🧵 Thread of Threads. 🧵 In this tweet I had linked all of my beneficial threads, (mostly the threads refuting the accusation leveled by polemicist's against Islam.) I'll be sharing more threads soon, Inshallah. In the meantime, I hope you enjoy reading these! 🌟✨

😂😂😂

We will all pass away one day and our social media may be the reason we lose out on our good deeds continuously, the insults, mockery and jokes we make today will cost us dearly tomorrow, think before you post!

Al-Biruni (440 AH) argued that Dhu al-Qarnayn was a Yemeni king because of the "Dhu" being common in their titles, like Dhu al-Manar, Dhu al-Adh'ar, Dhu al-Shanatir, Dhu al-Nuwas, Dhu Jadan, and Dhu Yazan. al-Athar al-Baqiya pp. 46-47

Windows XP is one of the best OS Microsoft have ever developed, (including it's wallpaper became a defining backdrop of our childhood)... Yet over time, we have sadly allowed this legendary OS to fade from our memory!

Anyone who’s followed this guy for a while knows his usual routine: giant collage of screenshots from whatever papers he can grab, a confident caption about whatever it is he's trying to prove, and no serious engagement with what the authors actually say. It gives the impression of doing serious research, but it’s really just tossing pictures of studies around and hoping no one reads them closely. Unfortunately for him, I happened to have some free time over the past few hours (and nothing better to do). I used an AI to pull the relevant passages from Fish’s work, then went back and checked everything against the actual articles and book chapters myself. So here's what's happening: Firstly, Mike seems to assume that any pattern or correlation that remains after some “controls” establishes a causal relationship. But controls don’t automatically create a clean, lab-like comparison. They just adjust for a few broad differences on paper (things like income or political system). Sometimes that helps clarify what might be causing a pattern. Other times, it barely scratches the surface because real-world outcomes are shaped by things you simply can’t “control away” with a few variables: history, conflict, foreign intervention, state stability, regional dynamics, and so on. Researchers know this, and they’re careful about how far they push their claims. Mike clearly isn’t. Fish himself is very clear about this. In his article on large-scale political violence he flat-out says that he and his co-authors: “cannot pretend to resolve the weighty question at hand or to make causal inferences” And that their findings are only: “a starting point” given the limits of the data. In other words: these studies are early attempts to map out a complicated issue, not a solid case for “Islam leads to X.” But Mike talks as if once a pattern survives a few controls, the explanation is already obvious. He never really stops to ask whether those patterns might be shaped by where many Muslim-majority countries are located in the first place: places shaped by post-colonial borders, proxy wars, foreign intervention, weak states, and long-running regional conflicts. So he’s clearly confused about what “controlling for” something can actually do. Adding GDP or a democracy score to a model doesn’t erase all those deeper forces, it just adjusts for a couple of broad differences on paper. It doesn’t recreate history or hold everything constant. And with some types of data, that kind of adjustment barely works at all, as you’ll see below from Fish himself. The terrorism chapter Now to the slides Mike posted from the terrorism chapter of "Are Muslims Distinctive?" The part he thinks really nails his point. From that chapter, he quotes Fish’s stats on high-casualty bombings (1994–2008): “…self-proclaimed Islamists have been responsible for over three-fifths of all incidents and nearly seven-tenths of all deaths. Terrorism is not a uniquely Muslim disease, but its perpetrators in recent times are disproportionately Islamists.” Fish adds: “Muslims may be prone to tolerate terrorism in the name of their religion, which in turn points our attention to explanations for Islamist terrorism that have a religious dimension.” So there is something to explain. But here is what Mike doesn’t tell you, even though it’s on the very same pages he’s drawing from. Fish immediately warns that the kind of statistical analysis he uses in other parts of the book doesn’t really work for these bombings: “Statistical analyses of the type that we conduct on many other matters in this book would be less useful here. … our units are neither people nor countries nor country-specific events, and it would be difficult to control for factors that may influence the incidence of terrorist bombings.” In simple terms: In other chapters, Fish is comparing countries or people, where you can at least try to line them up on income, regime type, region, etc. In this chapter, the “unit” is each bombing, and most of those bombings are piled up in a few places that are already on fire: civil wars, insurgencies, occupations, failed states. To “control for” things properly here, you’d need: - countries that are equally poor - equally authoritarian - with equally deep wars and foreign interference - that differ mainly in religion In reality, we don’t have neat pairs like “Muslim Afghanistan vs non-Muslim Afghanistan” or “Muslim Iraq vs non-Muslim Iraq” (I’m not saying we need “clone” countries for this to work, but you get the idea). The worst war zones are mostly Muslim countries, and war and the terrorism feed into each other. If you throw “civil war: yes/no” into the model, you’re partly controlling away the very conflict that produces the bombings in the first place. That’s why Fish says the usual style of analysis “would be less useful here” and that it’s “difficult to control” for the drivers of these bombings. He’s basically saying this shows what happened in that period, not the result of a clean, controlled comparison. He also underlines how context-bound these attacks are. He points out that: - A huge share of the bombings occur in just a handful of countries (Afghanistan, Algeria, India, Israel, Pakistan, Russia, Sri Lanka), and - Islamist-claimed bombings are even more concentrated inside war and insurgency zones. Fish notes that terrorist attacks are “much more likely to happen in places beset by civil wars or insurgencies than in places that are not.” So even as he tells you Islamists are over-represented in this kind of terrorism, he’s also telling you: - This is about certain groups in certain wars, - The data are not suited to a full “we’ve isolated Islam” analysis, - Terrorism itself is “not a uniquely Muslim disease.” Mike’s move is to take that limited, heavily qualified picture and talk as if Fish had shown: “We controlled for everything and proved Islam leads to terrorism.” Fish explicitly says he cannot do that here. Mike insists on pretending he can. Where the rest of Fish’s violence work points: If you look at the broader research Fish is drawing on, the story is even less like Mike’s slogan. In the article on large-scale political violence (civil wars and big episodes of internal conflict), Fish and his co-authors “find no evidence of a correlation” between a higher Muslim share of the population and more deaths from that kind of violence, and they stress again that they “cannot… make causal inferences” and see their results as a “starting point.” On ordinary violent crime, Fish is blunt. Summarizing the homicide data, he writes: “One explanation we can rule out is that Muslims are violent people.” He notes that predominantly Muslim countries have much lower murder rates than non-Muslim countries: “more Muslims, less homicide.” So from Fish you actually get three things at once: - No special Muslim excess in deaths from big civil wars. - Lower murder rates in Muslim-majority countries. - A specific, modern pattern where Islamists are over-represented among certain high-casualty bombings in a small cluster of war zones. A pattern Fish himself says is hard to analyse with proper controls. A careful reader might come away thinking: Muslims as a whole are certainly not more violent, but there is a terrorism problem around some Islamist movements in particular conflicts, shaped by a mix of political conditions, war, occupation, and state breakdown, not by Islam in isolation. Mike turns that into a single sweeping claim that Islam is the underlying cause of all these problems.

سوره الملك، رتويت لعلها تشفع لك..

Kaafirs are truly braindead retarded fools

They FAKED Muslims Praying on the Train and MILLIONS Fell For It #muslim #FactCheck #italytrain

Ah ils assument enfin que pour eux l'immigration c'est ok si t'es blanc

Another low iq bot. I have an entire chapter in my book called Misreading Judaism. I deal with the two powers in heaven literature. There were no Trinitarian Jews before Christ. Stop lying.

Notice how they are all promoting these Eastern European countries for their culture and religion, But not their economic performance and their safety, health care quality of life , Because its clear western countries out perform these eastern countries, the western they are calling unsafe

His argument is that Jesus being alive and the Prophet ﷺ being dead shows that Jesus is greater. So this means the Father and Holy Ghost were greater than the Son for 2 nights and 1 day right?

Let me answer. Greece requested that 1.5 million Christians (15% of the Ottoman Population) immigrate to Greece because it needed population. Now answer this: Turks were in Greece for about 400 years. Why isn't there a single mosque in Athens now? Hey @grok, how many Churches are there in Istanbul, and how many mosques are there in Athens now?

She is so dumb that she probably thinks Serbs are Catholic

Re: Health Update Worry & concern, I do in fact have another lung infection, it's the same lung I developed pneumonia in this year, which almost led to my death in January. Struggling to breathe, constant coughing. inshaʾAllāh I'll pull through this, please keep me in your duʿāʾs.

This really a useful studies thanks for sharing with us. May Allah reward you abundantly. AMEEN! 🤲

Good point. God “making it appear” that He’s unipersonal for millennia before revealing himself to be triune is a far better candidate for deception, given that this concerns the very nature of the God humanity is supposed to worship. Now compare that to merely making a man appear to have died when he in fact isn’t God and should not be worshipped.

Prophet ﷺ said: “Do not do evil to those who do evil to you, but deal with them with forgiveness and kindness.” He ﷺ also said: “The best of virtues is to maintain relations with one who cuts you off, to give to one who deprives you, and to forgive one who insults you”

Haqiqatjou/Allahyari debate has confirmed few facts: 1. Corruption of the Quran is a classical Shia 12ver position. 2. Enmity towards Sahabah and their takfir is a classical Shia 12ver position. 3. 12ver Imamah is absent from our Quran (i.e the only Quran). Unite with this?

Family, I'm currently in Scotland for a week. My talks in Glasgow will be on the 22nd, 24th, and 26th. Hoping to see you there! Details below.