12
78
289
19,799
Found In Blocks retweeted
2
3
18
430
Found In Blocks retweeted
Notorious $MSTR hater privates account and deletes all posts in wake of Bitcoin climbing 25% in a week. This is why you take screenshots people. No one will escape what’s coming when the bookmarks begin to come out. Everyone will realize they were fudded out of a generational entry by people chasing some clicks. Few.
77
13
357
21,022
Found In Blocks retweeted
I think there’s one thing we all deserve to know: What price did @comic (lil retard) buy most of his $MSTR at? Every villain has an origin story. I need the full story arc of how he became Strategy’s No. 1 villain.
2
2
2
439
Found In Blocks retweeted
Expose this retard and scammer
1
2
88
Check out my artwork used in @AAStack post !! 🧡
I see Bitcoiners complaining that Trump hasn’t done enough for Bitcoin. Fine. Hold him accountable. But some of you have incredibly short memories. The alternative wasn’t some imaginary libertarian administration waiting to embrace Bitcoin. It was four more years coming out of an administration where regulators told banks to pause crypto-related activity, Biden fought Congress over repealing SAB 121, his Treasury proposed a massive electricity tax on digital-asset mining, and Elizabeth Warren was openly making crypto a political enemy while repeatedly framing it as a national-security and criminal-finance threat. Kamala started talking about clearer digital-asset rules when the election got close. Maybe she would have changed course. Nobody can prove the counterfactual. But even Crypto4Harris existed partly because Democrats inside the industry were desperately trying to convince her campaign to reverse the existing Democratic approach. That tells you something. Compare that trajectory with where we are now: a U.S. Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, a materially friendlier banking environment, SAB 121 gone, and Washington debating how America can lead in Bitcoin and digital assets rather than how to choke the industry out. Trump deserves criticism when he fails to deliver. But pretending the two political outcomes were interchangeable is intellectually dishonest. Bitcoin doesn’t need Republicans. Bitcoin doesn’t need Democrats. Bitcoin doesn’t need Trump. Bitcoin will keep producing blocks regardless. But if you think the government standing out of Bitcoin’s way doesn’t matter, you weren’t paying attention from 2021–2024.
1
1
7
287
Found In Blocks retweeted
I see Bitcoiners complaining that Trump hasn’t done enough for Bitcoin. Fine. Hold him accountable. But some of you have incredibly short memories. The alternative wasn’t some imaginary libertarian administration waiting to embrace Bitcoin. It was four more years coming out of an administration where regulators told banks to pause crypto-related activity, Biden fought Congress over repealing SAB 121, his Treasury proposed a massive electricity tax on digital-asset mining, and Elizabeth Warren was openly making crypto a political enemy while repeatedly framing it as a national-security and criminal-finance threat. Kamala started talking about clearer digital-asset rules when the election got close. Maybe she would have changed course. Nobody can prove the counterfactual. But even Crypto4Harris existed partly because Democrats inside the industry were desperately trying to convince her campaign to reverse the existing Democratic approach. That tells you something. Compare that trajectory with where we are now: a U.S. Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, a materially friendlier banking environment, SAB 121 gone, and Washington debating how America can lead in Bitcoin and digital assets rather than how to choke the industry out. Trump deserves criticism when he fails to deliver. But pretending the two political outcomes were interchangeable is intellectually dishonest. Bitcoin doesn’t need Republicans. Bitcoin doesn’t need Democrats. Bitcoin doesn’t need Trump. Bitcoin will keep producing blocks regardless. But if you think the government standing out of Bitcoin’s way doesn’t matter, you weren’t paying attention from 2021–2024.
14
15
82
3,043
Check out my artwork used in @AAStack post 🟧🧡
Bitcoin didn’t die on 8/8. If anything, BIP-110 proved it’s alive and working exactly as designed. Decentralization was never supposed to eliminate conflict. It was designed to survive it. Miners have influence. Developers have influence. Wall Street has influence. Governments have influence. Node operators have influence. But influence is not control. There’s no CEO of Bitcoin. No headquarters. No master server. No institution that can simply rewrite the rules and force everyone else to accept them. Bitcoin doesn’t require us to agree. It was designed specifically because we won’t. The fighting, competing incentives, different implementations, lobbying, signaling and disagreement aren’t necessarily signs that decentralization failed. That’s what a system without a king looks like. Bitcoin didn’t die on 8/8. It did exactly what it was designed to do. Tick tock, next block.
1
1
4
363
Found In Blocks retweeted
Bitcoin didn’t die on 8/8. If anything, BIP-110 proved it’s alive and working exactly as designed. Decentralization was never supposed to eliminate conflict. It was designed to survive it. Miners have influence. Developers have influence. Wall Street has influence. Governments have influence. Node operators have influence. But influence is not control. There’s no CEO of Bitcoin. No headquarters. No master server. No institution that can simply rewrite the rules and force everyone else to accept them. Bitcoin doesn’t require us to agree. It was designed specifically because we won’t. The fighting, competing incentives, different implementations, lobbying, signaling and disagreement aren’t necessarily signs that decentralization failed. That’s what a system without a king looks like. Bitcoin didn’t die on 8/8. It did exactly what it was designed to do. Tick tock, next block.
11
15
104
2,832
Thank you for the support!! Everyone go check out @corn_hodl awesome stuff 🧡! nitter.net/i/jf/cards/money/share…
1
4
198
Found In Blocks retweeted
Bitcoin doesn’t need to be “saved” from institutions because institutions don’t control Bitcoin. They can build products around it. They can create ETFs, derivatives, lending markets, and custodial services. They can influence public narratives. They can lobby regulators. But none of that changes the protocol unless the broader ecosystem voluntarily adopts those changes. Bitcoin’s strength is that no single company, government, developer, or billionaire can redefine its monetary policy or force a consensus change on unwilling participants. Attempts to steer Bitcoin are not new. Exchanges, miners, companies, governments, and influential individuals have all tried to shape its direction over the years. Sometimes they succeed in influencing discussion. Sometimes they influence adoption. But they don’t automatically control consensus. If institutions over-financialize Bitcoin, users can still self-custody. If custodians become dominant, users can withdraw. If one implementation changes in an unpopular way, alternatives can emerge. If regulation becomes restrictive in one jurisdiction, the network continues elsewhere. Bitcoin’s resilience comes from voluntary participation, open competition, and the ability of anyone to reject changes they disagree with. The real question isn’t whether powerful actors will try to influence Bitcoin, they almost certainly will. The question is whether Bitcoin’s decentralized incentives remain strong enough that no group can permanently subordinate the network to its own interests.
4
7
32
2,413
It is a multi-vector attack. First, embrace Bitcoin publicly. Increase its supply through financialized exposure and suppress its volatility through the derivatives complex. Control the narrative through X, institutional media, influencers and conferences. Then attack the critical choke point: the code itself, by influencing developers and Core through concentrated funding channels. Introduce technical changes gradually, using a boiling-frog strategy that avoids triggering broad resistance within the community. Meanwhile, build the Wall Street infrastructure and political cover required to achieve regulatory capture inside the existing financial system. This is not a spontaneous shift. It is a sophisticated, multi-year operation. The objective is to neutralize Bitcoin’s monetary threat to the dollar. Do not ban it. Do not seize it. Financialize it. Contain it. Turn it into a store-of-value asset that can be controlled, collateralized and absorbed into the existing system. It is the modern version of 6102. Pre-position inside the asset. Integrate the infrastructure before the broader public understands what is happening. Then validate Bitcoin from the top down by formally recognizing it as a new form of collateral. The announcement triggers the repricing. The repricing recapitalizes the institutions and political actors who were positioned in advance. Bitcoin then becomes the inflation-capture mechanism for the AI transition: a controlled monetary release valve capable of absorbing the currency debasement, capital formation and collateral expansion required to finance the next technological era. The threat is not that they will destroy Bitcoin. The threat is that they will successfully capture its economic function while preserving only the appearance of monetary freedom.
24
63
198
16,784
Check out my artwork used in @MarylandHODL21 article 🧡🟧 !
We are now past the 4th of July, an important milestone, the 250-year anniversary of the United States. Bitcoin's technical indicators are flashing green. The $58K wall held twice, forming a double bottom. During this stress test, more physical Bitcoin changed hands than ever before. Positioning is now complete. Good news is moving Bitcoin again. That's the first sign the suppression phase is ending. Bad news is losing its ability to move the market. The Saylor bears are running out of steam. The market has absorbed the idea that Strategy can sell Bitcoin when necessary, and that's okay. STRC is primed and ready. It just needs Bitcoin to recover. The rest will take care of itself. The Trump empire is announcing Bitcoin purchases. Bessent and Warsh are in control. They're preparing the narratives. The yen is about to break out to the upside. Japan will be forced to raise rates, accelerating the unwind of the carry trade. That will create havoc across global markets and reinforce Warsh's argument. The AI trade is beginning to weaken, and it will only get worse as the reverse carry trade unfolds. The U.S. government needs a reason to intervene, backstop the sector, print gobs of money, and deploy capital into AI at discounted valuations because it is now a national strategic asset. They want ownership without appearing too eager. With the abundance trade on pause, capital will seek scarcity. Bitcoin is the destination, especially as U.S. debt approaches $40 trillion by the end of September. The number itself doesn't matter. The psychology does. Expect people to get loud, especially if we approach another government shutdown standoff. The midterms only matter to the people. They hold no real ground. The ruling class is consolidating power. More importantly, it is consolidating military allegiance and institutional alignment. The era of the American Caesar is approaching. Rome took many forms. I expect America will as well. Geopolitical blocs are forming. Russia, China, and the United States are playing on the same team, even if only temporarily. The real enemy is the central banking cartel. Iran is a distraction. The United States is ultimately leaving the Middle East and much of Europe. I also believe Iran was, in some way, part of the play against the cartel. Just as the Bitcoin influencer class went dark in early 2025, the orders came down again a few weeks ago. It started with your favorite X Spaces mouthpieces. It's now moving through your favorite influencers. Soon, it will be all of them. The "Architects" of this pivot used the lower bound of the Power Law and the four-year cycle to allow market participants to justify price suppression while key players positioned. Wall Street will use those same narratives to tell everyone it is finally safe to buy, after they have already accumulated. The Marketing Machine called Wallstreet will be given the Greenlight. Bitcoin X has been turned back on. That's a big tell. Maybe it's bullshit. Maybe it's not. But it's certainly worth raising an eyebrow. Everything is converging toward a validation event. Clarity will arrive through a surprise vote. The government could announce a framework to capitalize the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve... possibly even make a strategic investment in MSTR designed to strengthen STRC inorder to realign market incentives, whether officials openly acknowledge that objective or not. Over time, MSTR will effectively become additive to the US Strategic Bitcoin Reserve. That would not happen overnight. It would unfold gradually over the next decade as the world comes to understand Bitcoin’s value as pristine collateral and the government steadily increases its ownership. MSTR shareholders will ultimately be rewarded for the volatility, dilution, and abuse they endured during the transition. MSTR will become the most valuable company in the world and Saylor will regain is stature among maxis. MSTR’s role as a capital-markets conversion mechanism is too important to jeopardize through a 6102-style seizure that would damage Bitcoin’s economics and undermine confidence in the asset itself. A gradual absorption through the rarely discussed U.S. Sovereign Wealth Fund makes far more strategic sense. Things are about to move fast. Soon.
4
10
643