And for more on the genetics of skeletal evolution, check out the wonderful recent work from the Capellini
lab lead by Alexander Okamoto pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4211…
Co-led with the wonderful @TakaInoue5 , and spearheaded by the super talented Yizhi Yan (experiments) and
@nadavmishol
(analyses), together with a fantastic team of collaborators.
This leaves some fascinating questions: why would such a costly change evolve instead of being purged? Was there an evolutionary trade-off? And what did this shift do in other organs where GAGs are important (brain, skin)?
Our results suggest that all humans begin from a GAG-poor baseline that predisposes our joints to degeneration, on top of which aging, injury, and other risk factors act.
This has a striking connection to disease. GAG loss is a hallmark of degenerative joint diseases, which are unusually common in humans. Remarkably, the evolutionary reduction we find is ~2x larger than the GAG depletion measured between diseased and healthy humans.
So we measured them in tissue: 139 cartilage samples from 42 humans and 7 great apes, across 8 joint types. The result was surprising: human cartilage has lost ~2/3 of its GAG content.
Why GAGs matter: after collagen, they are the most abundant biomolecule in cartilage. Their dense negative charge draws in water, giving joints their compressive resilience. They are also key regulators of skeletal development.
Both methods converged on the same signal: extensive rewiring of our extracellular matrix, and specifically a coordinated suppression of glycosaminoglycan (GAG) biosynthesis, carrying strong signatures of selection.
The hybrids tell us which genes changed. The MPRA tells us which variants cause it. Together, they turn 0.6M noncoding changes into a functional atlas of human regulatory evolution.
Why make human–chimp hybrid cells? Gene expression differs for many reasons. But, in a hybrid cell, the human and chimp share one nucleus and one cellular environment. Any difference between the alleles is therefore genetic.
We combined two powerful approaches: human–ape hybrid cells, and a systematic functional screen of all ~0.6M human-specific variants. Together, they let us study human evolution from both sides: gene expression and the DNA changes driving it.
Humans are far more prone to degenerative skeletal diseases than other apes. Our new @Nature paper uncovers the genetic changes that shaped our skeleton and uncovers a major clue to why it is so vulnerable to degeneration.🧵👇
nature.com/articles/s41586-0…
Our approach was based on gene regulatory phenotyping, which predicts the direction, rather than magnitude, of phenotypic difference - a much more attainable goal. If you're interested in why and how this approach works, see: nature.com/articles/s41467-0…
Overall, we suggest that substantially more phenotypic information can be inferred from genetic data than previously appreciated @GiliGreenbaum@ShaiCarmi and Keith Harris
Importantly, unlike quantitative phenotypic predictions (e.g., based on polygenic scores), we show that our qualitative approach circumvents one of the biggest problems in population genetics – the limited transferability of genotype-phenotype association data across populations