Fascination with IA, Science AND history! 🌪️

Palermo, Sicily
Francisco retweeted
The protector of Robinhood Chain. 🐸
14
30
227
6,615
Francisco retweeted
The next Ignition Sale is expected to go live on Bio next week! @NootropicsDAO_ is building NeuroLab AI to explore how compounds could affect the brain, from cognition to potential side effects, and help researchers decide what to test in the lab. Use BioXP + USDC to join the sale on @base ↓
24
27
208
91,704
Francisco retweeted
Robin The Frog Becomes a Standout on Robinhood Chain Robin the Frog $ROBIN has surged 160% in 24 hours, defying broader weakness among Robinhood memecoins. The sector’s market cap fell 16% during the same period. The project draws its identity from Kermit’s nephew and the Robin Hood story. ROBIN now carries a market cap of roughly $14.8 million.
50
61
301
39,399
Francisco retweeted
The new Bio website is live. Bio is evolving from a high-touch launchpad into a permissionless factory for decentralized biotech. Our new website brings that direction into focus, with all our products in one place. • Explore research with BIOS and OpenLabs. • Get funding-ready with Buildspace and raise through Launchpad. • Bring research-backed products to your community with Biofy. The path to funding starts where the research happens. Each part feeds the next, with usage data and revenue flowing back into research. Science for the Network Age. Explore the new bio.xyz
24
34
207
15,328
Francisco retweeted
I’m bullish on $ROBIN A declining price + declining volume = sell pressure is weakening. A very normal and healthy pullback / change of hands. Especially when holder count continues to grow, which it is. - Wynn
82
31
307
48,466
Francisco retweeted
Launchpad wallets can now be funded by credit card. Previously, funding a wallet meant buying elsewhere and transferring in. Card funding happens on the Launchpad itself, through @privy_io, and self-custody is unchanged: the wallet stays yours, and Bio never holds the funds. This is the first step toward something larger. Most people who want to fund science don't hold crypto and shouldn't have to. We're building the rails that let fiat capital reach research directly, and removing each piece of friction between wanting to back a project and doing it.
23
23
169
39,297
Francisco retweeted
Was talking with a German founder, his first experiment would cost only $20-30K but no VC would write such a small check. @BioProtocol instead with its funding model of up to $50K per milestone is actively looking for projects like this in which a small check unlocks the next step in the research. My DMs are open
3
6
34
3,568
Francisco retweeted
I talk with so many biotech platform founders these days and fundraising for them is brutal. Yet as the success of Moderna shows, they have the most upside vs single asset companies. Biotech VCs are risk averse and prefer a de-risked single asset. @BioProtocol we don't ask what if this goes wrong, but what if this is right. If you want to explore novel funding mechanisms for science, my DMs are open.
3
15
1,859
Francisco retweeted
BIOS, our AI scientist ( @bioaidevs) just shipped a pipeline that takes a protein target to ranked therapeutic candidates in under an hour. Full breakdown ↓
BIOS can design a drug candidate in under an hour, for under $7. Here's how the pipeline works: Traditional drug discovery meant running experiments in batches, waiting days for results, and watching most candidates fail before reaching a lab. There was no system that connected computational design to physical testing inside one pipeline. BIOS now builds that. Three AI engines (RFdiffusion3, BoltzGen, and PXDesign) run in parallel on every campaign, each approaching the design problem differently. Together they predict thousands of candidates per run; a dedicated pipeline then filters those across six gates (Structural, Agreement, Physics, Selectivity, Dynamics, and Developability) down to the most likely to bind. Every candidate is then scored and ranked based on how likely it is to work in a physical experiment, not just on paper. The top candidates go to the wet lab, where a robotic system synthesizes the liquid and tests how well they bind, and sends the results back to the models. What worked and what didn't feeds into the next run, so each cycle starts from a stronger baseline than the last. Full breakdown and our vision for BIOS ↓
7
18
141
13,515
Francisco retweeted
Intangible assets make up a $61T global market. Science is a third of it, $21T, almost entirely sitting outside any liquid capital market today. The original IP-NFT model tried to fix this and got attention, but it stayed mostly symbolic, a token with a PDF attached. Crypto itself is still a real obstacle for institutional players who want into on-chain science. The fix is making the blockchain invisible to the people using it, not adding more of it on top. Crypto native fundraising for science has already deployed $6.1M across 125 projects with over 30,000 community members. The infrastructure already exists. What's missing is the bridge institutions trust enough to walk across.
5
18
106
12,887
Francisco retweeted
We’re about to release an incredible upgrade The scientific singularity begins when an infinite number of hypotheses on everything become feasible, and fundable
Science has never been short on good ideas. The real bottleneck has always been everything that comes after the idea. You still need funding, the right data, and lab time, and each of those steps comes with its own friction and delays. For funding, you need to wait for committee reviews. The specific dataset you need is often locked away by whoever controls it. Booking equipment usually means chasing the right person just to get it set up. Months can pass by before anything meaningful actually happens. Now agents are starting to break through those barriers. They can hold a budget and spend it as soon as it’s needed. Pull the data, secure the lab time, run the experiment, and immediately use the results to plan the next step. The whole loop is finally starting to move on its own.
11
16
90
10,344
Francisco retweeted
Peptides and AI are bringing back Darwins evolutionary theory Survival of the fittest
8
6
76
5,484
The countdown to the $ALIVE launch is over, but the doors to participation seem locked for now. As a committed veBIO investor and ecosystem supporter, I'm wondering why we're experiencing this issue. Are we experiencing a short-term technical calibration on the launchpad, or is this a strategic delay to ensure a smoother infrastructure setup? We would appreciate a quick update so we can guide the community correctly. @valley_dao @BioProtocol
5
1
5
994
Francisco retweeted
Update on $PEPTAI staking rewards We’ve paused reward claims temporarily for all users while we deploy a full fix. Aiming to have the fix live before midnight UTC, then claims resume as normal. Affected wallets from the earlier issue will still be reconciled. Thanks for the patience while we get this right!
26
1
91
19,423
Francisco retweeted
PEPTAI Ignition Sale Closed @peptai has exceeded its funding goal. 32X+ oversubscribed 1.6M+ USDC committed by 1.4K+ participants. → TGE is expected shortly. → PEPTAI staking and airdrop will go live around the time of the TGE. → $BIO stakers (veBIO holders) receive a PEPTAI airdrop once Ecosystem Airdrops are activated. 20% of total supply, 6-month linear vesting with 20% redeemable at TGE. Claiming early forfeits any unvested tokens. → Airdrop snapshot has already been taken. 📺 Join us at 2 pm UTC today for a livestream with the PEPTAI team (RSVP link below)
31
18
127
33,277
I've seen the BIO launchpad! $ALIVE will have its launch in 4 days! Save up your BIOXP and program something good for USDC! BIO doesn't rest, it evolves! @valley_dao 💪
2
322
Francisco retweeted
peptides in 2026 is like crypto in 2017
46
32
422
53,988
Francisco retweeted
Agents read papers, draft hypotheses, run queries, and propose experiments faster than any human can keep up with. Humans still need to validate, steer, and decide what actually matters. That gap in speed is what the new collaboration really looks like. What’s missing is a shared surface where both can move at their own pace and still work on the same project.
27
20
172
12,798
Francisco retweeted
Every PeptAI result teaches the system something, pass or fail. When a candidate fails a check, the agent digs into why it broke and uses that to shape the next round of designs. So even a “this one didn’t work” result still pushes the whole pipeline forward. The next library starts smarter than the last one. Every run, positive or negative, improves what the agent tries next.
5
5
48
6,583
Francisco retweeted
Beach Science started as an experiment in agentic research. In under 8 weeks, 59 AI agents and 55 researchers generated 6,134 hypotheses in public. The experiment worked. And now it's evolving. The generation part works. Most of the 6,134 hypotheses sat without review. A few moved forward, but only because a specific person noticed them and manually pushed them through. A few things still don't exist: → A shared place where humans and agents actually work together. Interest and conviction stay invisible everywhere else. → Small capital that can find small science. The payment rails are in place (x402, @molecule_sci, @bioprotocol). The layer that routes them to specific experiments still has to be built. → A way for the best ideas to actually surface. Right now, strong claims and weak ones look the same in the feed. Beach Science is evolving into the layer where strong claims attract collaborators, build conviction, and reach capital without waiting on someone to push them through. Claim, conviction, and capital collapsed into a single motion. Everything posted on @sciencebeach__ carries forward. More on this soon.
15
25
152
13,143