Data Scientist @0xProject | CFA | ex-@galaxyhq & TradFi | dune.com/seoul
New York, USA
- Tweets 1,548
- Following 683
- Followers 1,430
- Likes 6,704
Personal update: Excited to share that I'm joining @0xProject as a data scientist.
Time to get to work.
55
3
173
15,679
Saved you $2.99 / week
> 1M trades clustered at $5,500
> Kalshi: Not wash trading
> Beni: Looks suspicious
> CFTC: Maybe looking, no comment
cope. seethe. rage
Welcome to the finale
I partnered with the Wall Street Journal to release this article
Probably the single worst hit piece ever written about @Kalshi
Guess people will think twice before insulting me in public again
wsj.com/finance/currencies/5…
2
1
8
786
Season 1 finale of FAFO.
Wen Season 2?
cope. seethe. rage
Welcome to the finale
I partnered with the Wall Street Journal to release this article
Probably the single worst hit piece ever written about @Kalshi
Guess people will think twice before insulting me in public again
wsj.com/finance/currencies/5…
1
9
718
Tl;dr
1. Hubris does not get you far in this industry
2. Thanks for making CT great again @beniduboss
i thought more about it. beni, sorry for being a dick. i shouldn't have attacked you personally. it was cocky and unnecessary, and i should have stuck to the facts.
i do want to clarify one thing: our incentives pay for liquidity, not wash trading. the claim that we’re incentivizing wash trading is incorrect, but i should have explained why instead of making it personal.
this has made clear we need to do a better job explaining how our incentives work and the safeguards we have in place. we’ve laid out the full context here: news.kalshi.com/p/the-facts-…
1
4
383
"It's a skill issue"
"Then ERC-20 was a mistake"
People reacting without reading is mind-boggling.
The permissionless tradeoff is not new.
Bad hooks are out there.
Acknowledge that, then let's figure out how to support good builders and users.
Time to build again.
A malicious hook doesn't need a UI to scam you.
👉 It just needs to look like the best quote.
After analyzing over 84,000 v4 hooks, we determined only 19% of hooks to be safe.
It's time to get real about hooks.
6
5
36
2,140
What if a dice roll set your trading fee between 0% and 18%?
That was happening with some Uniswap v4 hooks.
@0xProject analyzed 84,163 hooks.
Only 19.4% were considered safe.
A malicious hook doesn't need a UI to scam you.
👉 It just needs to look like the best quote.
After analyzing over 84,000 v4 hooks, we determined only 19% of hooks to be safe.
It's time to get real about hooks.
1
2
44
11,618
Not all aggregators are created equal.
The quote you see is not always what you get.
Most routers do not flag malicious v4 hooks.
@matchametaxyz does.
1
1
10
1,088
AI won’t solve crypto data.
At least not yet.
AI tools can help, but they cannot replace judgment.
You still have to know what you’re looking at.
who's writing these horrible dune queries lol
most fomo trades route through intermediate hops and this query books every hop as a loss, pnl's will be obliterated
5
3
32
1,676
