maintenance Take responsibility for entire areas of the household By the time your children are teenagers, they should not merely be “helping Mom.” They should be competent members of the household who know how to see what needs doing and do it. The goal is not merely to reduce your workload. You are training future adults to run homes of their own.
Made with AI
21
76
733
72,519
Brian Bartlett retweeted
WHILE THE WORLD ARGUES, AMERICA PUT A CITY-SIZED ROCKET IN ORBIT At 7:48 this morning, while the rest of the planet was still arguing about tariffs and elections and whose fault everything is, a rocket taller than the Statue of Liberty lifted off a beach in South Texas and did something no rocket that size has ever done. It went to orbit and stayed there. That's Starship, on its fourteenth try. Thirteen times before this it flew and fell short, sometimes spectacularly, and thirteen times a certain kind of commentator declared the whole thing a billionaire's fireworks show. This morning it had an engine quit on the way up. The old way of doing things, the way of committees and cautious men, would have been to abort and study it for a year. Instead, the ship relit an engine it wasn't supposed to need, pushed itself the rest of the way to 17,500 miles an hour, and opened its doors. Out came twenty-six satellites, each one the size of a 737 when it unfolds. The company's own spokesman said the payload was worth about twenty Falcon 9 launches of bandwidth. Twenty flights' worth of internet, delivered in one morning, from one ship, and then the ship came home and splashed down in the Pacific in time for lunch. Here's what I keep coming back to. Nobody made the country do this. No five-year plan, no ministry of rockets. A bunch of engineers on a Texas beach decided the future should arrive sooner, and it did, and the rest of us got to watch it on our phones. That's not something that happens everywhere. It happens here. Every empire in history was built by whoever controlled the high ground. For a few thousand years that meant the hill above the river. Then the sea. Then the air. This morning, in the time it takes to eat breakfast, we reminded the world where the high ground is now, and who's standing on it. Argue about the rest of it. That's fine. That's what a free country does. But somebody put a city-sized rocket in orbit today, and it wasn't them.
101
665
2,753
39,613
Brian Bartlett retweeted
A surprising amount of people are bulltarded on Bitcoin but have never read the whitepaper, it's 9 pages Here is the TLDR for you The problem: every digital payment needs a middleman. The middleman can block you, reverse you, or debase you. The solution: a public ledger everyone holds a copy of, so no single party controls the record. The catch: who gets to write the next page? If writing is cheap, cheaters can spam fake history. The fix: make writing expensive. Miners burn real electricity to add each page. Rewriting old pages means redoing all that work, alone, faster than the entire network combined. Honesty becomes the profitable strategy. crazy to think satoshi airdropped 9 pages of straight sauce that solved a problem computer scientists had chased for decades
30
93
378
14,570
Brian Bartlett retweeted
Researchers proved AI has deleted every reason universities exist. Harvard University ran a controlled experiment pitting a custom AI against their own top-tier classrooms. And the results are going to collapse the higher education bubble. They took 194 undergraduates and split them up. One group learned physics in one of Harvard’s best hands-on, active-learning physical classrooms. Group work. Instructor support. The premium university experience. The other group went home and learned the exact same material with an AI tutor. The AI didn't just win. It embarrassed the institution. Students using the AI learned more than twice as much as the students in the elite Harvard classroom. They scored 30% higher on the final assessment. And they did it in less time. Let that sink in. A piece of software sitting on a laptop outperformed a world-class faculty in one of the most elite learning environments on Earth. Universities have always justified their exorbitant tuition with two things: access to elite knowledge and the physical classroom experience. This study just proved both of those moats are gone. When software can teach you complex physics twice as well as a $60,000-a-year institution, the math of higher education breaks permanently. The AI didn't just give the students answers. It used strict pedagogical guardrails. It guided. It questioned. It forced the students to do the cognitive work. It offered perfect, one-to-one tutoring, personalized to the exact moment a student misunderstood a concept. That level of attention is mathematically impossible to scale in a physical lecture hall. For a thousand years, the university was the only place to get a premium education. Now, it’s the bottleneck. If AI can double your learning speed for a fraction of the cost, what exactly are students taking on decades of debt to pay for?
1,082
3,091
14,395
1,253,480
Brian Bartlett retweeted
- 1913: "The income tax will only hit the top 1%." - 1935: "Social security numbers will never be used for identification." - 1971: "The gold suspension is temporary." - 2001: "These surveillance powers are only for terrorists." - 2020: "Two weeks to slow the spread." - 2026: "CBDCs will never be used to control spending." - You: "I'm noticing a pattern." - Government: "There's no pattern." - You: "That's what the pattern would say."
37
2,015
8,618
148,665