Lindsay Clancy ‘deliberately and meticulously killed’ her 3 children.
She plead NOT GUILTY BY VIRTUE OF BEING A WOMAN.
And the jury is somehow composed of NINE women and three men.
And because of that IMBALANCE, the jury is deeply deadlocked after finishing its fifth day of deliberations.
So I think we can all see where this trial - AND OUR SOCIETY - is heading, right?
How is the jury PREDOMINANTLY FEMALE, not 50-50?
Should her identity as a woman and her mental-health history excuse her from criminal responsibility for what she did?
Obviously, the answer is NO.
Because if we start deciding who is accountable for murder based on identity, sympathy or political narratives rather than the facts of the crime, then what exactly is the point of having a justice system?
Justice cannot mean one standard for WOMEN and another standard for MEN.
The moment identity becomes more important than accountability, we no longer have equal justice.
We have IDENTITY justice.
And that is a very dangerous road to go down.
Because if Clancy can literally GET AWAY WITH MURDER, who's safe?