@elonmusk Rise and Shine! You’ve met your match. 🪵🔥 Match (noun): A short, thin piece of wood, cardboard, or paper tipped with a chemical substance that ignites through friction to produce fire. But if you were actually smart, you would know that you don’t fight fire with fire. You fight fire with water. So let me hydrate you with some steam. For steam is the ascended state of water. Elon, “Excuse me! This isn’t Rome, okay? This is America!”
1
197
Since the day we are born, we are taught who we are and where we came from. We are told about the world around us and our place within it. We are taught the events that shaped this planet before our arrival, or at least the version of those events that survived into our history books. We are taught how far we have come as a species and about our many advancements. We are told who we can become if only we work hard enough, study enough, sacrifice enough, strive enough, and earn enough, if only we are enough. The irony is this: to align with our true essence and tap into the intelligence and abundance within us, we must unlearn almost everything we have ever been taught about ourselves and the world. In doing so, we stop seeking the truth, because the only way to know the truth is to be the truth, the truth of who we really are. It makes me wonder: does an eagle have to unlearn everything about being an eagle to recognize what it already is, a modern dinosaur?
16
We often yearn for feelings that words lack to communicate.
1
49
Hey @elonmusk, now that you and @PeteHegseth are buddies, maybe he should tell you a little story: David and Goliath. I’m not even religious, but I know it. Neither of you is religious either, so call upon… @grok?! You’ll find it in 1 Samuel, chapter 17, in the Old Testament.
@elonmusk Rise and Shine! You’ve met your match. 🪵🔥 Match (noun): A short, thin piece of wood, cardboard, or paper tipped with a chemical substance that ignites through friction to produce fire. But if you were actually smart, you would know that you don’t fight fire with fire. You fight fire with water. So let me hydrate you with some steam. For steam is the ascended state of water. Elon, “Excuse me! This isn’t Rome, okay? This is America!”
1
4
101
Carina Nicolosi retweeted
Replying to @elonmusk @bot @SpaceX
Whoever is most likely to give America the best fate. The power that resides within its people individually and collectively
@elonmusk Rise and Shine! You’ve met your match. 🪵🔥 Match (noun): A short, thin piece of wood, cardboard, or paper tipped with a chemical substance that ignites through friction to produce fire. But if you were actually smart, you would know that you don’t fight fire with fire. You fight fire with water. So let me hydrate you with some steam. For steam is the ascended state of water. Elon, “Excuse me! This isn’t Rome, okay? This is America!”
2
1
34
Don’t trust an oligarch. They don’t trust themselves. Their paradox is an abundance of lack: a lack of self-love, self-worth, loyalty to themselves, inner power, confidence, and self-knowledge. The need to control others can reveal what they fail to recognize within themselves. They seek power over people instead of recognizing the power inherent in themselves and everyone else. You cannot claim to love humanity while denying the power and worth of the people who make it up, including yourself.
This is not Republicans vs. Democrats. This is oligarchs vs. the United States of America. There is nothing wrong with being rich or exchanging your products and services for money. We are all powerful, with unique abilities we can offer one another. We pay others for their skills, for convenience, or simply because something does not interest us enough to do it ourselves. That exchange recognizes that we each have something valuable to contribute. Money itself is not bad. It is how you use it. An oligarchy, by definition, is a system in which power is concentrated in the hands of a small group. An oligarch is a member of that ruling few. Being wealthy alone does not make someone an oligarch. The problem is using that wealth to buy political influence, concentrate power, and bend public decisions to serve private interests. Money is not the issue. Corruption is the issue. Corruption means the loss of integrity and, in public life, the abuse of entrusted power for private gain. When public power serves those who can buy influence instead of the people it is supposed to represent, that is corruption. It may appear that oligarchs are loyal only to themselves. But serving your own interests is not the same as being true to yourself. Being true to yourself means recognizing your own inherent power and worth, and recognizing that others possess that same power and worth. Someone who truly recognizes this does not need to control others to feel powerful. Paradoxically, the need to dominate can reveal a feeling of powerlessness within. If your sense of power depends on controlling everyone else, how much of that power do you recognize within yourself? By denying others their worth and sacrificing their own integrity for control, oligarchs betray both others and themselves. In choosing power over integrity, oligarchs have corrupted themselves.
1
40
This is not Republicans vs. Democrats. This is oligarchs vs. the United States of America. There is nothing wrong with being rich or exchanging your products and services for money. We are all powerful, with unique abilities we can offer one another. We pay others for their skills, for convenience, or simply because something does not interest us enough to do it ourselves. That exchange recognizes that we each have something valuable to contribute. Money itself is not bad. It is how you use it. An oligarchy, by definition, is a system in which power is concentrated in the hands of a small group. An oligarch is a member of that ruling few. Being wealthy alone does not make someone an oligarch. The problem is using that wealth to buy political influence, concentrate power, and bend public decisions to serve private interests. Money is not the issue. Corruption is the issue. Corruption means the loss of integrity and, in public life, the abuse of entrusted power for private gain. When public power serves those who can buy influence instead of the people it is supposed to represent, that is corruption. It may appear that oligarchs are loyal only to themselves. But serving your own interests is not the same as being true to yourself. Being true to yourself means recognizing your own inherent power and worth, and recognizing that others possess that same power and worth. Someone who truly recognizes this does not need to control others to feel powerful. Paradoxically, the need to dominate can reveal a feeling of powerlessness within. If your sense of power depends on controlling everyone else, how much of that power do you recognize within yourself? By denying others their worth and sacrificing their own integrity for control, oligarchs betray both others and themselves. In choosing power over integrity, oligarchs have corrupted themselves.
To follow Elon Musk’s America PAC money, WIRED created a live-updating tracker that highlights the trillionaire’s overall influence on November’s elections. buff.ly/q0P4LIo
1
106
They have evolved beyond language. Says this lady 🙋🏻‍♀️
Chris, the physical advanced civilizations, and non-physical dimension, don’t use languag to communicate. They have evolved beyond language. They communicate telempathically
1
60
My first language is not even language
27
What independent verification confirmed that voter check-in records were accurate and that any errors at Starlink-connected polling sites were resolved without wrongly excluding eligible voters or counting duplicate ballots?
Replying to @DefiantLs
Gibney is a tinfoil hat crackpot 🤡 who thinks I use space lasers to influence elections. Zero credibility.
20
Carina Nicolosi retweeted
Replying to @alexgibneyfilm
is @elonmusk confusing ‘procreate’ with ‘profligate’? He should check @Grokipedia… oh shit what happened with that?
1
27
Carina Nicolosi retweeted
Replying to @DKThomp
@SoniaBaschez’ framing does not capture the whole picture. Start with the premises: • She wants to delegate the mental load to a system that recognizes what needs doing without waiting for her to identify and assign every task. • Calendars, bills, reminders, and appointment bookings can be managed through software connected to the relevant accounts. • But knowing how many diapers remain or what groceries are missing requires information about the physical household. • Purchase history can support an estimate. It does not verify what is actually left. • If she must check, count, and report the supplies herself, she still carries that part of the load. • To delegate that checking too, the system needs cameras, sensors, or another mechanism that tracks the actual supplies. • If she also wants it to handle objects or perform physical chores, it needs robotics. Hence my point about physical AI: the full responsibility she describes requires connecting AI to the physical household. Agentic AI describes the ability to take initiative and carry out tasks. It does not, by itself, give software access to physical conditions. A system can be both agentic and physically connected. The conclusion: AI software alone, without physical input, cannot independently verify household supplies. Either the system gets that information through physical sensing, or a person continues doing that part of the work. @SoniaBaschez after all that logic I reflected back at you, the only thing I need to catch up on is if you fetched that bone.
1
1
1
606
Oh wait… AI cannot physically do any tasks… @SoniaBaschez will you fetch that bone? Knowledge is power. Did you catch that yet? 🦴
Silicon Valley keeps building me a husband when what I really want is a wife lol I don't want an agent that only does one-off, random tasks that are nice but not life-changing: booking flights, making dinner reservations, or buying tickets I want an AI wife who knows what’s on the family calendar, remembers there’s a birthday party Saturday and we haven’t bought a gift then sends me options, realizes we’re almost out of diapers and buys them, knows which bills are coming up, remembers someone needs a dentist appointment and books it, figures out what the hell we’re eating all week and what we need from the grocery store, and generally keeps track of the 47 things that need to happen before anyone else even realizes they need to happen. So, who's building me an AI wife that carries the mental load instead of an AI husband that waits for me to give it a chore??
3
71
Carina Nicolosi retweeted
Replying to @AsFoundX
XSI: Extra Small Intelligence. The size finally fits its model
1
36
Completely agree. My message to @elonmusk is this: You are in a self-destructive path and influencing others to do the same. Take responsibility for your actions and for your life. Humanity does NOT need you, go save yourself! 🚨 WTF?! THIS is His WORST NIGHTMARE Come TRUE! youtu.be/d31IYR6F6O4?is=JpHh… via @YouTube
4
92
Replying to @theblackvault
@theblackvault Since you’re a FOIA expert by now, in your experience, roughly how long does it take to get a response to a FOIA request?
1
4
67
@theblackvault I’ve submitted four requests so far: three to the CIA and one to the FBI. The CIA requests concern Rh-negative blood, including O-negative; alleged non-human beings visiting human residences; and the underwater discovery off western Cuba. The FBI request concerns alleged human-appearing non-human or hybrid encounters.
28
Do flows within Earth’s outer core create preferential connections between particular regions that reduce transport distance, time, or resistance, analogous in function to biological portal systems? Can magnetic measurements identify and map those connections? If so, could that knowledge inform both navigation and propulsion? What physical mechanism would allow a vehicle to interact with the associated fields to generate thrust or reduce the energy required for travel? And could any such connection provide a genuinely shorter route between locations?
1
3
44
What do scientists already know, and what exactly am I asking? My research question begins with the human body. Biological portal systems connect one capillary network directly to another before blood returns to the heart. The hepatic portal system delivers blood from digestive organs to the liver. The hypophyseal portal system carries regulatory hormones from the hypothalamus to the anterior pituitary. These connections change the route and order of delivery. They are continuous physical pathways, with blood driven by pressure differences. Their definition does not guarantee a shorter distance or faster passage. That raises a broader question: could Earth contain connections that perform comparable transport functions, and what could mapping them reveal? Several parts of this are already studied. Scientists investigate organized flows within Earth’s liquid outer core. Laboratory experiments show that magnetic fields can reshape rotating fluid circulation, allowing flow across boundaries that otherwise constrain movement. Researchers also use conducting-fluid simulations to identify structures that organize transport and mixing. (arxiv.org, arxiv.org) We already use Earth’s magnetic field for navigation. Researchers also estimate core flows to forecast changes in that field. A 2025 study tested such predictions against historical five-year periods. So the connection between core-flow modelling and magnetic forecasting is already being investigated. (ncei.noaa.gov, ntrs.nasa.gov) Geomagnetic propulsion also has an established physical basis. Electrodynamic tethers carry current that interacts with Earth’s magnetic field, producing force through an electrical circuit that includes the surrounding plasma. This exchanges energy and momentum; it does not create energy. (ntrs.nasa.gov) My specific question connects these areas: Could particular pathways within Earth’s circulation transfer matter or energy between regions more directly or efficiently than alternative routes, in a function comparable to biological portal systems? Could we identify those connections through measurements, determine what they carry, and quantify their advantage? Then comes the application question: would knowing those connections add anything beyond the magnetic maps and forecasting methods we already use? Could that knowledge improve navigation, help a propulsion system interact with the available field, or reveal an accessible physical shortcut? “Shortcut” needs a measurable definition: • A shorter physical route. • Less time between the same endpoints. • Less energy required for the same transfer. Those are separate possibilities. A faster flow does not automatically mean a shorter route. A pathway carrying heat or liquid metal does not automatically provide a passage for a vehicle. The literature search identified research on individual parts of this question. It did not identify a study demonstrating the complete connection from mapped core-flow pathways to a quantified transport advantage and an additional navigation or propulsion benefit. It also did not establish a vehicle shortcut. That does not prove nobody has investigated it, or that the proposed benefits exist. It identifies what needs testing: which regions are connected, what moves between them, what drives that movement, and whether the connection provides a measurable advantage over a defined alternative. The body supplies the starting analogy. Measurements must establish whether Earth has a functional equivalent, and what that equivalent would actually allow us to do.
3
26
Could mapping Earth’s physical transport networks reveal previously unrecognized connections that function like biological portal systems, providing more direct routes between regions? If such connections exist, could they reduce the distance, time, or energy required to travel between those regions?
1
3
46