Years ago, I sued a company for false advertising of “sustainable seafood.”
Their suppliers had been recently held liable for threatening endangered whales, in violation of federal law.
In the complaint, we also detailed how they sourced shrimp from farms that crushed the eyes of the shrimp in order to increase their reproduction (standard practice in the industry).
One of the extremely normal corporate lawyers representing the company told me that she cried while reading our complaint and stopped eating shrimp after that.
I, of course, get the absurdity of caring about shrimp welfare in the abstract, but I think most people recoil when they hear about the actual details.
The simple fact is that so many of the cruel things we do to animals in agriculture, including shrimp, could be so easily avoided.
I have no idea how much it hurts a shrimp to crush their eyestalks, but what would mean so little to us could mean so much to them. I think most people, if given the choice, would like the world to be a little kinder to animals in all their forms.
I don’t think that’s anything to be ashamed of.
Shrimp welfare is one of many EA issues people reflexively mock but 99% of people actually agree with on the merits
"Should fishermen electrically stun shrimp before boiling them alive?"
"Uh that seems reasonable" --Normie Mc MedianVoter