We envision a nation where every American may speak, work, learn and live freely. donate: secure.anedot.com/liberty-ju…
Washington, DC
- Tweets 6,147
- Following 6,741
- Followers 24,767
- Likes 8,692
Pinned Tweet
Federal courts at every level have now recognized that these unilateral tariffs, imposed without Congressional authorization, are unlawful and cannot stand.
Our statement on the Supreme Court's decision in V.O.S. Selections, Inc. v. Trump
@sarawynne @neal_katyal @JeffreyMSchwab
19
21
101
511,858
Liberty Justice Center retweeted
Yes please!
Parents—NOT the government—should be able to choose the educational resources that best serve their children.
California cannot offer families educational choice with one hand while denying it with the other when they choose faith-based materials.
LJC's PARENTS Initiative has filed a brief in Woolard v. Thurmond urging SCOTUS to make clear that religious families are entitled to equal access to public-benefit programs. libertyjusticecenter.org/pre…
1
2
13
611
Parents—NOT the government—should be able to choose the educational resources that best serve their children.
California cannot offer families educational choice with one hand while denying it with the other when they choose faith-based materials.
LJC's PARENTS Initiative has filed a brief in Woolard v. Thurmond urging SCOTUS to make clear that religious families are entitled to equal access to public-benefit programs. libertyjusticecenter.org/pre…
1
2
6
1,033
LJC has supported the parents’ challenge from the beginning, filing support briefs before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in support of the parents’ initial appeal and then urging the full Ninth Circuit to rehear the case.
We now ask SCOTUS to ensure that the case reaches the proper constitutional outcome: equal access to educational-choice programs for families of all faiths. libertyjusticecenter.org/ami…
140
The Founders understood the danger of leaving government power unchecked.
Today, ALPRs enable the government to track our whereabouts and collect that information in unregulated storage—all without a warrant.
The Fourth Amendment still means something—and LJC is fighting for the right to be free from warrantless searches and seizures in Scholl v. Illinois State Police, now before the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals. libertyjusticecenter.substac…
3
490
LAWSUIT FILED on behalf of @BKLYNlibrary employee Jeffrey Schwartz.
Our client resigned from his union in 2025. Although he notified Local 1482 that he no longer wished to support it financially, dues continued to be deducted from his wages. libertyjusticecenter.org/pre…
1
437
.@BKLYNlibrary may call itself a private nonprofit. But it was created by the New York Legislature, is overwhelmingly publicly funded, operates in city-owned facilities, is subject to government oversight AND has a Board where 26/38 members are government appointees and public officials.
1
123
New York City cannot avoid its constitutional obligations simply by placing the library under a nominally private corporate label while retaining substantial control over its governance, funding and employment terms.
We look forward to ending this scheme. libertyjusticecenter.org/cas…
95
Dr. Matthew Abraham asked the University of Arizona for records. The University pushed back and illegally withheld those documents.
Now, the Arizona Supreme Court has ruled that was a wrongful denial of public records.
Holding @uarizona accountable won’t end there.
LJC is representing @RenegadeAcademe in a separate lawsuit after U of A retaliated against him for seeking those public records and opposing DEI hiring practices.
thecollegefix.com/state-supr…
3
6
576
These tariffs did not begin when USTR uncovered new evidence about forced labor. They began when the administration’s prior tariff authority expired.
reason.com/2026/09/16/former…
470
Liberty Justice Center retweeted
Commical @GovPritzker !
You took away my PRESS PASS when you didn’t like my line of questioning during the COVID era. Thanks to @LJCenter we got it back.
You’re a hypocrite.
@FoxNews @AM560TheAnswer @DanProft @JeanneIves
This is yet another attack on the First Amendment from a president who knows he and his party of bootlickers are deeply unpopular.
Donald Trump can't hide from his failing record, so he's banning journalists he doesn't like to keep you from hearing about it.
71
1,227
4,474
57,567
Reply brief filed in our Section 301 tariffs lawsuit.
The government has yet to answer three simple questions:
Where are the country-specific findings?
How will these tariffs eliminate the alleged practices?
Why did the NEW worldwide tariff begin the moment Section 122 expired?
This was never a tailored forced-labor policy—it was a plan to keep the global tariff wall in place.
libertyjusticecenter.org/wp-…
1
2
459
We believe every American has the right to speak freely, work freely, learn freely and live without unlawful government interference.
And those constitutional rights mean little unless someone is willing to defend them.
That’s why LJC exists: to stand with the people willing to fight back, to win cases that restore liberty, and to set precedents that protect millions more. #constitutionday
1
1
7
916
Crossing state lines does not negate the federally protected right to bear arms.
Yet Minnesota refuses to honor other states’ lawfully issued firearm permits—placing an unreasonable burden on Second Amendment rights, especially for truckers who must cross state lines for work.
Constitutional rights, #2A included, DO NOT require someone to prove their worthiness to exercise their civil liberties over and over again. dailycaller.com/2026/09/15/p… @2AFDN @NRA
2
2
379
Johnson v. Jacobson concerns a long haul trucker who has carry permits issued by Florida and Georgia. Minnesota honors some carry permits, but not others, and not the two permits Mr. Johnson has. As someone whose work inherently involves constant travel, he shouldn't have to run a gauntlet of permit applications, police interviews, and training courses in each state he wants to carry in.
We have filed an amicus brief urging the Supreme Court to grant cert on his petition, or at minimum, to remand the case to the Eighth Circuit and order it to properly consider the traveler's exception history, which it has not done up to this point.
The brief will be pretty familiar to those of you who remember our brief in the Gardner petition.
We are joined in the brief by NRA, CRPA, MN Gun Owners Caucus, the 2ALC, and CCRKBA.
A thread with some highlights.
SAF urges Supreme Court to require states honor out-of-state carry permits. Said @MorosKostas, "The right to carry does not stop at state lines." tinyurl.com/2smbd948 @2AFDN
3
50
210
17,206
.@CTUlocal1’s idea of victory: posting years of overdue audits only after being sued—then refusing to commit to doing it next year. That’s not transparency.
Since CTU loves our memes, here’s one to make sure they know: we’re appealing.
1
9
17
2,111
Parents should not have to clear judicially created hurdles to challenge a law that directly infringes upon their fundamental right to raise their own children.
The moment the government invades the constitutionally protected relationship between parent and child, the courthouse doors must open.
LJC's PARENTS Initiative, along with @DFIPolicy, has filed a brief in International Partners for Ethical Care v. Ferguson, urging SCOTUS to hold that parents have standing to challenge government policies that displace their authority over their minor children. libertyjusticecenter.org/pre…
1
2
346
CTU wants a victory lap for wasting members money and 2 years hiding their audits? Here’s what happened: Our lawsuit forced CTU to post complete audits on the member portal after years of withholding them.
Today’s ruling lets CTU return to publishing only summaries or nothing at all. We’re appealing. Transparency shouldn’t disappear when scrutiny does.
2
13
58
4,648
CTU also produced two audit reports containing two different auditor opinions.
The audits appeared on CTU’s portal, disappeared, and then reappeared.
Those are not political talking points. They are unanswered questions—and CTU members deserve answers.
1
1
11
510