THE GOVERNMENT PUBLISHED THE RORT ON ITS OWN WEBSITE
There's a page on the Department of Home Affairs site about a program called Supporting Multicultural Communities. Anyone can read it.
Here is what it says, word for word.
The Australian Government is investing up to $171.3 million over 3 years from 2025-26. This is in line with the 2025 election commitments. The program will be delivered through multiple closed non-competitive and one-off ad hoc grant rounds.
Read that again. Closed. Non-competitive.
You cannot apply unless the government invites you. And one-off ad hoc, which under the Commonwealth's own grant rules is the category usually decided by a minister.
What the page does not say, anywhere, is how an organisation gets onto that invitation list.
Now put it next to what I wrote a fortnight ago.
The Major and Local Community Infrastructure Program was $560.9 million. Invitation-only. Non-competitive. Election commitments. More than 220 organisations invited. The department's own page says only organisations identified by the Australian Government will be invited, and when Parliament asked who did the identifying, the answer was that they had been identified by government.
Where it went: 73.2 per cent, $409.1 million, to divisions notionally held by Labor. 22.6 per cent to Coalition divisions. Forty-five electoral divisions received nothing.
Two departments. Two programs. Same year. Same mechanism. Three quarters of a billion dollars between them, handed to people who were asked, by a process nobody outside the building can see.
The steelman is genuine and I'll put it properly.
Election commitments are made publicly during a campaign, voters know what was promised, and a targeted round is simpler than an open competition for money already promised to a named organisation. The 2024 grant rules expressly permit closed, non-competitive programs. And this department runs open rounds too. Its Infrastructure for Multicultural Communities program puts $41.6 million through published guidelines and two application batches anyone eligible can enter.
So this isn't a department that only does closed rounds. It's a department that does closed rounds for election commitments.
And those same grant rules say better practice for a closed non-competitive process is to either name the eligible applicants or publish how eligibility was determined. Neither happened here.
Fine. Then publish the list of who was invited, and why.
Because right now the answer to how three quarters of a billion dollars was allocated is that somebody decided, and you're not allowed to know who or on what basis.
Cold Hard Facts. Corrected when wrong. No misinformation.
What's your thoughts…?
Peter Lyndon-James 🇦🇺
Sources:
Department of Home Affairs, Supporting Multicultural Communities Program page, and Infrastructure for Multicultural Communities page. Commonwealth Grants Rules and Principles 2024, paragraph 11.3. Centre for Public Integrity, Public money, political advantage?, September 2026.