Wæs
Wall St Retαrd retweeted
To this day the greatest mog of all time. I’m not sure why the guy recording posted it but I’m glad he did
286
3,943
140,684
10,674,411
Wall St Retαrd retweeted
You ask a lib how much they're spending per kid at the PvP-enabled Chromebook Academy in Brooklyn and they say "I dunno, $3,000?" Then you tell them it's actually $45,000, and they look at you like this and say "Well, maybe it should be $100,000."
27
339
7,138
122,990
The long term strategic maneuvering coming out of Iran has been incredible. Truly playing a bad hand improbably well
1
19
694
Wall St Retαrd retweeted
“Most importantly, Israel and the United States should deepen their military, technological, intelligence and economic integration to such an extent that inflicting financial harm on Israel would also carry a significant cost for Washington.”
Yup that’s the game now.
FDD director Mark Dubowitz advises Israel to brace for potential future US sanctions on its West Bank policies by:
1. Reducing the violence
2. Embedding itself more into US military, tech & intel
3. War gaming to prepare financial countermeasures against possible 🇺🇸 sanctions
29
405
1,562
79,512
Wall St Retαrd retweeted
So cool how our largest city has this giant Jewish cult from the middle ages constantly doing bizarre rituals on the streets and randomly colonizing NYC suburbs and we’re just like not supposed to say anything
This is happening right now in New York.
Thousands of people transferring their sins into live chickens. Then the chickens are slaughtered and sent to the same stores as any other chicken.
Someone is eating a bird a stranger used as a vessel for their guilt. 🧵 (film link in thread)
140
1,750
21,650
789,814
A special affinity group for jews that will include shabbat dinner invites / cool events and will also be a space to share job opps and amplify each other's content and work?
Brother that’s just called America
19
589
Same thing with NYC brownstones. Couldn’t build one today for a profit if your life depended on it, and many were originally solidly middle class dwellings
21
782
Crazy that the skilled labor to create something like this (especially outside of a tier-1 city) just doesn’t exist at enough scale to make it economically viable, despite importing ~90 million people in the last century
4
9
196
5,243
There shouldn’t be a single policy that comes out of the Republican party that is ever qualified with “only applies to <$100k households”
Same with the proposed payment for stay at home, married caretakers. Should instead almost definitely exclude anyone making less than $40k
1
6
126
Trump’s $5,000 dividend to voters would make sense if it was actually reverse means-tested
Why would we want to reward anyone who isn’t a net tax contrubtor? That’s not his constituency and they are already subsidized in almost every aspect of their lives
2
1
19
724
My main gripe with flock cameras is that they don’t automatically execute anyone. Huge oversight they need to fix asap
1
41
647
Carolina
You may think you understand how mindraped the average liberal is in 2026, but you really do not
273
807
16,433
607,404
Meaningless civnat slop is all these people have. There are 15 completely inconsequential Chinese cities that are larger than New York. YIMBYs don’t understand what makes America great, and blindly increasing population is neither fair nor Good.
Obfuscating about “subsidies given to suburban and exurban municipalities and homeowners” when literal troglodytes on welfare get paid to occupy the center of our largest metropolis is more stupidity than it is cope (although it is both).
Referencing the constitution as some ineffable guiding light in a situation where we are being extracted from and ruled over by the lowest and most unproductive members of our society is the same reason we got into this situation in the first place, and why it will take a federal takeover to fix this city. These people are slaves to ideology and tax sinks, but they enjoy that position.
Too few people live in New York; it should again be the world's most populated and most productive city on the planet within its municipal borders alone. Americans are guaranteed the right to free movement in the constitution whereas non-Americans do not have that right. I quite like the constitution and dislike Hukou style restrictions on internal freedom of movement.
Additionally, allowing densification in cities in general (as well as removing the subsidies given to suburban and exurban municipalities and home owners) would allow for other American cities to become denser and better, thereby alleviating some of the pressure to move to the few true urban cores in the US. I actually agree that subsidizing demand is suboptimal (or rather, actually harmful) in most cases. Continuing to harp on this as if I have said otherwise is a sign of questionable literacy, if nothing else.
Also, true to his name, WSR has reverted back to discussing who deserves to live here after initially criticizing that level of discourse. No one deserves to live in a given place per se, as per his initial post. Americans do have the right to live anywhere within the US if they have the means. Building more housing simply improves those means. I do very much believe the state exists to protect our rights and improve the welfare of its citizens. I'm not sure what he thinks it is for.
1
2
31
1,479
Too many people live here already, it is actually a question of who deserves to, whether that is polite or not. Otherwise might as well ask who wants to live in America. Does the 80% of the world who wants to deserve to? Why aren’t we building homes for them? I don’t want more people here, or to make it easier for them.
If every subsidized renter had to pay market rent, the median rental cost for everyone else would instantly fall between where they are paying ~1.5k, and where we are now >5k, and we wouldn’t have to deal with criminals and invalids in the middle of the most precious zone in our country and probably the world
You can build market rate housing as well (and should). Increasing construction does not mean increasing subsidized housing in all cases and, despite the odd claim otherwise, increasing supply does lower prices for housing. Housing already has a toll associated with it, unlike freeways which are free. So, demand is not induced in the same manner as it is lane expansion.
Truly abolishing all forms of housing subsidization would disincentivize suburban construction overall. If land use policy, etc. allows, then this would also lead to an increase in urban construction and new homes within urban cores. Without getting into a discussion of what people deserve or do not deserve, we can discuss incentives both potential and actually realized as they pertain to policy. If more people want to live in cities (or if the denizens of cities want housing to be cheaper) allowing more construction is a desirable policy for them to pursue.
1
22
2,352
The people currently in subsidized housing and projects effectively prevent artists from living in the city at reasonable rates
Go check them out sometime and let us know how that goes
1
7
256
Tend to agree in abstract, but almost no one working a productive, salaried job even at the level of Chipotle is in subsidized housing.
Do people making <$60k deserve anything more than a studio or 1bd with a commute into the city? Probably not
Perma unemployed? Definitely no
8
16
4,063
Neither works. Underlying problem is assumption of “deserving” access to limited goods. Toll highways, priority will sort itself out. Congestion pricing is great.
All subsidized housing should be abolished, and made into market rate rent. Why do they deserve to live in the city?
Guy who thinks building more houses will depress prices but that adding more lanes to the highway won’t relieve congestion.
3
5
79
80,308