I am quoting this little exchange, because this is a perfect representation of those who continue to carry water for the corrupt, criminal, Trump Administration, in this country.
They misrepresent the law, facts, realities, as if being clever; if your argument hinges on someone accepting your misrepresentation as fact, you haven’t won any argument. It’s an admission, from the outset, that you’re wrong.
Then, it’s into straw man arguments; shifting to some other nonsense - “Carney is lying”, because the victim-class claims as much (baldly), and a criminal-fraudster, POTUS, has scraped social media, echoing said delusions.
If our Government ever does release documents, as demanded by these folks, everyone should worry; it means it’s done and over with, and there will never be a new deal with this Administration (we’ll just have the one in place for the next 10 yrs. that Trump unlawfully breaches at his whim).
You literally went on CBC and equivocated “free trade” with “trade”, trying to argue that the restriction on “trade” has always been there.
Now, you’re the one being shifty, saying they’re liars and your point is that you need to see the text?
But, you went on TV and said it didn’t matter. It was always there, already, in CUSMA.
So, which is it? That “trade” is the same as “free trade”?
or
That you hate our Govt. so much (prefer doing the bidding of a corrupt, criminal-fraudster), you would prejudice Canadian interests, to see documents, drafts exchanged, during confidential negotiations (as if you and anyone else demand as much, are more important than our collective interests)?
I am genuinely curious.