Error 404: Disinformation Not Found. Evidence-led OSINT, sanctions & accountability. Telegram: @VeritasVeraOSINT #NAFO
London, England
- Tweets 5,839
- Following 3,756
- Followers 2,412
- Likes 7,160
Pinned Tweet
Veritas Vera is not neutral between invasion and defence.
That is exactly why sourcing discipline matters more, not less.
• Claims get matched against records.
• Sources are named wherever possible.
• Dates, context, and attribution matter.
• Visuals support evidence; they do not replace it.
Most X posts are rapid rebuttals and source-led summaries. Deeper evidence trails belong on Telegram and Substack.
Advocacy does not remove the need for discipline. It raises the bar.
1
3
604
Veritas Vera retweeted
@rwrjbb+ @cmdruupg* @WoolfieFareena* @marylouise996S* @latoyotajackson* @goodhumans2026* @clappdescendant* @yaness_____ @SamGion* @nafoviking* @Cyndibisa* @jjsalmo+ @HillwalkerNige* @Hewitt01Mike+ @Jms7777Justin+ @Rando02960168* @CurlyClare01+ @barbara_knee+ @FjordFella* @TainatoSir* @eastgermanboom* @nilocski+ @Error404GaryB* @SueSamirax11* @IrishDad16* x.com/SydesJokes/status/2103…
#FollowFriday for 25th September 2026 #FF #FollowBackFriday #FBFriday #FollowAFellaFriday #FFF #FBNAFO #NoFellaUnder5K #FBF #FBPE #FBPA #FBPPR #FBPR #FBR #TheResistance #Resist #Resister #Resisters #Resistance #FightFascism #StandUpToFascism #UnitedWeStand #FightRacism #StandUpToRacism #NAFO #NAFOFella #NAFOFellas #NAFOWorks #WeAreNAFO #NAFOExpansionIsNonNegotiable #NAFOSummit #SlavaUkraini #StrongerTogether #SupportUkraine @United24media @U24_gov_ua
4
14
21
218
Russia’s Defence Ministry says Svitla Dolyna has been captured.
Now look at the evidence.
OSINT geolocation shows a single Russian soldier raising flags at multiple locations around the settlement.
Independent battlefield assessment places the nearest confirmed Russian advance roughly 16 km away.
Russia has used flag-raising missions before to create the appearance of territorial control without actually consolidating it.
A flag proves someone reached a location.
It does not prove an army controls it.
Claim.
Method.
Record.
1
28
Putin says Kyiv talks about peace while doing everything to prevent peace and negotiations.
The record says something more complicated.
Ukraine says it is preparing for trilateral talks with Russia and the United States in October.
Today, Zelenskyy is in New York pushing an energy truce and wider de-escalation with President Trump.
That does not mean a peace agreement is close.
It does mean “Ukraine does not want negotiations” is not an accurate description of the record.
Disagreement over terms is not refusal to negotiate.
Claim.
Context.
Record.
I just spoke with President Trump @POTUS. An important conversation, and we got through a lot. We agreed to meet in New York, and this meeting could change a lot. There is diplomatic momentum.
I thanked the President for Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner’s visit to Kyiv. We went through the key details thoroughly, and they saw the situation in Ukraine firsthand. The peace track is our number one priority.
There are ideas for de-escalation steps and for addressing fundamental security issues – energy security, food security, and the protection of human life. We are working together with the American team and are ready to take really serious steps.
I thanked the American President for signing the Lindsey Graham bill into law. We all concur – there must be peace. Thank you to everyone who stands with Ukraine! Thank you to everyone who’s helping!
2
74
Russia says the new US sanctions are undermining peace efforts.
That is a claim about cause, not evidence of one.
The sanctions target Russian energy, defence and shadow-fleet revenues connected to financing the war.
Meanwhile diplomatic contacts continue: Zelenskyy and Trump meet today on de-escalation and an energy truce, with US-Russia talks also continuing.
And Russian military operations have not stopped.
Sanctions may affect negotiations.
That is not the same as proving sanctions are what prevents peace.
Claim.
Context.
Record.
23
Russia’s State Duma Speaker says the West interfered in Russia’s election and that only Russians should determine the country’s future.
Context matters.
The same election included voting in occupied Ukrainian territory, which the EU says it does not recognise, and Russia did not invite OSCE election observers.
Those facts don’t answer every interference allegation.
They do matter when assessing what this election represents.
Claim.
Context.
Record.
1
1
24
Russia’s election result is now being presented as evidence of public support for the war.
United Russia has won about 58% of the party-list vote.
That result is real.
But so is the context.
Most anti-war candidates were excluded from the ballot.
Russia’s only registered openly anti-war party was barred from the national party-list contest.
Voting was also held in occupied Ukrainian territory and Crimea.
So the result can tell us who won Russia’s election.
It cannot, by itself, tell us how Russians would have voted in a fully competitive election with a genuine anti-war option.
Claim.
Context.
Record.
14
Russia says Ukraine is attacking “democracy” by disrupting its parliamentary election.
There is one rather important detail.
Russia is holding that election inside occupied Ukrainian territory.
The OSCE says those votes have no validity under international law.
Russia also barred most anti-war candidates and refused OSCE election observers.
You cannot invade another country, export your ballot boxes under military occupation, remove much of the anti-war choice, and then present the result as democratic legitimacy.
Claim.
Record.
Receipt.
30
Putin says Ukraine has “degenerated into a dictatorship” because it has not held a presidential election during Russia’s invasion.
So let’s inspect Russia’s election.
Most anti-war candidates have been excluded.
Russia’s only registered openly anti-war party was barred from the national party ballot.
Political opponents are imprisoned, exiled or dead.
Voting is taking place inside occupied Ukrainian territory.
AP documented an armed Russian soldier standing beside voters at a polling station in occupied Donetsk.
And the Kremlin says the result will demonstrate support for the war.
Ukraine postponing elections under wartime law is apparently dictatorship.
Removing the anti-war option and holding ballots under occupation is apparently democracy.
Claim.
Record.
Receipt.
19
The timeline is doing quite a lot of work here.
Yes, serious talks took place in Istanbul.
But:
• Russia’s Kyiv offensive had already stalled and taken heavy losses before Istanbul.
• The March framework was not a finished peace treaty.
• Major security, territorial and military terms remained unresolved.
• Boris Johnson visited Kyiv on 9 April.
• Russia and Ukraine were still exchanging treaty drafts on 12 and 15 April.
Ukraine’s lead negotiator later said Johnson encouraged them to keep fighting.
He also said Ukraine did not trust Russia to honour the deal, neutrality required constitutional change, and credible security guarantees were missing.
So “Istanbul nearly signed → Bucha → Johnson arrived → peace died” is a narrative.
The documentary record is more complicated.
Russia pulled back from Kiev because of the Istanbul negotiations. The agreement was nearly signed.
Then came Bucha. Then Boris Johnson arrived.
Zakharova explains how it all happened.
43
Russia is again calling Bucha a “provocation”.
This time Maria Zakharova says the UN evidence was fabricated and even accuses the UN Secretary-General of joining the plot.
But Bucha was not established by one government statement.
UN investigators documented civilian killings and summary executions.
Human Rights Watch interviewed residents, victims, emergency workers and witnesses.
Independent satellite imagery showed bodies lying in the streets while Russian forces still controlled Bucha.
AP and Frontline reconstructed killings using CCTV, witness testimony and other evidence.
Repeating a denial for four years does not turn it into evidence.
Claim.
Record.
Receipt.
14
Moscow says the West is trying to “disrupt” Russia’s parliamentary election.
There is another part of the story.
Russia is holding that election in occupied Ukrainian territory.
Its only registered anti-war party was excluded from the national ballot.
Putin has framed the vote as evidence of public support for the war.
And election activity in occupied areas has been reported alongside armed Russian personnel.
An election can measure consent only if dissent is allowed to compete.
Calling criticism “interference” does not solve that problem.
Claim on one side.
Electoral conditions on the other.
1
17
The Kremlin says new US sanctions would hinder efforts to reach peace in Ukraine.
That is a political claim.
The same day, Russia launched a major missile-and-drone attack across eight Ukrainian regions.
Reuters reports 20 people wounded in Kyiv, damage to energy and telecom infrastructure, and a Tanzania-flagged vessel hit near Odesa, killing its captain and injuring three crew.
Russia says the strikes targeted military-linked infrastructure and vessels.
None of that, by itself, proves what does or does not make diplomacy succeed.
It does show why “what is obstructing peace” should be treated as an argument, not an uncontested fact.
Claim on one side.
Documented record on the other.
1
52
Two days is a long time in propaganda.
14 September:
TASS amplifies the claim that “not a single Russian shell or any other explosive device” has ever landed in an EU or NATO country.
16 September:
Polish prosecutors confirm a Russian Gerbera-2 drone found on the Polish coast was carrying a fragmentation warhead and detonator.
The exact route is still under investigation.
The categorical claim is not.
The hysteria in the West over Russia’s alleged plans to attack them is unfounded, and not a single Russian shell has ever landed in a NATO country, lawmaker Andrey Kolesnik told TASS in an interview:
vk.cc/d1Iqlt
22
Russia’s SVR says NATO intelligence services privately found no Russian link to the Leipzig/Halle drone plot and instead identified a “Ukrainian trace.”
That is a significant claim.
But it comes with an important evidentiary problem:
The SVR has not published the intelligence it says supports it.
Germany’s public position is very different. Its federal prosecutor is investigating the incident as a serious attack on transport and logistics infrastructure, and the German government attributes the attempted attack to Russia.
Russia rejects that attribution.
So the record currently contains two competing claims with very different levels of publicly available supporting material.
SVR claim: asserted, evidence not published.
German attribution: public investigation and stated government finding.
Claims are not receipts.
31
Russia’s Defence Ministry has repeatedly insisted that Russian forces do not strike civilian infrastructure.
Today provides another reality check.
A Russian drone hit a passenger minibus near Nikopol.
Five people were killed and at least seven wounded.
Hours earlier, a Russian drone struck the Kyiv–Mykolaiv passenger train.
Passengers and crew had been evacuated after advance warning.
None of this, by itself, proves the intent behind every individual strike.
It does something simpler.
It tests a categorical claim against the documented record.
“We do not strike civilian infrastructure” is the claim.
Passenger buses and passenger trains are the record.
Facts do not need exaggeration.
16
Yesterday, Donald Trump announced that Russia and Ukraine had agreed not to strike each other’s energy infrastructure.
Ukraine’s response was more cautious.
Zelenskyy said Kyiv was prepared to stop if partners could ensure Russia genuinely did the same, adding that Ukraine was not convinced Moscow would honour an agreement.
This morning, Russian drones struck petrol stations in Kyiv.
That does not prove Russia violated a ceasefire.
There is a more basic problem:
Russia had not publicly confirmed that ceasefire existed.
Announcing an agreement is not the same as having one.
And events on the ground remain the best reality check.
There is now a strong U.S. proposal for a mutual halt to strikes on critical infrastructure. If this can become the first de-escalatory step – a step toward ending Russian strikes on our critical infrastructure and our strikes in response – then Ukraine is ready to support de-escalation.
We see that the Russians feel the pressure from our precise strikes on Russia’s war economy. And so far, no one has seen any genuine desire on Russia’s part to move toward ending the war. But if our American partners can ensure that Russia is genuinely ready to stop this war aimed at destroying life – and to do so for real and for the long term – Ukraine will take its own de-escalatory steps.
Peace is needed. Energy, food routes, critical infrastructure – all of this must be part of the discussion on ending the strikes. We need a strong and fair solution, and not just for the “elections,” but for good. We expect specifics from our partners.
1
54
Russia says railway infrastructure in western Ukraine was struck because it was being used to bring military cargo from Europe.
There is one awkward detail.
The train struck near Yahodyn was a Kyiv–Warsaw passenger service.
It was travelling OUT of Ukraine toward Poland.
European officials had passed through the same station shortly beforehand.
That does not prove who Russia intended to hit.
But it does mean Moscow’s stated justification deserves scrutiny.
If the explanation is “military cargo coming from Europe,” the direction of travel matters.
A justification is not evidence.
27
Two days ago, Vladimir Putin said Europeans were being frightened by a “fake threat from Russia.”
“There is no such threat and there never has been.”
Today, Reuters reports a Russian drone struck near Yahodyn on Ukraine’s border with Poland.
Polish Border Guard says the impact site was around 800 metres from Polish territory.
In a separate incident, another Russian drone struck the locomotive of a passenger train around 2 km from the Polish border.
To be precise:
Russia did not attack Poland.
But when Moscow tells Europeans the Russian threat is imaginary, the geography belongs in the conversation too.
800 metres is not NATO territory.
It is not very far from it either.
29
Russia is rewriting Bucha again.
The Russian Foreign Ministry asks: “Where is the evidence? Where are the facts?”
The evidence never disappeared.
The UN documented civilian killings.
Human Rights Watch documented witnesses, physical evidence, imagery and named victims.
Reuters journalists documented the aftermath on the ground.
There is room to scrutinise evidence.
There is no honest route from scrutiny to pretending it never existed.
Bucha was investigated.
The victims had names.
The receipts never vanished.
21
Russia’s latest definition of “responsible.”
Medvedev says Moscow has the military capability to reduce Kyiv and key NATO facilities to “grey nuclear dust.”
Then, in the same argument, Russia presents itself as the responsible actor protecting humanity from catastrophe.
That is not reassurance.
It is nuclear coercion wrapped in the language of restraint:
Name the targets.
Describe the destruction.
Invoke apocalypse.
Then demand credit for not doing it.
The threat is the message.
1
60