BREAKING: Trump administration going "all out" to ease Senate Republicans' concerns on Clarity Act — Semafor Goal is to "push back" on banking groups, showing crypto did not cause deposit flight.

I’m finally ready. After six months of hard work and coding, all my companies will have fully transitioned to kaspa:native for their day-to-day transactions by December. The decision has been made, and the work is almost complete. Starting no later than January 1, 2027, €20 million in financial flows will be routed through kaspa:native . A big thank you to $ESSECBusinessSchool $ESSEC and $GS $GoldmanSachs for their support. kaspa:native $KASPA $KASPAARMY $KASPARMY $KASPIAN $CRYPTO

THE BLOCK: President Trump says the administration is working to bring Hyperliquid into the U.S. in a "fully compliant and legal fashion." The answer will likely involve navigating a regulatory framework that wasn’t built for the kind of around-the-clock crypto trading Hyperliquid has helped popularize.

🚨BREAKING: Trump says America is living under a "False Reality" where great economic numbers CRASH the stock market. "How crazy is this?" "We just got GREAT numbers on jobs, the market should go UP, because our credit and economy are better." "We're living under False Reality that if things are good, you've got to KILL IT because of a fear of inflation." "GROWTH DOES NOT CAUSE INFLATION." Trump says the US should be "doing GDP of 15 and 20%, not 2, 3, and 4%" and that every point in the interest rate costs the US $650 BILLION a year. "The market should be going UP like a Rocketship."

Moderna : @MODERNA $MRNA : 146% dans la journée ... WTF

🗣️ : “J’achète cette action aujourd’hui, ce n’est pas grave si elle est un peu chère, c’est une belle boîte et elle sera forcément plus haute dans 5 ans qu’aujourd’hui.” C’est un raisonnement que je vois couramment passer, mais qui peut coûter cher. Admettons que vous achetiez une société qui fasse croître son bénéfice par action de 10% par an et qui s’échange à 50 fois ces mêmes bénéfices. Beaucoup trop cher donc. (On est plutôt à 20-22 fois les bénéfices pour une entreprise qui progresse à un rythme de 10%/an, parfois un peu plus lorsque l’avantage concurrentiel est énorme et que l’entreprise est très prévisible.) Au cours des 5 années suivantes, les bénéfices par action ont effectivement continué de progresser de 10% par an, mais le marché décide cette fois de valoriser l’entreprise à 25 fois lesdits bénéfices, ce qui est déjà plus cohérent pour une croissance à 10%/an. C’est ce qu’on appelle une contraction des multiples de valorisation. Résultat ? Votre action a perdu 20% sur la période, alors même que ses bénéfices ont pourtant progressé de 61% au global, avec 5 années consécutives à 10% de croissance par an. La contraction des multiples vous a généré une performance négative, malgré la très belle progression des bénéfices de l’entreprise. Vous pouvez acheter la meilleure entreprise du monde, Si vous la payez trop cher, vos performances ne seront pas toujours au rendez-vous. Qualité de la société ➡️ perspectives de croissance ➡️ valorisation Si vous négligez un seul de ces trois éléments, vous avez toutes les chances de ne pas obtenir la performance à laquelle vous vous attendiez.

bitcoin:native agressive DCA mode : « on » I’ll by 0.25 bitcoin:native every week. See you in october guys. (i don’t buy kaspa:native … i mine it !)

Apparently, liquidity is “gone”. Just a little reminder of the past year for the FUD enjoyers. bitcoin:native #bitcoin #CryptoMarket

U.S. indices are going to rise until the Midterms. NQ: 29,000 S&P 500: 7,700 See you in September. Just a simple thought that could quickly fade away. Follow your convictions and never listen to the noise. Politicians come and go; companies produce and will continue to produce, that is an indisputable fact. Follow your convictions, not the noise. @Banana3Stocks @Divs_King @cryptorover $ES $NQ DYOR

The only app you need. linktr.ee/karmapay

THIS IS INSANE This anthropic engineer turned $200 into $14,300 in Polymarket trading bot running Claude Code that analyzes 86M trades and ranks wallets by win rate and profit. The system uses AI to scan 14,000 wallets in minutes and filter trades. It only makes 10 trades daily, focusing on high-probability whale-driven moves and exits early before the whales do.

$WTF $CRYPTO X60 $LOL There’s no world where this shit is worth more than $TAO, $AAVE, $ONDO, or $KASPA $KAS or $SIREN (joke for the last one) … I’m going to short this shit until I don’t have a penny left.

I wrote a PoC token contract in Silverscript, currently called DOG20 (better name ideas are welcome). It supports token ownership by 3 kinds of entities: 1. Public keys — like any regular Kaspa address. 2. P2SH addresses — which means ownership by a stateless contract, e.g. multisig. 3. Covenant IDs — which means ownership by a stateful contract. The third option is the interesting one, and it's a demonstration of a broader concept (that might be familiar to whoever watched the webinar by @IzioDev and @michaelsuttonil), called inter-covenant-communication (ICC). In this context, it means you can put arbitrary stateful rules around token control. For example: - “after the first 10 spends, wait a year before spending again” - zk-rollups can manage their L1 tokens using a stateful bridge. DOG20 also supports minters that are allowed to mint indefinitely — but that does not mean the supply must be unbounded. Let's say you want to publish a token and allow to issue only 100 new tokens each month. DOG20 doesn't support it natively, but you can achieve that by making the only minting entity a covenant. That covenant will store in its state `nextIssuance`, and will allow spends of 100 tokens only if `time > nextIssuance`, and will set `nextIssuance = nextIssuance + 30 days` each time it's used. I hope to explain about it a bit more in the future, but in the meantime, feel free to look at the examples linked in the next comment.

$TAO $Bittensor $GRAYSCALE $CRYPTO $IA $COVENANT What is a decentralized project ? Decentralization aims to allow each participant to hold a share of a project in a relatively balanced way, without excessive concentration of power or influence. When a participant who has become too central leaves a so-called decentralized project and this triggers a significant price reaction, it does not necessarily mean that the project was not decentralized. Rather, it shows that this participant had taken on too much influence within the ecosystem. Their departure creates space: governance is redistributed, shares become more diluted among the remaining participants, and new actors can enter the system. Such events can create panic, with some perceiving them as negative signals. However, they often represent a natural rebalancing of the project toward a healthier state. In that sense, the departure of an overly central actor can be seen as proof that decentralization mechanisms work, allowing the system to organically return to a more balanced distribution. Goodby $COVENANT. Hope you will found your way.

I'm gonna do 100 block/s with proof-of-work, who's coming?

Kaspa army really showed up here. Followed @hashdag ✅

$KAS @MARA is using @Coinbase Prime for custody&settlement of it's $KAS?? #KASPA