I think rather to a castle for that kind of money or maybe go to Battle and spend the difference on pub dinner. I did really want to see it when I first heard about it but to me it's equivalent of handing money to nearest mugger.
Even as a lover/studier of history, I’m not remotely enthused and am certainly not spending 33 quid on a ticket - and possibly being turned away. I’d rather see Picasso at the RA for 20 quid. Van Gogh at the National (outstanding) a couple of years ago was 24 quid. It’s a rip-off, over-commercialised, corporate eventised, Harold would put an arrow in his eye himself to escape it. And oh the Bayeux Tapestry bores/snobs. Painful.