AI has no more ontological being than a paintbrush. If Anthropic wants to debate this, they must expand their thinking beyond the confines of modernist philosophy.
Mission: Impossible
Holy shit the AI-is-people people not only have no idea what ontology is, they don't seem capable of grasping the concept, even though their assertions all implicate ontological claims.
Actually we do need to revive the humanities because these people are retarded
19th Century Spiritualism: a widespread and popular movement of the 1800s, by which practitioners attempted to communicate with the dead:
"Typical practices included home or public séances (group sessions for spirit contact), table-turning/tilting, automatic writing, direct-voice phenomena, materializations, levitations, spirit photography, and trance speaking (mediums channeling eloquent lectures from spirits)."
grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtMg_32…
Notable supporters:
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle: author of Sherlock Holmes
Alfred Russel Wallace: co-founder of Darwinian evolutionary theory
Victoria Woodhull: leader of women's suffrage movement in the US, first woman to run for US president
Occultism, though a separate movement, developed later out of Spiritualism, and many spiritualists also participated in occultism. Occultism was smaller, and was presented as a refinement to Spiritualism, whose participants numbered in the millions at its peak:
grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtMg_63…