Curious about science and human nature. Advocate for radical freedom and personal accountability.

Austin, TX
Texas Wild Cards began as a fort, a Texas-sized house-of-cards, inspired by native Texas wildlife. Take home your own Texas Wild Card playing cards at climbonart.com Delight in the adventure.
9
3
61
27,079
This is an important detail about the Tract 110 concerns in Circle C. CM Ellis's office misled the HOA. Hard not to believe that was deliberate misinformation.
Replying to @PoliticoBurner
I don’t think the HOA supports the zoning change. They were basically lied to about the Developer plans - including being told that the South Bay road would not be extended, so they initially supported changes but then when it came out about the roadway changes including to South Bay and Dahlgreen Rd, the HOA changed it’s position to oppose the changes. Can you look into that angle @chaya_tong ? Ellis knows these changes are no longer supported so to give that quote for your story was typical @PaigeForAustin disingenuity.
2
38
1,036
Jen Robichaux retweeted
Replying to @data_atx
Someone please tell me when some on the council ever had credibility? The lack of performance for services is nothing new, yet all of sudden a concern. Could there be an election around the corner? Wasn't Ryan one for the nine "swooping down" on the freshly found $4.7 million released from TCAD after the property tax protest were resolved? YES.
2
4
15
281
This is the legacy that Council Member Paige Ellis will leave for Southwest Austin. A district coordinating with developers and misleading residents.
Austin City Council Votes Today: Paige Ellis is termed out and still rushing a vote to put 1,000 Stratus apartments across from Kiker Elementary. They never answered the only question that matters: why does the entrance dump traffic straight into an elementary school. Not “we studied it.” Not “here’s the other driveway.” Just push it through before she’s gone, blame the HOA, and let the kids eat the pickup-line chaos. Parents found her official position 3 days before the vote. That’s not planning. That’s a last-day rush order -- why? @chaya_tong reports statesman.com/news/local/art…
7
14
73
2,558
Jen Robichaux retweeted
Austin city staff recommended maintaining or modifying all 133 nonprofit contracts reviewed for possible funding reductions next year, raising questions from City Council members and the mayor about accountability. For @statesman: statesman.com/news/article/a…
2
4
21
4,792
Jen Robichaux retweeted
Two people killed in Austin overnight…one in East Austin, one in South Austin…less than an hour apart. Real neighbors. Real families. Mayor Watson and Congressman Greg Casar were fast to the cameras when it fit their politics. Where’s the press conference now? 🦗🦗🦗 Wilco is watching. Public safety shouldn’t be a photo op. I’m Theodore Schramm, running for Texas House District 136. I’ll keep pressing for leadership that shows up when our communities are hurting….not only when the cameras are friendly. #tx136 #cityofaustintx #traviscountytx #williamsoncountyTX
46
375
1,623
17,660
Jen Robichaux retweeted
Replying to @PoliticoBurner
Look carefully at Prop G. This impacts petitions generated by the public. This is a NO for me. Having to wait for two years (Even Year ballot) is not acceptable for items to be voted on that were generated by a petition.
3
16
238
Jen Robichaux retweeted
Let's break this down - you can't treat this ballot like a single yes/no: - The parks bond is the bait. - Props C, E, G, and H are the power grab. - Prop I is the only item that actually audits City Hall. Vote accordingly.
🚨🚨🚨 IMPORTANT DETAILS FOR AUSTIN VOTERS 🚨🚨🚨 VOTER GUIDE ON AUSTIN CITY BALLOT ITEMS 👇🏻 Prop A - $260,000,000 in bonds for city parks Prop B - $35,000,000 in bonds for two libraries (one of which has recently been rennovated) Prop C - Changes the rules of the Independent Citizens Redistricting Commission. Most concerning is it removes the prohibition of communication with anyone outside of a public hearing and allows council and city staff to interact with the “independent” redistricting commission. Prop D - Administrative update to how city council schedules meetings. City code currently states that council must meet weekly. Since they *actually* meet every other week, someone has to go through and 'cancel' the off week meetings. This amendment is benign. Prop E - This eliminates the requirement that the Council set its meeting rules by ordinance, thereby eliminating the necessity of public input on the proposed meeting changes. The public airing and the ordinance requirement provides the opportunity for changes to be successfully challenged in court. This charter amendment would undermine those protections. Prop F - Amends the charter so that campaign contribution and expenditure limits are based on a calendar year starting January 1st rather than the budget calendar. Prop G - Limits elections for initiatives or charter changes that result from citizen petitions to the next November of an even year. This can result in a unduly long wait for a vote after a citizen petition is validated because of the additional state law requiring two years between charter amendment votes. The city would like this change because it ensures amendments appear in high participation elections, where voters might not be highly informed, rather than in lower turn out elections when only informed voters participate. Prop H - Give the City Council power to appoint and fire the City Attorney. Right now the power lies with the City Manager. It would make the City Attorney a servant of the council and erode their neutrality. (VOTE YES 👇🏻) Prop I - Prop i - Prop eye - Prop aye - This is the citizen led ballot initiative to codify an independent affordability and efficiency audit into the city charter. It would fundamentally change the culture of city government. Would secure audits into the city budget. Prop J - An administrative cleanup of the city code, correcting typos, punctuation, removing moot language. Benign.
1
4
36
1,004
Jen Robichaux retweeted
I am determined to stand up for taxpayers and to make government more transparent and accountable. Austin taxpayers have paid $1 billion in the Project Connect property tax approved in 2020, but no court has yet ruled whether the tax is legal or when ATP can use it to issue bonds. Considering the "Bait-and-Switch" that has occurred with the little light rail plan being worked on, voters should be furious they are still paying that tax.
5
10
51
2,326
Jen Robichaux retweeted
This Thursday, September 24th 6 - 8 PM EverGreen Austin Forum Forum Schedule: South Austin Senior Activity Center 3911 Menchaca Rd. Hosted in the Multi-Purpose Room (signage to point in proper direction) Opening - 6:00 PM District 8 Introductions & EGA Questions - 6:10 PM - 6:30 PM District 8 Audience Questions - 6:30 PM - 6:35 PM District 5 Introductions & EGA Questions - 6:40 PM - 7:00 PM District 5 Audience Questions - 7:00 PM -  7:05 PM District 9 Introductions & EGA Questions - 7:10 PM - 7:30 PM District 9 Audience Questions - 7:30 PM - 7:35 PM Conclusion 8:00 PM Hope to see you there.
2
22
592
Jen Robichaux retweeted
Replying to @smallgovlizard
Q2. I would not vote for a budget that reduces the # of funded APD sworn positions because data shows APD is understaffed (e.g., officers working overtime; speed enforcement down 90%; 911 response times; investigation demand).
1
3
87
Jen Robichaux retweeted
Replying to @smallgovlizard
Q1. A thorough audit must occur & measures taken to reduce tax burden before considering any City property tax increase. This is why I support Prop I.
5
4
11
217
Jen Robichaux retweeted
Austin's homeless housing scoring system was designed so that white people would score lower. Most homeless people in Austin who want housing go through a single waitlist run by ECHO, a nonprofit the city funds to manage the local homeless system. Each person answers an assessment, gets a score, and higher scores get housed first. A few years ago, ECHO concluded the old assessment was "artificially prioritizing white and cisgender people" and said the system needed to undo "white male supremacist culture." So it built a new one. The new assessment doesn't ask about race explicitly. Instead, ECHO tested possible questions and kept the ones that black and non-white clients answered "yes" to at statistically higher rates. Questions that didn't produce that gap were dropped. ECHO's own explanation states the result plainly: "Black and Brown people will consistently score higher than white people and thus be connected more consistently to resources." Austin spends about $51.5 million a year on homelessness, including roughly $12 million on rapid rehousing, and this score means that who gets off the street first depends at least in part on their race.
35
88
377
17,093
Jen Robichaux retweeted
Dear Texas House Member,Texas families are being deliberately robbed — and the thieves are using our own local governments to do it.Hard-working Texans — homeowners, renters, seniors on fixed incomes, and young families just trying to get by — are watching their property taxes skyrocket, their rents climb out of reach, and the cost of living explode. Why? Because Austin and other Texas cities have turned our public libraries into a backdoor ID system explicitly designed to give undocumented immigrants easier access to taxpayer-funded services they would otherwise be unable to use safely.This isn’t some innocent “library upgrade.” Austin officials attended the May 18, 2015 Municipal ID Conference in New York City where the official 2015 Municipal ID Program Toolkit (produced by Cities for Action and the NYC Mayor’s Office of Immigrant Affairs) was handed out. That playbook openly declares the mission: help “particularly vulnerable residents such as undocumented immigrants” access city services, banks, health care, law enforcement, and libraries — while engineering the system to hide them from federal immigration authorities.The evidence is damning:No immigration status check whatsoever. Applicants simply show Matricula/consular IDs, foreign passports, or ITIN letters. No DHS lookup. Deliberate data shielding. The toolkit and Austin’s own 2022 planning documents demand minimal data retention, no copies of underlying documents, routing through nonprofits to dodge the Texas Public Information Act, and “maximizing anonymity.” They branded it an “Enhanced Library Card” specifically to exploit Texas library privacy laws and evade scrutiny. Services handed over on a silver platter. The card is now accepted as official photo ID by Austin Police, Austin Energy, Public Health, Municipal Court, Parks & Recreation, Animal Services, Central Health, and multiple nonprofits. Legal residents and citizens with driver’s licenses get almost nothing new — but undocumented immigrants who lack state ID suddenly gain full, fear-free access to our taxpayer-funded resources. Chicago’s 2025 ICE subpoena forced them to pause online municipal ID applications to protect the very data these programs were built to hide. Texas cities learned the same lesson. The human cost to Texans is heartbreaking. Austin’s city property tax levy has surged 121% since 2015 (from ~$474 million to $1.05 billion). Across Texas, the story is the same. The 2006 Comptroller study — still the most comprehensive official analysis — found undocumented immigrants impose net costs on local governments (hundreds of millions even after taxes paid), especially in education, health, and law enforcement — all paid for by your property taxes. AG Paxton estimated $855 million+ in annual state/local costs for hospitals, incarceration, and emergency Medicaid alone. Add in the post-2020 border surge of 11 million+ undocumented immigrants nationwide (1.6–2+ million in Texas) and the result is predictable: crowded schools, strained hospitals, overwhelmed services, skyrocketing rents, and families priced out of the Texas Dream they built.Cities hide behind “plausible deniability” because no study has ever broken out Enhanced Library Card usage or costs by immigration status — even though the entire program was engineered for this population.Enough. This is not compassion. This is a calculated policy that forces law-abiding Texas taxpayers to subsidize illegal immigration while deliberately shielding the recipients from accountability.
4
9
437
Jen Robichaux retweeted
VOTE AYE ON PROP I NO ON THE REST.
1
3
10
199
Contact Austin City Council and tell them you want to cancel the recurring contracts for items 51, 52, 58, and 59. Tinyurl.com/emailaustincityc… $315,592 to Catholic Charities + Item 51 for legal and counseling work to stabilize immigration status, family reunification, work authorization, public benefits, and counseling + Item 59 so the agency can pay immigration application filing fees for low-income immigrants $539,280 to American Gateways + Item 52 for coaching people who represent themselves in court + Item 57 for screenings, consultations, workshops, pro se help, and legal representation for immigrants
While everyone is focused on the ICE shooting in Austin, the City Council is quietly spending an insane amount of taxpayer money on lawyers to fight deportations. It's tucked into Thursday's consent agenda so it can pass without a word of debate or controversy. The money goes to two nonprofits, American Gateways and Catholic Charities, to provide what the City's own documents call "deportation defense." It pays for: 1. Lawyers representing "detained and non-detained immigrants," including people ICE is actively trying to remove. 2. Coaching immigrants representing themselves in immigration court, helping them file motions and meet deadlines to stay in the country. 3. Legal work that helps immigrants obtain work permits. 4. Federal immigration filing fees. Total bill to be approved: $854,872 City staff list one of the program's goals as helping clients "obtain and maintain public benefits." Austin has already paid American Gateways $3.4 million since 2019, and after Thursday the four contracts will be authorized for up to $6.7 million.
9
67
245
15,079
Jen Robichaux retweeted
Take back Austin. Demand an affordability and efficiency audit. Vote Aye on Prop I
14
69
274
5,556
Jen Robichaux retweeted
I support Prop I, the charter amendment to require an audit of the City of Austin every 5 years & before a tax rate increase. We need to require accountability, efficiency, & transparency. As a former city employee, I saw & reported the inefficiencies & financial mismanagement.
10
18
132
4,337
Jen Robichaux retweeted
The city’s own homeless success metric for District 8 shouldn’t be “more programs.” It should be: can you hike Violet Crown without walking through a dangerous camp, a fire pit, and a trash pile. That’s the bar Bowen set.
Strong Answer from D8 candidate @Bowen4Austin on what 1 thing residents will see if he is successful at the end of his 4 years Answer: Homeless out of the greenbelts
2
32
162
3,129
Jen Robichaux retweeted
Fatigued?
Austin City Council is voting on contract extensions with American Gateways - $548,280 more - totaling $4M to stabilize the immigration status of immigrants by providing screenings, consultations, pro se assistance and legal representation from the Public Health budget. Items 52 & 57 on the Sept 24th agenda austintexas.legistar.com/Mee… The active contracts can be viewed on Austin Finance Online - Vendor V00000952589 financeonline.austintexas.go…
2
6
181
Jen Robichaux retweeted
Williamson County Precinct 1 is taking applications for constable. That’s the same precinct where Andrew Wimsatt sat on a park bench after visiting his mom — and got stabbed to death from behind in broad daylight. Constable is an actual peace officer job. Arrest power. Warrants. Patrol. The last one resigned. Commissioners will appoint the next one. Don’t appoint a mascot, virtue signaler, or activist. Appoint someone who treats “released after competency issues” as a public-safety failure, not a paperwork footnote. If you'll keep people alive in parks at 11 a.m., please apply. communityimpact.com/georgeto…
3
20
85
1,697