This is a win. For the last few Christmases Dublin City Council deleted Christmas from their lights demonstrations and rebranded it Winter Lights instead. Due to public pressure they have u-turned. Our culture is important thesun.ie/travel/17671299/du…

Doctors are working in hospitals without garda vetting or overseas police clearance. You couldn't make this stuff up.

Two things about our health service should worry every patient and every family in this country. First, a HSE internal audit reported in today's Irish Independent found doctors working in our hospitals without garda vetting or overseas police clearance. Of 40 non-EU doctors checked across seven hospitals, six had no record of garda vetting. Overseas police clearance was missing or not up to standard in 11 cases. Only 27 had evidence of English-language competency. Just two of the seven hospitals were fully compliant. Second, if you ask how many allegations of sexual abuse and sexual harassment have been made against people working in our health service in the last five years, nobody seems to know. There is no single HSE figure. Cases are dealt with one at a time, spread across regions and services, and the full picture is never put in front of the public. Both point to the same problem. Basic safeguards are not being applied consistently, and when things go wrong the HSE does not keep proper track of it. We have already seen vulnerable people in disability services and nursing homes failed while warning signs were handled in isolation. Every volunteer coaching an under-10s team has to be vetted. Patients are entitled to the same assurance from the people caring for them. The vast majority of doctors, nurses and staff in our health service are decent and dedicated, including the many overseas doctors we badly need. They deserve a system that does its job properly. So do the patients who trust it. You cannot fix what you refuse to check and refuse to count. I will be pushing for full transparency on both.

Good morning ladies and gentlemen. Listen to this lady who phoned in to talk tv to say what we are all thinking. Bravo 👏

The vast majority of Irish people are unaware of what the traitorous anti-Irish govt has signed every Irish man, woman & child up to. The govt-funded Irish MSM won't report on this sinister & totalitarian United Nations Pact for the Future globalist Agenda. #WakeUp⚠️👇👇

Saturdays Hunter Moon symbolises abundance and offers opportunities for greater emotional clarity and balance, relieving relational tensions by adjusting reactions, and a push toward more evolved, compassionate ways of relating. Pray for peace All of us Keep praying For Peace

the waxing gibbous moon tonight sits brightly in my northern sky my large once small tree soaring and waving on high at first I said, why! she is smiling gaily for us then, I looked again and she was praying in God's light praying that we may see the light of peace for we

The BOND APOCALYPSE is happening

Ukrainians were asking for talks a WEEK after start of Special Military Operation — Russian FM Lavrov at UN But 'Boris Johnson BANNED Ukrainians from concluding legally binding document' 'If that initialed agreement had been implemented, Ukraine would have maintained 1991 borders, without Crimea and part of Donbass'

BREAKING: The US is seeking to join Elon Musk’s court fight over the EU’s €120 million fine on X. The Trump administration has applied to support X’s challenge, arguing that the European Commission overstepped its authority. Washington is now standing with Musk. 🔥

So not only do you (as a migrant) get rewarded with citizenship but you essentially, for all intents and purposes, have your criminal record exponged, enabling you to clear criminal background checks to work with vulnerable children, elderly etc. No matter what you have done in your past. Meanwhile a native persons criminal record (for lets say not paying the annual RTE Ministry of Truth fee) can and will be used and held against you. At every available opportunity. Yet they say you aren't being treated like a second class citizen in your own homeland. independent.ie/county/monagh…

Abort the young, euthanise the elderly, export our best & brightest, make it impossible for Irish people to buy a home and start a family, and import the third world en masse to replace them. And if you think of speaking out, a multi-billion€ NGO industry will call you racist.

Govt slammed as 70% of young Irish adults are now considering leaving Ireland for a better quality of life. We are exporting our best and importing the worst. theliberal.ie/govt-slammed-a…

The TRUTH IS 1. Foss-fuel combustion does NOT drive CO2 growth 2. CO2 is the gas of life 3. CO2 is good for the planet 4. CO2 is good for human beings 5. CO2 does NOT cause any "warming," which itself is a FICTIONAL concept. That's it.

The Aontú Bill to exit from the EU Migration Pact passed first stage in the Dáil today. #aontu #immigration

Aontú PQ shows that more than €2m was spent by the government on security at just 2 closed asylum accommodation centres. The government refused to provide details for the other 300 IPAS centres. independent.ie/irish-news/mo…

Why we KNOW fossil fuels played a completely negligible role in the rise of atmospheric CO₂ in plain English 1. Carbon has a fingerprint. Carbon atoms come in two stable kinds. One is a little heavier than the other. Every source of carbon on Earth has its own mix of heavy and light atoms, and scientists measure that mix as a single number. Think of it as a fingerprint. Coal, oil, and gas have a fingerprint of minus 28. Carbon dioxide bubbling out of the ocean has a fingerprint of minus 8. Volcanoes are minus 5. Dissolving limestone is 0. A lower number means lighter carbon. These fingerprints are measured facts, and the IPCC uses the same numbers. 2. You can read the fingerprint of whatever is being added to the air. When carbon is added to the atmosphere, the atmosphere's fingerprint drifts toward the fingerprint of what was added. In 1958 Charles Keeling showed a simple way to read off the fingerprint of the added carbon directly from the air measurements. It is a graph. Plot the air's fingerprint against the amount of CO₂ in the air in a certain way and you get a straight line. Where that line meets the edge of the graph is the fingerprint of the net addition. This is not a computer model. It is bookkeeping. You count the heavy atoms, you count the light atoms, and the answer follows. Nothing about oceans, forests, or weather goes into it. 3. The fingerprint of the added carbon is minus 13. Koutsoyiannis (2024) did this with the four Scripps monitoring stations in Alaska, California, Hawaii, and the South Pole, using records from about 1978 to today. Every station gives the same answer: minus 13.2, give or take 0.2. These are the same records the IPCC relies on. Two completely separate measurements say the same thing. A Caribbean sponge that grows in yearly layers, like tree rings, records ocean carbon back to about the year 1500. Its fingerprint is about minus 13 for all five centuries, with no drift. Air trapped in Antarctic ice at Law Dome, analyzed by Köhler et al. (2006), also gives minus 13. Three different materials, three different laboratories, five hundred years, one number. 4. Simple mixing math sets the range from the modern data alone. Every carbon atom added to the air came either from fossil-fuel combustion or from some non-fossil-fuel source: the ocean, volcanoes, rock weathering, plants and soil. The fingerprint of the mix tells you how much came from each. It works like mixing paint. If you mix black and white and get a very light gray, you know there was very little black. Fossil-fuel carbon is the black, at minus 28. The ocean is the white, at minus 8. The measured mix is minus 13, much closer to the ocean than to fossil fuel. The modern record from 1978 to today does not by itself pin down the exact fingerprint of the non-fossil-fuel carbon. It could be anywhere from minus 8 (pure ocean) down to minus 13 (matching the mix exactly). Run the mixing math across that whole range and the fossil-fuel share comes out somewhere between zero and 26 percent. That is what we know from the modern data alone: not more than 26 percent, possibly zero. The exact answer comes in step 6. 5. The official claim is impossible under any assumption. The IPCC, NASA, NOAA, EPA, and Engelbeen, Hannon, and Burton (2024) say fossil-fuel combustion caused essentially all of the rise. That is close to 100 percent. "Dominant" by any normal meaning is at least 80 percent. Run the mixing math backwards and ask what the non-fossil-fuel carbon would have to look like for each of those claims to be true: - For fossil fuel to be even a bare 50 percent, the non-fossil-fuel carbon would need a fingerprint of plus 1.6. No carbon source on Earth is that heavy. - For 80 percent, it would need a fingerprint of plus 46. That is more than 20 times heavier than the heaviest source that exists. - For 90 percent, it would need plus 120, about 60 times heavier than anything on Earth. - For 100 percent, it would need to be infinitely heavy. The official claims do not fall a little short. They require carbon sources that do not exist. 6. Five hundred years of no change gives the exact answer: essentially ZERO (0% fossil-fuel sources). The modern data left one unknown: the fingerprint of the non-fossil-fuel carbon. The sponge and ice-core records supply it. In the year 1500 there was essentially no fossil-fuel burning, so the fingerprint of the added carbon then, minus 13, came entirely from non-fossil-fuel sources. That fixes the unknown at minus 13. Since 1500, fossil-fuel burning has grown about ten thousand times over. If fossil-fuel carbon were any real part of the added carbon, the fingerprint would have slid toward minus 28 as burning grew. It did not move. It is still minus 13 today. Put minus 13 for the non-fossil-fuel carbon and minus 13.2 for the modern mix into the mixing math and fossil fuel's share of the added carbon comes out at about 1 percent, which is zero within the measurement error. The range of zero to 26 percent from step 4 collapses to a single answer: essentially zero. 7. Why this is knowledge, not opinion. The conclusion rests on three things only: - counting atoms, - the standard measured fingerprints of fossil-fuel carbon and the other sources, and - the Scripps, sponge, and ice-core records. The IPCC uses all three. Anyone who accepts all three and rejects the conclusion is refusing to do arithmetic. The only way out is to throw away one of the three, and each one is a foundation of the IPCC's own work, and nobody has done so anywhere in the peer-reviewed literature. 8. What is actually happening. Burning fossil fuel does put CO₂ into the air. That is measured at the smokestack. But a CO₂ molecule stays in the air only about four years on average before the ocean or plants take it back. So fossil-fuel CO₂ never piles up. Add up all fossil-fuel emissions since 1850 with that four-year turnover and only about 4 percent of the carbon in today's air came from fossil fuel. The growth in atmospheric CO₂ since the industrial revolution came from non-fossil-fuel sources. Fossil fuel's share of that growth is essentially zero.

The Aontú Bill to exit from the EU Migration Pact passed first stage in the Dáil today.

BREAKING: IRAN PRESIDENT PEZESHKIAN AT UNGA SAYS ISRAEL HAS NUCLEAR WEAPONS BUT INSPECTORS WANT TO COME TO IRAN INSTEAD “Atomic and nuclear bombs are in the hands of the Israeli regime, but the inspectors are requested to come to Iran. Israel has murdered savagely over 70,000 innocents in Gaza, but Iran, while behind the table of negotiation, was bombed. Israel has the bombs, has weapons of mass destruction, is not a member of the Non-Proliferation Treaty, during her shameful life has not allowed a single inspection, but they are rewarded by all the means necessary for them to be able to bomb any capital in the region at will.”

This is worth a few minutes of your time.