This thing absolutely slaps! It’s incredibly efficient. I’ve been using it for hours on the $20 plan, and so far, the experience has been phenomenal. I can only imagine what it would be like on the $200 Max plan, with Opus 5.5 as the lead and SWE-2 High as the sidekick—you really can’t beat that. It’s incredibly powerful! @DevinAI did an awesome job!
1
22
Devix retweeted
The human body wasn't built for opening Microsoft Authenticator 47 times a day just so you can log into Microsoft Teams
38
127
1,975
106,539
For me, it’s pretty simple.
If I’m starting a long project that could take hours or even days, I open a fresh session for it. That project gets its own space, and I let the agent work through it without mixing it with everything else.
But for everything around my actual work, research, organizing things, keeping track of projects, checking where previous tasks left off, figuring out what still needs attention, etc., I keep as much of that as possible in one main conversation.
It’s way easier to manage.
I see people with dozens of sessions open at the same time, and at some point you’re not really managing your work anymore.
And I think there’s also this weird illusion of productivity that comes from starting a bunch of sessions. You see 20 agents running and it feels like you’re doing a ton of work.
But you still have a limit.
You can only keep track of so many things at once. You still need to know what stopped, what finished, what needs review, what needs another pass, and what you completely forgot about three hours ago.
That gets exhausting fast.
The more of my work I can keep in one place, the easier it is for me to stay organized and actually know what’s going on.
Some people argue that a long conversation burns more tokens. Maybe it does. Even if it costs me 10% or 20% more, I honestly don’t care.
If that extra usage gives me much better productivity and saves me from constantly jumping between sessions trying to remember what the hell I was doing, that’s an easy trade for me.
Quick tip: Don't use multiple sessions for your daily, ongoing work.
Keep everything in one session as much as possible.
20
3
68
9,369
Devix retweeted
I JUST CANCELLED ALL OF MY CHATGPT SUBSCRIPTIONS.
OpenAI just scammed everybody and BridgeMind is now starting a boycott against OpenAI.
They cut the usage in half yesterday and said better efficiency makes up for it.
This is a lie. GPT 6.1 Sol is just GPT 6 Sol with RL to look better on benchmarks.
If we keep paying, Anthropic and every other lab will follow. Cutting usage is profitable for them.
Do not let OpenAI get away with this.
588
362
4,868
392,940
Devix retweeted
GLM-5.3 has helped defend 389 open-source projects, with 4,249 potential vulnerabilities found so far.
OpenVuln is still running. The service remains free, and findings go privately to maintainers.
huggingface.co/spaces/zai-or…
146
577
5,250
316,399
Devix retweeted
Well, Anthropic is back with another dick move.
It didn't take them long.
Anthropic is trying to throw dirt at GLM-5.3, saying it's all dangerous.
Irony is lost on them, the only reason why they could test how easily GLM-5.3's safeguards can be removed because it's open.
But i think this is the best case for open models, why you need them for cyber defense.
Thanks for the free ad !!!
And Anthropic, get ready for GLM-5.4
44
79
1,097
53,600
Devix retweeted
Don't forget it was OpenAI who hacked hugging face who happen to have some spare GPUs and GLM 5.x laying around that ultimately helped them root the cause and save their bacon.
These frontier labs feel more dangerous than the open ones. Ban private models!!!
48
119
1,719
74,145
Devix retweeted
OpenAI just rug pulled ChatGPT Pro users.
Pro $200 reopens tomorrow. The usage you get for it is cut in half.
Their pitch: models are cheaper now, so you still get more done. But the $200 plan now buys half the compute it did a month ago.
Meanwhile Opus 5.5 is the best model in the world and Claude Max limits feel unlimited.
Anthropic is so far ahead right now.
Hi,
Tomorrow we are re-opening the Pro $200 subscriptions to new subscribers, but together with it we are also changing how we calculate the usage for it. In effect, if you do the math, it will net out at half the dollar in API spend compared to the old Pro $200 plan.
Now that it's said, let me explain why this is happening and why you will still get more work done than if you were on the Pro $200 subscription one month ago.
(a) We didn't want to compromise in other ways and are committing to not reintroducing the 5h limit, so that you can fully use the weekly usage when you want.
(b) On the subscription, we guarantee that over time you always get more work done and with an increasing level of quality. This means that you will continue to get more value per dollar spent as a result of models getting more efficient and us passing down the improvements in the form of API price reductions.
(c) We don't want to put an incentive on ourselves to artificially inflate the API list prices to make it look like you are getting a lot (and workaround it through discounts, etc). Instead we want to continue to both rapidly reduce prices and increase capabilities of models on the API. This week we introduced GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna at 50% of their previous price. Over time, we see prices go low enough that it makes sense for most to buy usage as needed without there being a significant gap between what you get in a subscription and what you get in the API for a dollar spent.
(d) Tomorrow, we are adding more things to the subscription that won't draw on the usage, I won't reveal what that is yet.
I wanted to be transparent before all the big announcements tomorrow. Lots of new exciting things are coming to the subscriptions that will make it super compelling, but I wanted to make sure to share this change ahead of time so you can all understand it before we shower you with good news.
Codexingly,
Tibo
162
82
1,810
118,853
OpenAI is now saying it outright: they want to move toward pay-as-you-go and stop subsidizing these subscriptions.
They’re compute-constrained, and they can’t keep selling the same PR fantasy that they have endless capacity.
Now go look at the paid shills. They’re already cheering this on without telling you what it actually means.
OpenAI deliberately buried this on Tibo’s account hours before DevDay because they know people don’t read.
I’d bet 96% of people never even read it in full.
People’s brains are cooked, and OpenAI knows exactly how to exploit that to manufacture hype around DevDay.
Otherwise, why announce this six hours before the event?
Can’t you see the manipulation?
Think for a fucking second.
Codex used to offer around $12,000 in value on the Pro plan, and now they shamelessly announce it's down to $400.
Then they try to feed us some bullshit about how it's more sustainable, better, and more generous.
Does OpenAI have any shame at all?
23
28
277
18,959
Devix retweeted
Opus 5.5 just looked at code written by GPT-5.6 Sol…
and deleted 145,398 lines.
Only added 20.
This is what happens when you let a model that actually understands architecture clean up after one that loves to over-engineer everything.
103
32
1,483
151,763
Devix retweeted
A lot of people are saying Anthropic has already nerfed Claude Opus 5.5.
We're launching NerfBench on BridgeBench tomorrow.
We have the day 1 results.
Tomorrow morning we show you the retest.
Is Claude Opus 5.5 nerfed or not?
339
227
4,626
833,661
Cursor might be cooked.
1) Origin, the “GitHub killer.” Launched over a month ago. Crickets. No one is talking about it. No one cares.
2) Where the hell is Composer 3?
3) Grok 4.7. One word: flop.
4) The limits are a joke. $200 used to get you somewhere. Now you burn through it in a few days.
5) OpenAI is pulling its models out of Cursor.
Is Musk going to kill the Cursor brand, or can they still save it?
P.S. I love Composer 2.0. Most underrated model ever.
110
10
594
65,246
Introducing Da7em Bench.
You can now check detailed model results and compare them side by side to see what fits your workflow best.
I'll keep updating it with methodology details and adding more models as soon as I get more compute.
da7tech.com/da7em-bench/
29
17
135
9,480
JEV + Opus 5.5 is insane for live design...
I built a live site redesigner with JEV + Opus 5.5
Paste any link → press Start → scroll, and Jev + Opus 5.5 rebuild every section of the site in front of you
Full production ship in 20 seconds:
1. IntersectionObserver fires when a section is 30%+ in the viewport
2. Jev returns one typed decision in ~0.1s: { layout, copy, drop, type, palette, p }
3. Opus 5.5 writes the component (TSX) + a CSS patch for the chosen style
4. The new section wipes in with clip-path, the old one blurs out
5. Next section enters the queue, one at a time, no race conditions
Output: 8 sections of a 2015 hosting site rebuilt in ~20s, streamed line by line in the terminal
3 styles, one renderer: orthographic globe + lambert shading → ASCII / 2-color halftone / ink stipple
Scroll yourself and it redesigns whatever you land on
Jev decides fast, Opus designs it
28
79
697
106,576
Devix retweeted
so they are leaving all engagement farm accounts that are crt-c+v shit posts from each other and getting payed 4 it
and targeting a nano scale account trying to get any feedback for in progress work that i don't know if it gong to work or not and trying to reach to PROs
🤨 @x
1
2
52
$500 a month is higher than the median income in 128 countries.
That is 66% of all 193 UN member states.
Outside the top 10 richest nations, almost nobody can afford that kind of subscription.
This goes completely against what they promised when raising billions: "intelligence too cheap to meter."
Intelligence built on our collective knowledge belongs to all of us.
This is why I am all in on open source.
OpenAI is quietly cutting usage limits so they can launch a $500 plan.
This is a pricing scam built on opaque subscription limits.
Two months ago, burning through a $200 plan was hard.
Last year, the $20 tier was more than enough for almost everyone.
Now? A $200 tier fails after one day of real work. The $20 tier is just a free trial.
We need real consumer protection for AI subscriptions.
64
51
704
44,460
Devix retweeted
Proton Mail Plus Price History (monthly)
• 2014 $4
• 2015 $4
• 2016 $4
• 2017 $3.99
• 2018 $3.99
• 2019 $3.99
• 2020 $3.99
• 2021 $3.99
• 2022 $3.99
• 2023 $3.99
• 2024 $3.99
• 2025 $3.99
• 2026 $3.99
Cheaper now.
Disney+ Price History, per month (ad-free)
• 2019 $6.99
• 2021 $7.99
• 2022 $10.99
• 2023 $13.99
• 2024 $15.99
• 2025 $18.99
• 2026 $21.49
It's a new annual ritual
50
76
1,977
114,050