Started with a simple question about what a preconfirmation actually proves.
Ended up rebuilding the evidence model around it.
Now I want someone close to BAM to tell me where weโre wrong.
A preconfirmation isnโt an early receipt.
The useful difference is that it can be an attributable statement made before execution one you can later reconcile against the ledger.
We built a Breadlines evidence model around that distinction:
provider-observed โ validator-attested โ chain-proven.
And if a preconfirmed tx has no matching receipt, the answer is unresolved not automatically โbroken promise.โ
Now we want to test this against real BAM semantics.