Hi Paul! :D
Here's you (the very unbiased Forbes man, of course) TAKING ISSUE with two studios (one of which literally just 5 independent dudes making a game) before the games are even out because you personally disagreed with shit that has nothing to do with the games:
For LOTF2 it was because an article covered that the CEO said the game would have attractive female character designs as an answer to player's question. You called him a loser :D very unbiased.
And for Knight's Path because a Fantasy RPG set in a Medieval Europe inspired setting has a male-only option for the character creation as if that shit was a weird, unnatural choice that is somehow wrong.
Then saying nothing when 1348 Ex Voto released with no character options at all, just stuck playing a female knight (in not even fantasy but an actual medieval Italy setting) Clearly very unbiased mentality there as well.
These are just two recent examples and it doesn't even go into the myriad of opinion pieces that don't do shit in separating Forbes from the rest of biased Games Media even if your outlet is in general more professional about it instead of a complete shit show like for example TheGamer.
This is kind of fascinating. Forbes is ranked as "biased" and "not trusted" because we rank games too...high, I guess? (I didn't write the vast majority of reviews tracked).
It may be useful to gauge critic scores against user scores (though again, there's certainly an industry review bombing problem), though disagreements being labeled "biased" or "untrustworthy" ironically seem like a very biased way to frame this