The Earth is a sphere, but you can’t push against nothing and still accelerate. The Soviets began this fraud with Gagarin, and bcs people tend to believe whatever they see on television, the U.S. felt compelled to respond, bcs it came down to an ideological war of systems.
4
37
That's not quite correct. Once again, NASA didn't invent physics. Newton's 3rd law, which you can demonstrate right at home, shows that you can indeed accelerate in a vacuum.
You aren't pushing against "nothing." You're pushing against the stream of particles coming out the back.
1
40
No, it does not accelerate at all. You can't push against a vacuum. As I showed this experiment at the beginning of the conversation, it shows it doesn’t work. We repeated it with blackpowder rocketmotors and liquid CO2 rocketmotors. No movement at all.
2
41
That is completely incorrect.
Once again, you can demonstrate these AT HOME.
In this setup below, what will happen to both the spring assembly and the 5N Mass when the spring is released?
1
2
51
So what? The bolt is released by the spring, hits the ball, and then the ball and the bolt push away from each other?
2
44
1. Setup: The rocket motor pushes against a container with atmosphere → movement occurs because F₁ = −F₂ with resistance (1 bar).
2. Setup: The rocket motor pushes against nothing → no movement, because F₁ = −F₂ with zero resistance (0 bar).
2
89
Yep, assuming that's a vacuum, your experiment shows rockets work in vacuum.
You were too afraid to answer. All we've done is replace the spring with a chemical that works like a spring.
Have some courage. Answer the question:
Correct. That's Newton's 3rd law, in a vacuum.
Let's replace the spring with an explosive instead, like a firearm.
What happens to the assembly and the mass.
1
1
54
Look, if you don't understand that the experiment just proved in front of your eyes that there was no movement when the rocketmotor pushed against the vacuum, what can I say? Right? There is just nothing more to say.
And your experiment with the spring is not the same setup.
3
43
Bcs as soon you have a spring pushing an object against another object, you have resistance. But there is nothing for the atoms to push against in a vacuum. There is no resistance. Resistance is 0 = no movement.
2
41
It’s like a bicycle hanging in the air while the rider pedals. The wheel spins, but there’s nothing for it to push against. Only when the wheel touches the ground is there resistance and motion according to Newton’s laws. In space, there are no roads and no walls to push against.
4
49
I know this is hard to understand. The problem is that we’re working with incomplete formulas. That’s why projects like ITER struggle: many physicists are excellent at mathematics but weak when it comes to conceptual understanding. They just don't get it, even if we show it.
3
38
Not all objects fall at the same speed in a vacuum. We have a huge problem understanding motion. Imagine noticing that stars in a galaxy move strangely, yet instead of revisiting Newton’s laws, they invented dark matter, which has never been proven. That is the lvl of stupidity.
4
36
That's incorrect. We'll get to that, but you need to stop being such a giant fucking pussy and answer the question.
This is now the 5th time you've tried to wiggle out of it.
Correct. That's Newton's 3rd law, in a vacuum.
Let's replace the spring with an explosive instead, like a firearm.
What happens to the assembly and the mass.
1
1
39
Your problem is that you can't process what you see, like in the experiment with the rocket motor in the vacuum. Here, you see an experiment in a vacuum-drop-tower. Objects fall with different speeds. It is a fact that they don't fall the same.
2
43
Two questions. You drop two balls of different mass from 2.5 m. Which one hits the ground first, the heavier, the lighter, or do both hit at the same time?
Now, you drop a cannonball and a football from 150 m. Which one hits the Earth first, or do both hit the same time?
2
41
But that’s fine. I know that not a single person in this chat can even grasp what I demonstrate with experiments. It’s okay to be ignorant and retarded. We go to Mars, you fools. No wonder you have comedians explaining your physics. Bcs its a joke... 😂🫡
2
46
Right, you're so confident that you keep having to run away like a scared lil' bitch.
8th time: Answer the question.
You didn't. You talked about vacuums, dropping balls, and rockets - none of which have to do with my question.
Answer the question. WHAT SPECIFIC MOTION will the cylinder and the ball exhibit when the explosion inside the assembly occurs?
x.com/CalmLogical/status/200…
1
2
53
I answered your questions! I demonstrated it with experiments.
Now answer my questions with the balls dropping.
If the object is physical, the explosion pushes against it, causing it to move. In this case, the law applies as F₁ = −F₂ with resistance (object).
It’s like a syringe releasing gas in a vacuum. The moment the gas hits a wall and starts equalizing, the syringe moves.
2
49
Good. you're confirming both objects move away from each other. That took you long enough.
Let's make the balls smaller. Now what?
Note that the mass of the balls is 5x the mass of the cylinder, although, I'm assuming you won't comprehend how that affects the motion.
1
1
109
I did. You asked if the red balls were physical objects. I said yes. The red balls are physical objects. All matter is physical.
Let's try a 2nd time. I'm assuming this next one will also take you 8 times to overcome your fear.
Good. you're confirming both objects move away from each other. That took you long enough.
Let's make the balls smaller. Now what?
Note that the mass of the balls is 5x the mass of the cylinder, although, I'm assuming you won't comprehend how that affects the motion.
1
56
Where did you answer my question? Which ball hits first, or do they hit the ground at the same time?
2
34
The demonstration has nothing to do with them hitting the ground. It has to do with them moving left or right. That's your answer.
Let's try a 3rd time. Will both the cylinder and balls move away from each other when the explosion expands in the chamber?
x.com/CalmLogical/status/200…
Good. you're confirming both objects move away from each other. That took you long enough.
Let's make the balls smaller. Now what?
Note that the mass of the balls is 5x the mass of the cylinder, although, I'm assuming you won't comprehend how that affects the motion.
1
1
31
The drop experiment is the 2nd law!!! Not the third!! Again, which ball hits the ground first from 2.5 m and from 150 m? Or do they hit the same time?
1
35
This isn't a drop experiment. This is a 3rd law experiment. The direction of the force is left and right. The assembly hangs from a string. You're trying to dodge.
Let's try a 4th time: Do both the balls and the assembly move away from each other when the explosion occurs? Yes or no?
1
2
55
Again: 2 questions. You drop two balls of different mass from 2.5 m. Which one hits the ground first, the heavier, the lighter, or do both hit at the same time?
Now, you drop a cannonball and a football from 150 m. Which one hits the Earth first, or do both hit the same time?
4
43
This has nothing to do with dropping balls. Stop running like a scared little bitch. You're trying EVERYTHING you can to avoid this because you're a dishonest fuck, and I'm loving every second of it. 🤣
5th time: Do both the balls and the assembly move away from each other when the explosion occurs? Yes or no?
1
2
39
So you can’t answer a question about the second law? Fine… whatever. You don’t know - fair enough.
3
42
To your question then.
In F₁ = −F₂, the syringe should react immediately because the suspension offers almost zero resistance in the horizontal setup. The formula doesn’t include a time factor, but it only moves once the gas hits the wall and equalizes.
4
55
Why would a wall be needed when we simply change a spring for an explosion to do the SAME task?
Even more curious is why you ADMITTED the cylinder would be pushed back and now you seem to have walked that back. Very dishonest.
You fully admitted the spring would push. Why won't pressure push?
1
2
45
Because the setup depends on the FACTOR RESISTANCE!
No Restistance = No Movement. Resistance = Movement.
Watch the experiment until you understand what you see.
4
63
Even more curious: Your dumbfuck picture has the balls whizzing away when they are FIVE TIMES the mass of the cylinder.
IT's too late. You already admitted the spring would push both away. from each other. Changing the spring for an explosion does the same work.
1
3
59
You're running again. The assembly is MASS. The balls are also MASS.
Explain why you arbitrarily decided the balls (5x more massive) would move and the cylinder (less massive) would stay still.
Explain it, smart guy.
Dec 25, 2025 · 12:16 PM UTC
2
2
68