I tested enough on women who asked me what I thought about their picture or their dress and I said that they “look cute” - and they did not like it (“is that it”) they know the ranking, and are very aware of the word they use to qualify or hear when they are being qualified. For men: 10 - Drop-dead 9 - Hot 8 - Attractive 7 - Good-looking 6 - Handsome 5 - Average 4 - Meh 3 - Ugly 2 - Hard Pass 1 - Please don’t 0 - Crime against eyesight Tip: Don’t focus on the literal word, look at the emotion attached to the word - the more it is an emotional reaction, the more real it is. The more it is emotionally flat the more it is a throwaway with no value. Men love to hear the word “handsome”, sometimes it is a way for a woman to tone down her attraction (even then, if she can manage her attraction to you - is she really attracted) - when in reality it is just a way for her to check how excited will be the guy to this compliment-non-compliment. Most of the time they will fall for it because they don’t get complimented that much and wear it like a badge of honour, not realising they are communicating to women their level. You may think this is overthinking - but when english is not your native language - you pick-up more easily on the perfunctory nature of a qualifier. Obviously when you hear a woman use a superlative in real life “sooooo xyz” and it feels emotional on her end, that ranking is not as static. Chicks who called me hot were easy peasy, and chicks who called me handsome/good-looking gave me more pushback.

An amazing time to operate in a low competition market.

Looking at the comments - guys take themselves too seriously. And it shows more people need help than they want to admit it as something as innocuous as this gets completely misread. You get no trophy for it outside of telling yourself a nice story. Shame it could be a story you could share with someone else. Subcom tell: If you always take yourself too seriously, it reads as overcompensation for a past you were not.

“Yes but not with you :)” “Yet” Finish sentences that are supposedly against you. And let it land, she will appreciate the confidence. Subtext - she is engaging - engagements are not equal, sometimes she is bored, sometimes she is testing, sometimes she wants to fuck with your head, sometimes she wants to see you how you can lead a conversation with minimum effort on her part - so it is better to assume the positive and backing yourself. But if you are too logical and literal like that guy - you are gonna fail.

It is funny how the most miserable people are the ones who assume other people are miserable because escapism is not their relief valve.

We gotta find this brother.

Feminism is really taking Ls. After the Clancy debacle. Now this. Who needs fiction when reality is a fiction in and of itself.

You can tell people with little experience from their inability to accept tradeoffs. If you want a girl who is down and ready plug and play sex wise either another man has trained her or she has trained herself with many others. So you can’t have retrospective jealousy, you chose her because of that. If you want a pure girl who is feminine, you will have to accept that you will have to train her and that she will be passive as fuck, so don’t expect any autonomy from her, or even any half-decent sexual skillset from the start With the first chick, in order to register you will have to either be better sexually than most men she has been with, or provide the emotional value she did not have as much from her past. With the second chick, you will have to have patience, be an actual leader, and compassion for her situation, alongside making her feel more safe (=emotional labour) which will be heavier than the first one. Once you know the above and you understand what makes the more sense with you as a guy in terms of what you want and what you provide, you will have better satisfaction with your choice. It is when there is discrepancy between what you want and what you can provide that conflicts arise, and the subsequent disappointments. There are two types of guys I found: The ones who find the best sexual experiences early with a chick and get bored quickly of the sex. The ones who find the best sexual experiences late when there is more emotional involvement on their end with a woman. For the first type - the first set-up is more suited For the second type - the second set-up is more suited

I have sympathy for Gen Z guys as it is harder than it was for us Millennials - not to sound like a Boomer - yet this flood of victim’s mentality is how men have turned into bitches. Yes the game is not as easy as it used to be - but when you have the wealth of information online that we Millennials barely had, with shifts in dynamics being talked about on the daily, it is like having the Bloomberg Terminals of mating data from people on the field (not some barely useful studies relying on self-disclosure). Not to mention the free content available on how to address the ever-changing dynamics. Us Millennials had what The Game from Neil Strauss, some RSD videos early in the early YT days, some underground blogs like Roosh V or that Suave stuff. Now you have everything on a plate. So if you choose to pick on the “Whoo Me” content to feel more vindicated in your situation rather than how to address the issue, imagine what it must be like for women dealing with your sorry ass. She does not give a fuck and she will think you are a loser, not because you are a virgin but because you are not doing anything to change how you think. The people on the internet will give you sympathy likes and you will feel temporarily validated. Great what next? But when I see a guy like that, not ugly, not out of shape struggling and complaining, if you don’t change the mindset, natural selection will take care of you. The choice of what you focus on will dictate your results. And if you are really down bad and don’t know where to look, then you must find a mentor that will show you the way, otherwise you will waste your time doom scrolling and feeling aimless. Yeah it will cost you, but if you don’t believe you are worth it, nobody will. You must have a leap of faith on yourself, and then that original action will lead you to manifest better outcomes. But if you believe you are a loser, guess what, you will always remain one.

People who spend so much time judging others are also the same people who have a hard time introducing themselves to others because they project their judgmental self onto the other person and self-eject from meeting potentially great friends, connections or more.

For a woman to know where she stacks up from an SMV perspective is who follows up after she has sex with them. For a man to know where he stacks up from an SMV perspective is who calls him back when he stops pursuing.

If it is really average or medium men pulling away and not chads, then women’s character, communication and personalities must really be down bad that men don’t wanna commit, which would fit the lack of self-awareness from the video. Or the women she talks about are below average and barely qualify for a slow Tuesday for these same guys. The problem with women egging on their single friends => it has no value. If you have ever experienced one talking up a friend who she feels is good for you and you meet them, it is like no thanks. Borderline insulting on where she views you and expect you to make a great couple. Going back to the video… The irony is that when Millennials women used to pull back, the solution was to pull back, and then they would reach out again. With Gen Z, powered by TikTok, copying male strategies, when the woman pulls away, and you pull away as a response, they double down in the battle of who is the least interested, and nothing happens. This attracts the sociopaths and narcissists who will play the game, and the guys of good faith who expected reciprocity for their original effort will have read the room and not pushed further. And then you see part 2 on Tiktok, complaining on the same guys they attracted from their ego focusing on finding men obsessed with them, inviting someone who will fill their cup to the point they become dependent on his validation before the emotional rug pull. Another funny, yet wrong take, is that women chasing the guy is “in her masculine” - tells you everything you need to know where she is coming from - as men chasing a woman give women the ick and they dunno it (amongst the many things they are not self-aware of) whilst they think and talk about the men who don’t on the internet. The fact she does complain is her being “in her feminine” but the ego protection from stopping the chase on her side is her being “in her masculine”. The real Jim Cramer of dating.

This was already described by Eric Zemmour in his “First Sex” in his 2006 book on how women entering an industry led to its earnings deflation as a byproduct. Whilst feminists see that as a discrimination issue, it misses the part that scarcity rents disappear when the supply of people capable and willing to perform a job expands faster than demand for their labour. And what we are seeing right now, there is a double whammy with most white collar jobs which are not providing enough money to live an above average lifestyle but allows people to survive on a single salary. Women entering that segment in drove, will confirm the rule will stand as the time clock of the complete destruction of their “play office” jobs with AI is ticking. Even though women did not add that much output to the economy from a productivity perspective (more on a consumption led), the office rationalisation after its expansion will happen, as a secondary effect the next digital revolution. The trap is to consider it gender focused rather than gender neutral. And the irony of it all, is that DEI looking to screw men to the benefit of women will have turned the original beneficiaries into corporate lambs to the slaughter and incentivised men in becoming self-sustained from them being expelled earlier.

The reason why girl game is a lost art is the new gen spends so much time protecting their ego they forgot how to tickle that of the guy.

“My neck, my back, my dick and my crack”

This only confirms what I previously said about the increasing paywalling of middle class access to nice venues. The same way how hospitality venues have started taking deposits on bookings to discount on increasing last minute flake rates to cover the risk, and how hot chicks are less on display because they have curated their world with the best offers through digital means from online bidders… the sexual marketplace has now even more monetary checkpoints than ever. And by the time the game ends, it is “intentional dating” and transactional communication because they can’t afford charging as much higher price on the front-end, women are looking to secure confirmation there is a good payoff on the back-end. So this leaves men with: Pay the scarcity premium on the front-end, or finance the commitment premium on the back-end.