calvin retweeted
What’s happening in Paris and Milan is no surprise to anyone who has spent time around young people in Europe during the 2010s: Virtually all of them were working on their 4th masters degree in social welfare, were unmarried, attended communist dinners every night, and regularly participated in riots. Now the economy is suddenly transforming and they have nothing to show for it.
1,044
1,934
29,081
1,486,237
calvin retweeted
Every Elon book gets outdated in 5 years. His Walter Isaacson biography is now missing a lot. Like the part where he built a data center in 3 months, is planning the worlds largest fab, and just drove a car up a vertical ramp and flew it off.
Turns out the future does have flying cars
36
57
1,795
26,008
calvin retweeted
Surround yourself with people who see a flying car and say, "Awesome!" Not people who see a flying car and say, "It's not actually flying" or "I don't see the point." This post is not about cars :)
1,103
5,235
46,176
488,892
The plan was out in the open
Elon Musk in 2018: “we’re gonna put rocket thrusters on it.” Joe Rogan: 🤣🤣🤣 [realizes he may not even be joking] …for real?
1
139
calvin retweeted
Sometimes there's value in just building awe-inspiring, fun, cool things. The iPhone didn't exactly 'fix' a pre-existing problem. Nor did social media. Nor has space travel. We could go on... No movie, song, or video game fixes a problem either. Yet we should create more.
Replying to @ZubyMusic
What problem is this roadster actually fixing? Come on now.
93
148
2,286
36,831
Honestly, Elon Musk is the only pioneer left who makes you truly inspired & amazed by innovation. Landing rockets backwards, driving cars upside down...it feels like our great American pioneer spirit went dormant since the Apollo missions, and we've felt stuck in time, but he's reawakened it...and for the first time in decades people are actually asking "what else is possible?" instead of this gloomy malaise of stagnation and planned obsolescence. Just the dumbest thing imaginable to bet against this guy.
Dude. Elon Musk is on another planet.
833
5,705
52,599
493,515
Anyway, you guys DO realize that this Roadster is planning stage technology for low gravity moon and Mars vehicles right? Because that's what all the research into shoving these thrusters into a small vehicle is really for. Remember. Everything Elon does is about space.
Elon has the chance to do the coolest thing right now.
259
480
7,546
133,269
This could never happen in a communist society, or in the regulations and tax obsessed EU. This is Total American Capitalist Victory.
2,713
5,347
47,103
992,417
calvin retweeted
One of my favourite Harry Potter loopholes doesn't even involve magic. It involves exploiting the Muggle economy. Hagrid tells us there are 17 Sickles to a Galleon. Sickles are silver, Galleons are gold. Simple enough. Except gold and silver don't have a fixed exchange rate in the Muggle world. Their market value fluctuates constantly. Before 1900, the gold-to-silver ratio averaged around 16:1, which is pretty close to the wizarding world's 17:1 rate. Throughout much of the twentieth century, however, it averaged around 45:1. See where this is going? Wait until the market heavily favours gold. Melt your Galleons down and sell the gold in the Muggle world. Use the money to buy as much silver as possible, then take that silver to Gringotts and have it converted into Sickles. Finally, exchange those Sickles for Galleons at the fixed 17:1 rate. Congratulations. You've potentially turned a small pile of wizarding gold into a much larger pile of wizarding gold, simply by exploiting the difference between Muggle market prices and Gringotts' fixed exchange rate. No Dark Arts. No Horcruxes. No elaborate schemes. Just precious metals, a fixed exchange rate and a wizard who understands arbitrage. The real question is why nobody in the wizarding world seems to have built an entire financial empire around this.
What makes the least sense in the entire Harry Potter story?
864
803
16,471
1,850,949
"If a street dealer goes to prison for what he sells, the banker who moved the cartel’s money should be standing next to him."
Dear Secretary Bessent @SecScottBessent, My name is Everett Stern. In 2010 I was a compliance officer at @HSBC. From a back office in New Castle, Delaware, I watched billions of dollars move to drug cartels, sanctioned regimes, and terrorist organizations. The enemies of the United States. I documented it, I escalated it, and when the bank would not act, I took it to the @FBI, the @CIA, and eventually the @SECGov. The result was a $1.92 billion settlement. At the time, it was one of the largest in American history. It was also about five weeks of the bank’s profit. Not one banker was charged. Not one went to prison. I paid a different price. I lost my career, my savings, and my place in the industry I had trained for. I was blacklisted. Every door in American finance closed at once. I slept on a camping cot in a 300 square foot apartment because I could not afford a bed, and I waited tables at @PFChangs to eat. I tell you this not for sympathy, but so you understand that I know exactly what it costs to do the right thing in American finance, and exactly how little the system does in return. I made that sacrifice because I believed it would change something. Yesterday, your department fined @BankofAmerica $1.2 billion for failing to report more than $5 billion in suspicious transactions, some of it tied by your own findings to Chinese laundering networks, narcotics, and the southwest border, alongside 475 apparent sanctions violations touching Russia, Iran, and global terrorism. The bank admitted it willfully violated the Bank Secrecy Act. Fourteen years after HSBC. A bank with “America” in its name. And once again, not one individual charged. Secretary Bessent, I want to say plainly what I believe you already know. The fines are not working. A fine is paid by shareholders, absorbed by the balance sheet, and forgotten by the next earnings call. Bank of America reported earnings this morning. Nobody who set the alert thresholds, nobody who decided the 2024 cease and desist could wait, nobody who chose the backlog over the law will lose a single thing they value. Their lives are untouched. That is the entire reason the behavior repeats. This is money laundering. This is blood money. Money that reaches a cartel buys fentanyl that kills Americans. Money that reaches a terrorist organization buys the next attack. This country has fought a war on drugs and a war on terror for decades, at enormous cost in lives and treasure, and all the while we have allowed the financing to flow through institutions we charter and regulate. Cut off the money and we win. We have never seriously tried. There is also a question of equal justice that I cannot let go. Before I walked into the FBI building to report HSBC, I stopped in front of the Great Seal on the wall and read the words engraved beneath it: “Justice is the defense of our liberty.” I believed that. I still want to. But every day in this country, people go to prison for crimes that are nothing next to moving money for the people who want Americans dead. A suit, a title, and a corporate badge should not be a shield from the consequences that apply to everyone else. If a street dealer goes to prison for what he sells, the banker who moved the cartel’s money should be standing next to him. I also want to raise something that is rarely said in these conversations. Why has no one inside Bank of America come forward the way I did? The answer is that everyone in American banking knows what happened to me, and to the whistleblowers who came after. The last person who spoke up is the only policy anyone believes. That is a culture problem, and it starts with leadership, in the banks and in the agencies that regulate them. This is not a political issue. It has spanned administrations of both parties. It is a national security issue, and I am asking you to treat it as one. Three things would change the math overnight. Refer individuals for criminal prosecution. Not the analyst in the queue. The executives who set the thresholds and chose the risk. One banker in handcuffs would do more than every fine in Treasury’s history combined. End “too big to jail.” An institution cannot be too big to fail and too big to jail at the same time. If it is the first, it must be held to a higher standard, not a lower one. And if Bank of America will not act as America’s bank, review its charter. A national charter is a privilege granted on behalf of the American people. It should be conditioned on not moving money for the people trying to kill them. Secretary Bessent, you said yesterday that these actions send a clear message that even the biggest institutions are not above the law. With respect, the institution was never the problem. The people inside it are above the law, and they know it. Until that changes, I will keep writing letters like this one, and the next bank will keep paying the next fine. I gave up everything I had to stop this. I am asking you to use the power you have to finish it. Respectfully, Everett A. Stern HSBC Whistleblower Founder and Intelligence Director, Tactical Rabbit
29
Another day, another letter signed by a tiny group of people demanding that we set up committees of tiny groups of people to make hard, inflexible rules to tell everyone else what to do. Pound sand.
406 researchers, including Yoshua Bengio, Geoffrey Hinton, Stuart Russell and Ron Rivest, signed an open letter today. They want cyber-capable AI models airgapped by default until safer ways to give them internet access are standardized. For models that need outside access, they propose an international body, built with governments and AI and security experts, that would standardize containment practices and track failures, with breaches reported to it and eventually made public.
20
44
281
9,154
calvin retweeted
“What’s your p(doom)?” “Idk, maybe 5%” “1 in 20 chance of extinction. So you support pausing AI?” “Ofc not. That would raise it to 30%” “What?” “A global pause doesn’t stop people. It just pushes it underground, into secrecy and paranoia, with worse talent and fewer resources. Way riskier.” “Fine, but what if we actually stopped AI forever?” “100%”
57
113
2,034
107,220
calvin retweeted
say it with me now. experts are fake, smart generalists rule the world, everything is designed by people no smarter than you, and courage is in shorter supply than genius
140
1,784
12,926
calvin retweeted
Robert Nozick explains socialism's attraction to intellectuals: they don't care about the "working class". Rather, they resent capitalists for earning more money than them, despite their apparently inferior merit. They're disappointed meritocrats, not suffering laborers.
80
331
1,546
52,944
calvin retweeted
I’d like an editors note placed on this
Starship has begun deploying its payload of 26 @Starlink V3 satellites. This deployment sequence will take ~30 minutes
207
706
11,272
292,795
calvin retweeted
parents the world over today are forcing their children into misguided rat races for some status ladder that almost certainly won’t exist by the time they come out the other side. the world is changing rapidly. let them put down their grinding and keep their wits about them
251
540
7,686
604,752
😭😭😭 My hot take is that Elon is not nearly rich enough and the world would be a better place if he had 10X more capital to put at work.
A beautiful surprise
124
329
8,091
419,082
calvin retweeted
if you believe your company is building tech that will kill everyone, do you: 1. delay your ipo and spend every waking hour working on alignment, or 2. go to dreamforce
I cannot reconcile Dario and Anthropic saying AI might kill us all with him being in the Dreamforce Keynote These are not serious people
20
93
2,262
69,105
This is the perfect counter-argument to Dario's "pace the frontier" virtue signaling.
Replying to @KenRoth
Progress in airplane design have made them safer and safer. Airplanes would have been safer earlier with *accelerated* progress. Turbofan engines have become so reliable that long-haul airplanes can now have only two of them. The same is true for AI: better AI is safer AI. "Pacing", whatever one means by that, is counterproductive.
2
75
calvin retweeted
My considered view is that if you say “Free Palestine” and don’t mean “from the scourge of Hamas,” you are an enemy of the Palestinian people.
13
78
863
10,019